Preemptive Analgesia for Hemorrhoidectomy

April 23, 2020 updated by: Russian Society of Colorectal Surgeons
Preemptive analgesia with the spinal anesthesia allows to decrease pain in hemorrhoidectomy postoperative period. The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of the use of preemptive analgesia with spinal anesthesia to decrease postoperative pain and the amount of used analgesics including opioids.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Hemorrhoidectomy, as has being demonstrated to be an effective method of treatment for stage III-IV hemorrhoidal disease. However it is associated with intense postoperative pain that requires the use of multimodal analgesia. Inadequate pain control leads to the prolongation of admission, increasing the consumption of opioid analgesics, patients dissatisfaction with treatment.

According to international guidelines of pain management the target level of postoperative pain should be 3-4 or less Visual Analogue Score (VAS) points. The multimodal analgesia including Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen and local anaesthetics are used to reach this aim.

However, there are data on effectiveness of preemptive analgesia in anorectal surgery. Preemptive analgesia allows decreasing pain in postoperative period after hemorrhoidectomy.

Ketoprophenum is used as an preemptive analgetic agent 1 hour prior to procedure.

The aim of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study is to assess the effectiveness of the use of preemptive analgesia with Ketoprophenum 10 mg 2 hours before procedure per os with spinal anaesthesia to decrease postoperative pain and the amount of used analgesics.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
144

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Written informed consent.
  2. Patients over 18 years.
  3. Symptomatic grade III-IV haemorrhoids.
  4. Planned surgery: Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient's refusal to participate in the study.
  2. Pregnancy.
  3. Contraindication or technical inability to perform subarachnoid anaesthesia.
  4. Decompensated somatic diseases

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Ketoprophenum
A tablet with 10 mg Ketoprophenum is taken per os 2 hours before surgery
Procedure: Hemorrhoidectomy
The patient receives spinal anaesthesia and is placed in lithotomy position. A complex of external and internal haemorrhoid or internal haemorrhoid only is excised with monopolar electrocautery or bipolar electrosurgery device. Haemorrhoid pedicle is tied with absorbable polyfilament suture. One, two or three nodes can be removed per a procedure.
Drug: Ketoprophenum
Ketoprophenum
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
A tablet containing starch is taken per os 2 hours before surgery
Drug: Placebo
Placebo
Procedure: Hemorrhoidectomy
The patient receives spinal anaesthesia and is placed in lithotomy position. A complex of external and internal haemorrhoid or internal haemorrhoid only is excised with monopolar electrocautery or bipolar electrosurgery device. Haemorrhoid pedicle is tied with absorbable polyfilament suture. One, two or three nodes can be removed per a procedure.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The frequency of opioid analgesics usage
Time Frame: 0-7 days postoperatively
The frequency of opioid administration per day
0-7 days postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Severity of pain
Time Frame: 6, 12 and 24 hours after the operation, then 2 times per day up to 7th postoperative day
The severity of the pain syndrome before defecation and after defecation reported by the patient according to Visual Analogue Score (VAS), where 0 - the minimum pain, 10 - the worst pain.
6, 12 and 24 hours after the operation, then 2 times per day up to 7th postoperative day
Duration of other analgesics usage
Time Frame: 0-7 days postoperatively
The duration in days of systemic and topical analgesics usage
0-7 days postoperatively
Frequency of other analgesics usage
Time Frame: 0-7 days postoperatively
Times per day of systemic and topical analgesics usage
0-7 days postoperatively
Re-admission rate
Time Frame: 30 days postoperatively
The rate of patients who were re-admitted due to refractory pain
30 days postoperatively
Overall quality of life
Time Frame: 7th and 30th days postoperatively
Assessed with patient-reported questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36). A total score in each of 8 sections will be calculated and transformed into a 0-100 scale with a score of zero equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 equivalent to no disability
7th and 30th days postoperatively
Returning to work
Time Frame: 30 days postoperatively
The period of time in days from the operation to returning to work
30 days postoperatively
The rate of early postoperative complications
Time Frame: 0-30 days postoperatively
The rate of complications: bleeding, retention of urine, infectious complications in early postoperative period
0-30 days postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Russian Society of Colorectal Surgeons

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Petr Tsarkov, Professor, Russian Society of Colorectal Surgeons

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 27, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 25, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 25, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 26, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 23, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 24, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 23, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 10

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings