A Clinical Study to Evaluate Safety and Performance of PEEK-OPTIMA™ HA Enhanced.

September 7, 2026 updated by: Invibio Ltd

A Prospective, Non-comparative, Single-centre, Post-market Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance of PEEK-OPTIMA™ HA Enhanced Interbody Cages for the Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease in the Lumbar Spine

The purpose of this trial is to collect clinical outcomes including radiographic and CT outcomes in patients who undergo spinal fusion using the Keos Lumbar Interbody Fusion Device.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This prospective, non-comparative, single-center, post-market trial will evaluate the safety and efficacy of the PEEK-OPTIMA ™ HA Enhanced Keos Lumbar Interbody Fusion Device in patients suffering from degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis and retrolisthesis in the lumbar spine. The trial will capture clinical outcomes, radiographic and CT outcomes over a 24 month period post operatively. One centre will be involved in the recruitment of 30 patients the clinic involved will focus on this type of treatment.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
25

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States, 17601
        • Neurosurgical Associates of Lancaster

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged 18 years of age or older.
  2. Primary diagnosis of symptomatic degenerative disc disease (DDD) or symptomatic degenerative disc disease (DDD) with spondylolisthesis (Grade 1), or retrolisthesis, at one or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1.
  3. Have discogenic back pain.
  4. Suitable for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery.
  5. Indicated for surgical treatment with the Keos Lumbar IBFD with autologous bone graft.
  6. Completed at least 6 months of conservative non-operative treatment.
  7. Female subjects of childbearing age must have a negative pregnancy test.
  8. Able to understand this clinical study, co-operate with procedures.
  9. Able to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Not undergone previous spinal surgery at the affected disc level(s).
  2. Evidence of tumour and/or malignant disease.
  3. Known osteoporosis or severe osteopenia.
  4. Known rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis or who are immunocompromised.
  5. Known allergy to the material used in the instrumentation.
  6. Evidence of an active infection.
  7. Any conditions outlined as contraindicated in the Instructions for Use.
  8. Receiving any drug treatment that may affect bone metabolism.
  9. Female subjects who are pregnant or lactating.
  10. Current smokers or have stopped smoking less than 6 months ago.
  11. Known drug or alcohol abusers.
  12. Currently enrolled in a clinical study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Device
All subjects who are entered into this trial will receive the Keos Lumbar Interbody Fusion Device.
Device: Surgery with the Keos Lumbar Interbody Fusion Device
All subjects will received the Keos Lumbar Interbody Fusion Device if according to the investigators opinion they are clinically indicated to have surgery treatment for degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis and retrolisthesis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Interbody fusion rate
Time Frame: 6 months post - operatively
Interbody fusion will be graded along the superior and inferior interfaces separately in 25% increments
6 months post - operatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To measure how much pain the subject is in according to a pain scale 0-10
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post operatively
Visual analogue scale for back and leg 0-10 cm (no pain - worst possible pain)
6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post operatively
To measure the Quality of Life of the subject according to a set list of questions: Questionnaire SF-12
Time Frame: pre-operatively, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post operatively
Questionnaire SF-12 collection of questions health related to assess vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, emotional and physical functioning, social and mental health. Patients will pick from a set list of answers for each health related question. The responses on each item are scored and summarised into Physical and Mental Health Composite Scores (PCS & MCS) and range from 0-100. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e.a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
pre-operatively, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post operatively
Functional Impairment
Time Frame: pre-operatively, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post operatively
Questionnaire ODI (Oswestry Disability Index) - disability questionnaire used to assess functional impairment of the patient. Regarding lifting, ability to walk, sit, stand, sleep, travel and graded by score of 0-100 (0= no disability and 100= maximum disability possible)
pre-operatively, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post operatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Invibio Ltd

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Medical Metrics Diagnostics, Inc
Keos LLC
Technomics Research
Viedoc Technologies

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Louis A Marotti, M.D. PhD, Neurosurgical Associates of Lancaster

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 27, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 27, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 2, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 2, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 4, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 7, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • KEOS01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings