Evaluation of Three Irrigants, Sodium Hypochlorite, Chlorhexidine and Combination of CHX+H2O2 in Endodontic Treatment.
Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Outcome by Using Three Different Irrigants, Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl), Chlorhexidine (CHX) and Combination of CHX+H2O2 in Primary Endodontic Treatment
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Anshu Yadav
- Phone Number: 9050522830
- Email: anshuyadav99@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Dr Vinay Kumar
- Phone Number: 8901149107
- Email: 29vinaykr@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Haryana
-
Rohtak, Haryana, India
- Recruiting
- PGIDS, Rohtak
-
Contact:
- Anshu Yadav
- Phone Number: 9050522830
- Email: anshuyadav99@gmail.com
-
Contact:
- Dr Vinay Kumar
- Phone Number: 8901149107
- Email: 29vinaykr@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients over 18 years of age.
- Mature permanent mandibular molars.
- A radiographic evidence of periapical radiolucency (minimum size > 2mm×2mm) and a diagnosis of pulpal necrosis, as confirmed by the negative response to cold and electrical tests; and absence of bleeding on entering the pulp chamber.
Exclusion Criteria
- Diabetics, immunocompromised patients, pregnant females, any systemic disease.
- Patients with a history of analgesic intake within the past 3 days and antibiotics in the last month.
- Patients with pockets ≥ 4mm or having marginal or furcal bone loss due to periodontitis.
- Non-restorable tooth, fractured, perforated roots and inflammatory root resorption.
- Teeth those are not suitable for rubber dam isolation.
- Primary teeth.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Sodium hypochlorite
Procedure/Surgery: Thirty mandibular molars treated with root canal treatment by using Sodium hypochlorite during biomechanical preparation.
|
Sodium hypochlorite irrigant will be used during biomechanical preparation.
|
|
Active Comparator: Chlorhexidine
Procedure/Surgery: Thirty mandibular molars treated with root canal treatment by using Chlorhexidine during biomechanical preparation.
|
Chlorhexidine irrigant will be used during biomechanical preparation.
|
|
Experimental: Chlorhexidine + Hydrogen peroxide
Procedure/Surgery: Thirty mandibular molars treated with root canal treatment by using a combination of Chlorhexidine + Hydrogen peroxide during biomechanical preparation.
|
Chlorhexidine + Hydrogen peroxide irrigant will be used during biomechanical preparation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical success
Time Frame: Base line to 1 year.
|
Absence of signs and symptoms Absence of tenderness to percussion Tooth mobility of grade 1 or less Absence of associated soft tissue swelling or tenderness to palpation Attachment loss of less than 5mm . Two experienced observers with no knowledge of the treatment protocol will independently examine the immediate post obturation and follow up radiographs, mounted side by side, under controlled conditions. The treatment is considered successful only when both clinical and radiographic criteria are met. The worst outcome of an individual root decide the overall outcome for the tooth. In the event of disagreement, the two observers will meet to discuss their findings and came to an agreement. |
Base line to 1 year.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Radiographic success
Time Frame: Baseline to 1 year
|
Absence of periapical alterations (radiolucency at furcal or periapical region) Scoring of each tooth will be done according to the following five point scale (PAI) Score Description
|
Baseline to 1 year
|
|
Pain assessment
Time Frame: Baseline to 7 days
|
Assess the incidence and intensity of pain postoperatively at every 6 hours to 1 day till 7d ays using Visual Analogue scale.Pain intensity will be noted as no pain (0-4mm), mild pain (5-44), moderate pain (45-74mm) and severe pain (75-100mm) on the scale of 0-100mm
|
Baseline to 7 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Anshu Yadav, PGIDS, Rohtak
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- anshuyendo
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.