Which is More Effective in Management of Bruxism: Botox or Occlusal Splints
Which is More Effective in Management of Bruxism for Implant Overdenture Patients: Botox or Occlusal Splints - A One Year Clinical Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Giza, Egypt, 311
- MSA
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients diagnosed with bruxism
- patients had mandibular implant retained overdentures within the previous 3 years
- cooperative patients
- physically and psychologically able patients to tolerate the procedure
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients taking muscle relaxants
- patients without neuromuscular control
- poor oral hygiene
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: control
traditional approach of removing denture at night
|
removal of overdenture at night
|
|
Experimental: intervention 1
occlusal splint
|
occlusal splint on overdenture
|
|
Experimental: intervention 2
Botox
|
Botox injection i masseter in temporalis
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient satisfaction: questionnaire
Time Frame: 12months
|
Patients satisfaction was evaluated using TMD/ NS numeric scales 10 cm questionnaire which included: headache, face pain, face tension, limitation of mouth opening and complaints during mastication with scores from 1 to 10 whereas 1 means least pain and 10 means highest pain.it was assessed at baseline (T0), then after 3months(T3) then after 6months from baseline(T6), then after 9months from baseline(T9) and finally after 12 months from baseline (T12).
which means every 3 months.
|
12months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Electromyography
Time Frame: 12 months
|
measuring muscle activity for massetter and temporalis muscle at baseline,3,6,9,12 months
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Dina Elawady, PHD, Lecturer
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- OctoberUMSA
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.