Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease

June 11, 2020 updated by: Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Freezing of gait (FOG) is a common and devastating symptom in advanced stage Parkinson's disease (PD), which contributes to falls and disability. Unfortunately, there is no effective pharmacological treatment for FOG. It is suggested that the cortex-basal ganglia circuit, especially the frontal lobe, plays an important role in the pathogenesis of FOG. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) effects over the cortex and affects the subcortical neural circuits. Previous studies have demonstrated that rTMS can improve FOG for PD patients. In the present randomized controlled trial (RCT) study, the invastigators aim to investigate the efficiency of rTMS over different motor regions of frontal lobe. The efficacy of treatment is evaluated by the score of FOG questionnaire and FOG provoking test, and the changing of neural network shown by functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI). Then the effects of rTMS over different brain regions will be compared for choosing a better target. The study will provide the evidence for non-invasive neuro-modulation of Parkinson's disease with freezing of gait (PD-FOG).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
66

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
      • Beijing, China, 100730
        • Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects fulfilled the diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease according to MDS-PD criteria
  • Hoehn & Yahr (H-Y) stage was 2 or 3
  • All subjects had freezing of gait which was identified by FOGQ

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cognitive impairment (MMSE score<22) or major depression (HAMD-24 score>25)
  • severe visual and/or haring impairment
  • significant medical or psychiatric illnesses
  • history of deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery or pacemaker implantation. MRI cannot be performed in those patients
  • current treatment with medication cannot be maintained during the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
SHAM_COMPARATOR: sham stimulation
Device: sham stimulation
the device of sham stimulation was MagStim MC-P-B70 placebo butterfly coil
EXPERIMENTAL: rTMS over M1 region
The stimulus intensity was set to 100% of the resting motor threshold. Ten sessions of rTMS were delivered over 2 weeks, one session per day for 5 consecutive days per week. Each session consisted of 10 trains of 100 pulses at 10Hz with an inter-train interval of 40 seconds. In this group, the target of rTMS is M1 region.
Device: rTMS
The device is made in London, United Kingdom
EXPERIMENTAL: rTMS over supplementary motor area (SMA)
The stimulus intensity was set to 100% of the resting motor threshold. Ten sessions of rTMS were delivered over 2 weeks, one session per day for 5 consecutive days per week. Each session consisted of 10 trains of 100 pulses at 10Hz with an inter-train interval of 40 seconds. In this group, the target of rTMS is SMA region.
Device: rTMS
The device is made in London, United Kingdom

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the change of freezing of gait questionnaire (FOGQ)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 weeks
a self-assessment scale for evaluating FOG severity，the minimum value is 0, the maximum value is 24, and higher scores mean a worse outcome.
through study completion, an average of 2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the change of freezing of gait score (FOG score)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 weeks
assess the severity of FOG, the minimum value is 0, the maximum value is 36, and higher scores mean a worse outcome.
through study completion, an average of 2 weeks
the change of score of Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part III
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 weeks
assess the motor ability, the minimum value is 0, the maximum value is 132, and higher scores mean a worse outcome.
through study completion, an average of 2 weeks
the change of Hamilton Depression (HAMD) Scale
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 weeks
assess the severity of depression, the minimum value is 0, the maximum value is 76, and higher scores mean a worse outcome.
through study completion, an average of 2 weeks
the change of Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) scale
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 weeks
assess the severity of mental state, the minimum value is 0, the maximum value is 30, and higher scores mean a worse outcome.
through study completion, an average of 2 weeks
the change of Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 weeks
assess the quality of life, the minimum value is 0, the maximum value is 156, and higher scores mean a worse outcome.
through study completion, an average of 2 weeks
functional image of the brain (FMRI)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 10 days
graph theoretical analysis of the brain network
through study completion, an average of 10 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 15, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 14, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 14, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 27, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 11, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 11, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • rTMSPDFOG-PUMCH

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on rTMS

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings