Development and Validation of the Client Centered Occupational Therapy Service Model

March 2, 2021 updated by: Taipei City Hospital
The purpose of the study is to develop and validate Client-centered Occupational Therapy Service at Taipei City Psychiatric Center (OT@tcpc) service model to assist clinicians to provide and integrate comprehensive OT services.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Occupational Therapy (OT) is one of the mental health services. The service phase includes acute/chronic hospitalization, daycare centers (adolescents, adults, and the elderly), community mental rehabilitation institutions, psychiatric nursing home, and outpatient assessment/treatments. OT provides holistic and continuous mental rehabilitation services at each stage of mental health care. During the acute hospitalization and based on the Model of Human Occupation (MOHO) model, the occupational therapist provides daily activities to assist acute patients with mental illness to develop occupation adaptation to enable and prepare for discharge.

However, the lack of a client-centered OT service model limits the interpretation of the treatment effect and the process of change. This will seriously affect the integrity and continuity of OT services and will limit the development of OT professions. Thus, the purpose of the study is to develop and validate Client-centered Occupational Therapy Service at Taipei City Psychiatric Center (OT@tcpc) service model to assist clinicians to provide and integrate comprehensive OT services.

This project consists of 2 stages. First, based on the MOHO model we use 5 stages with 6 weeks program to develop the OT@tcpc service model. Second, validate the to indicate the occupation identity and competence to validate the OT@tcpc service model. We will recruit 70 inpatients with schizophrenia and divided into intervention group, based on MOHO theory, and control group.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
33

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Taiwan
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 110209
        • Taipei City Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients diagnosed with schizophrenia according to DSM-5 diagnostic criteria.
  2. Over 20 years old.
  3. Agree to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Diagnosis of intellectual developmental disorders 2. History of severe brain injury 3. Cannot complete the study due to poor cognitive, vision or hand function

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Intervention Group

We will recruit 70 inpatients with schizophrenia and divided into intervention group and control group. The Intervention group provided Occupational therapy based on the MOHO theory, while the control group adopted the original Occupational therapy model.

The research at this stage is based on the theoretical framework of the MOHO model and the clinical practice of OTPF-3. Clinical experts are requested to assist in providing relevant suggestions as a reference for modifying intervention activities. Design OT@tcpc service model for occupational therapy intervention activities. The event design is based on the 4 systems of determinationl, habits, performance and environment, and 2 events are designed for each to be carried out in a group. Each activity includes 4 parts: warm-up, activity, feedback and homework. Each activity group will be explained separately so that the occupational therapist of the group can complete it under the guidance.
Behavioral: Occupational therapy based on the MOHO theory

We selected two acute wards in the Songde hospital as the intervention group and the control group. At the same time, the demographic data of the participants were collected, including gender, age, age of onset, marital status, education level, work experience, etc., and the clinical records, including assessment of mental symptoms and medication records, etc. Continuity or categorical information on Occupational performance, personal and social performance, instrumental activities daily living, and clinical performance.

OPHI-II, CGIS, PSP, LIADL, COPM, COTES were tested before and after in the intervention group and the control group to explain the intervention effect of the MOHO theory-based treatment model.
Active Comparator: Control Group

We will recruit 70 inpatients with schizophrenia and divided into intervention group and control group. The Intervention group provided Occupational therapy based on the MOHO theory, while the control group adopted the original Occupational therapy model.

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Taipei City Hospital. After informed consent, the patients signed the consent form for this study and became the participant of this study.

Each activity group will be explained separately so that the participants of each group can complete it under the guidance. The group description includes: activity title, activity time (location), MOHO theory system, group purpose, activity content, equipment or materials, precautions, etc.
Behavioral: Occupational therapy
The original Occupational therapy. OPHI-II, CGIS, PSP, LIADL, COPM, COTES were tested before and after in the intervention group and the control group to explain the intervention effect of the MOHO theory-based treatment model.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Occupational Performance History Interview-II (OPHI-II) Total and Subscale Scores
Time Frame: 2 weeks

The Occupational Performance History Interview-Second Version(OPHI-II) was tested before and after in the intervention group and the control group to explain the intervention effect of the MOHO theory-based treatment model.

OPHI-II is a semi-structured interview that gathers life history information. The OPHI-II contains 3 sub-domains: OPHI-II Occupational Identity(range 11~44)、OPHI-II Occupational Competence(range 9~36)、OPHI-II Occupational Behavior Settings(range 9~36).

The three sub-domains are divided into 4 levels, in which 4 points indicate good performance, 3 points indicate good functions, 2 points indicate lack of certain functions, and 1 points indicate poor functions. The total score of OPHI-II is equal to the sum of the three sub-domains (scores 29 to 116; higher scores indicate higher performance).
2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Occupational Therapy Evaluation Scales Measure
Time Frame: 2 weeks

Except for Mini-Menlal State Examination(MMSE), all other tools were tested before and after in the intervention group and the control group to explain the intervention effect of the MOHO theory-based treatment model

The secondary outcome included the following instruments:

  1. Mini-Menlal State Examination, MMSE(range 0~30；the higher scores indicate greater ability)
  2. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, COPM(performance and satisfaction, each range 1~10；the higher scores indicate greater performance)
  3. Personal and Social Performance scale , PSP(range 1~100；the higher scores indicate greater performance)
  4. Clinical Global Impressions Scale of Severity, CGIS(range 1~7；the lower scores indicate greater performance)
  5. Comprehensive Occupational Therapy Evaluation Scale, COTES(range 20~100；the higher scores indicate greater performance)
  6. Lawton Instrumental Activities Daily Living, LIADL(range 0~23；the higher scores indicate greater performance)
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Taipei City Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Shu-Chun Lee, Master, Department of Occupational Therapy

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 19, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 16, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 16, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 7, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 9, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 10, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 24, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 2, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • TCHIRB-10904021

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Occupational Therapy

Clinical Trials on Occupational therapy based on the MOHO theory

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings