Low Dose Ruxolitinib in Combination With Methylprednisolone

December 12, 2021 updated by: Daihong Liu, Chinese PLA General Hospital

Low Dose Ruxolitinib in Combination With Methylprednisolone 1mg/kg as Initial Therapy for Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease

This study is to determine the efficacy and safety of combined Low dose Ruxolitinib With Methylprednisone as Initial Therapy for the aGVHD(acute graft-versus-host disease )

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Corticosteroid is used as a first-line treatment for acute GVHD. However, it is effective in only about half of patients. In this prospective study, the investigators prospectively combined low dose ruxolitinib and 1mg/kg methylprednisolone in the initial treatment of acute GVHD. In order to effectively control GVHD without exposing acute GVHD patients to more intense and prolonged immunosuppression, we used ruxolitinib (20mg/day, 10mg/day, 5mg/day, 2.5mg/day) combined with 1mg/kg methylprednisolone. To ally steroid-related complications, we decreased steroid exposure time (39 days) and cumulative methylprednisolone doses (15.4 mg/kg) to spare the associated toxicity of glucocorticoid therapy.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
38

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100853
        • Chinese PLA General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 65 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. diagnosed with hematological diseases.
  2. Have undergone first allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) from any donor source using bone marrow, peripheral blood stem cells, or cord blood for hematologic malignancies.
  3. new onset of grade II~IV aGVHD or high risk aGVHD [based on suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (also ST2), Regenerating Islet Derived Protein 3 Alpha (also REG3a), experimental objects) within 100 days post-transplantation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. recipients of second allogeneic stem cell transplant.
  2. acute GVHD induced by donor lymphocyte infusion, interferon.
  3. received first line aGVHD treatment before enrollment.
  4. overlap GVHD syndrome.
  5. pregnant or breast-feeding women.
  6. absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <0.5×10e9/L or platelet count (PLT) < 20×10e9/L
  7. Serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/dL or creatinine clearance < 40 mL/min measured or calculated by Cockroft-Gault equation.
  8. uncontrolled infection
  9. human immunodeficiency virus infection
  10. active hepatitis b virus, hepatitis C virus infection and need antivirus treatment.
  11. Subjects with evidence of relapsed primary disease, or subjects who have been treated for relapse after the allo-HSCT was performed, or graft rejection.
  12. allergic history to Janus kinase inhibitors.

  13. Severe organ dysfunction unrelated to underlying GVHD, including:

    Cholestatic disorders or unresolved veno-occlusive disease of the liver (defined as persistent bilirubin abnormalities not attributable to GVHD and ongoing organ dysfunction). Clinically significant or uncontrolled cardiac disease including unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction within 6 months from Day 1 of study drug administration, New York Heart Association Class III or IV congestive heart failure, circulatory collapse requiring vasopressor or inotropic support, or arrhythmia that requires therapy. Clinically significant respiratory disease that requires mechanical ventilation support or 50% oxygen.

  14. Received Janus kinase inhibitor therapy after allo-HSCT for any indication.
  15. Any condition that would, in the investigator's judgment, interfere with full participation in the study, including administration of study drug and attending required study visits; pose a significant risk to the subject; or interfere with interpretation of study data.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Ruxolitinib10 mg twice a day combined with Corticosteroids
Newly diagnosed acute GVHD patients started therapy with methylprednisolone of 1 mg/kg/day after diagnosis. Ruxolitinib was administered at a median of 2 days after the use of methylprednisolone. Participants began oral administration of ruxolitinib at 10 mg twice a day. Ruxolitinib was subsequently tapered due to the resolution of acute GVHD after three months of therapy. A dose-tapering schedule that would discontinue ruxolitinib in three months was recommended.
Drug: Ruxolitinib 10 mg twice a day combined with Corticosteroids
Newly diagnosed acute GVHD patients started therapy with methylprednisolone of 1 mg/kg/day after diagnosis. Ruxolitinib was administered at a median of 2 days after the use of methylprednisolone. Participants began oral administration of ruxolitinib at 10 mg twice a day. Ruxolitinib was subsequently tapered due to the resolution of acute GVHD after three months of therapy. A dose-tapering schedule that would discontinue ruxolitinib in three months was recommended.
Other Names:
  • ruxolitinib 10 mg twice a day
Experimental: Ruxolitinib5 mg twice a day combined with Corticosteroids
Newly diagnosed acute GVHD patients started therapy with methylprednisolone of 1 mg/kg/day after diagnosis. Ruxolitinib was administered at a median of 2 days after the use of methylprednisolone. Participants began oral administration of ruxolitinib at 5 mg twice a day. Ruxolitinib was subsequently tapered due to the resolution of acute GVHD after three months of therapy. A dose-tapering schedule that would discontinue ruxolitinib in three months was recommended.
Drug: Ruxolitinib 5 mg twice a day combined with Corticosteroids
Newly diagnosed acute GVHD patients started therapy with methylprednisolone of 1 mg/kg/day after diagnosis. Ruxolitinib was administered at a median of 2 days after the use of methylprednisolone. Participants began oral administration of ruxolitinib at 5 mg twice a day. Ruxolitinib was subsequently tapered due to the resolution of acute GVHD after three months of therapy. A dose-tapering schedule that would discontinue ruxolitinib in three months was recommended.
Other Names:
  • ruxolitinib 5 mg twice a day
Experimental: Ruxolitinib5 mg once a day combined with Corticosteroids
Newly diagnosed acute GVHD patients started therapy with methylprednisolone of 1 mg/kg/day after diagnosis. Ruxolitinib was administered at a median of 2 days after the use of methylprednisolone. Participants began oral administration of ruxolitinib at 5mg once a day. Ruxolitinib was subsequently tapered due to the resolution of acute GVHD after three months of therapy. A dose-tapering schedule that would discontinue ruxolitinib in three months was recommended.
Drug: Ruxolitinib 5 mg once a day combined with Corticosteroids
Newly diagnosed acute GVHD patients started therapy with methylprednisolone of 1 mg/kg/day after diagnosis. Ruxolitinib was administered at a median of 2 days after the use of methylprednisolone. Participants began oral administration of ruxolitinib at 5 mg once a day. Ruxolitinib was subsequently tapered due to the resolution of acute GVHD after three months of therapy. A dose-tapering schedule that would discontinue ruxolitinib in three months was recommended.
Other Names:
  • Ruxolitinib 5 mg once a day
Experimental: Ruxolitinib 2.5 mg twice a day combined with Corticosteroids
Newly diagnosed acute GVHD patients started therapy with methylprednisolone of 1 mg/kg/day after diagnosis. Ruxolitinib was administered at a median of 2 days after the use of methylprednisolone. Participants began oral administration of ruxolitinib at 2.5 mg once a day. Ruxolitinib was subsequently tapered due to the resolution of acute GVHD after three months of therapy. A dose-tapering schedule that would discontinue ruxolitinib in three months was recommended.
Drug: Ruxolitinib 2.5 mg once a day combined with Corticosteroids
Newly diagnosed acute GVHD patients started therapy with methylprednisolone of 1 mg/kg/day after diagnosis. Ruxolitinib was administered at a median of 2 days after the use of methylprednisolone. Participants began oral administration of ruxolitinib at 2.5 mg once a day. Ruxolitinib was subsequently tapered due to the resolution of acute GVHD after three months of therapy. A dose-tapering schedule that would discontinue ruxolitinib in three months was recommended.
Other Names:
  • Ruxolitinib 2.5 mg once a day

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
complete remission rate of acute GVHD 28 days after enrollment.
Time Frame: Day 28 after treatment
Defined as the proportion of participants demonstrating a complete response (CR), or partial response (PR) of acute GVHD
Day 28 after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the incidence of relapsed acute GVHD
Time Frame: Day 90 after treatment
Defined as the proportion of participants whose improved acute GVHD.
Day 90 after treatment
Six-month duration of response
Time Frame: Six-month after treatment
Defined as the time from first response until graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) progression or death. Duration of response will be assessed when all participants who are still on study complete the Day 180 visit.
Six-month after treatment
Duration of response
Time Frame: Day 90 after treatment
Defined as the time from first response until GVHD progression or death, when all participants who are still on study complete the Day 90 visit.
Day 90 after treatment
Nonrelapse mortality (NRM)
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment
Defined as the proportion of subjects who died due to causes other than malignancy relapse.
6 months after treatment
Relapse rate
Time Frame: 2 years after treatment
Defined as the proportion of participants whose underlying malignancy relapsed.
2 years after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Chinese PLA General Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Daihong Liu, Chinese PLA General Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 14, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 12, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • S-2019-177-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stem Cell Transplant Complications

Clinical Trials on Ruxolitinib 10 mg twice a day combined with Corticosteroids

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings