Lung Ultrasound for COVID-19 Initial Triage and Monitoring (QUICK)

May 28, 2021 updated by: University Hospital, Toulouse

Use of Lung Ultrasound for COVID-19 Patient's Initial Triage Assessment and Early Monitoring: a Pilot Study

The QUICK study main aim is to assess the predictive value at Day 1, of a model built on lung ultrasound (LUS) and clinical data, both recorded at hospital admission of COVID-19 patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Initial triage assessment is the cornerstone of first-line medical management for COVID-19 patients. Only an accurate and fast evaluation of COVID-19 patients respiratory system integrity, can allow optimal treatment care and medical resources attribution. Despite its very large deployment, the use of thoracic Computed Tomography (CT scan) for COVID-19 patients severity assessment is currently debated. Actually CT-scan use in this setting: i) it is associated with risky in/out hospital patient's transport, both in terms of medical management of patient's critical conditions and risk of COVID-19 nosocomial transmission, ii) risks related to x-ray exposure iii) CT-scan is a snapshot of respiratory system integrity and does not provide data that might be used for patient's monitoring. LUS is a non-invasive, non-ionizing, fully bedside imaging tool. Investigators team has previously contributed to the development and validation of LUS for critically ill patient's management. To the extent of our knowledge, there is neither data regarding COVID-19 patient's LUS patterns, nor about the potential link between LUS data, patient's severity and outcome.

The investigators hypothesize that the combined use of LUS and clinical data (Q-SOFA score, SpiO2/FiO2) recorded at COVID-19 patients hospital admission, will allow to accurately predict short-term outcome. The investigators expect to predict at patient's hospital admission, the patient's clinical status at 24h: favorable (spontaneous ventilation with O2 < 6 l/min) or unfavorable (spontaneous ventilation with O2 > 6 l/min or under mechanical ventilation).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
25

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Toulouse, France
        • University Hospital toulouse

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Pilot study

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Adult (> 18 years).
  • Proven COVID-19 (specific PCR from respiratory track sample)
  • CT scan prescribed by physician in charge, independently of research.
  • Patients consent (or surrogate decision maker's consent in case of need).

Exclusion criteria:

  • Reduction or cessation of active treatment.
  • Patient under guardianship, tutelage measure or judicial protection
  • Patient deprived of liberty by judicial order
  • No French health insurance.
  • Pregnancy or nursing woman.
  • Enrolled in another trial evaluating thoracic imaging.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
COVID-19 patients
Adult (> 18 years) with Proven COVID-19 (specific PCR from respiratory track sample)
Other: thoracic lung ultrasound
Patients will be recruited the day of their hospital admission. All patients will be assessed by thoracic Computed Tomography scan then immediately before/after CT scan, patients will be clinically assessed (Q-SOFA, SpiO2/FiO2) and a lung ultrasound evaluation (mean time of evaluation 7 min +/- 3 min; fully respect of COVID-19 barrier measures) will be performed by an investigator. Patients clinical status and outcomes will be extracted from patient's medical file at day 1 and day 28 from patient's admission by investigators blinded from previously recorded lung ultrasound data.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Area Under the Curve (AUC) of a predictive model built on LUS and clinical (Q-SOFA, SpiO2/FiO2) data
Time Frame: Day 1
Area Under the Curve (AUC) of a predictive model at 24h from hospital admission (Favorable vs Unfavorable), built on LUS (12 thoracic regions) and clinical (Q-SOFA, SpiO2/FiO2) data recorded at hospital admission.
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
mortality
Time Frame: Day 28
mortality
Day 28
Area Under the Curve (AUC) of a predictive model built on CT scan and clinical (Q-SOFA, SpiO2/FiO2) data
Time Frame: Day 1
Area Under the Curve (AUC) of a predictive model at 24h from hospital admission (Favorable vs Unfavorable), built on CT scan and clinical (Q-SOFA, SpiO2/FiO2) data recorded at hospital admission.
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Toulouse

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Benjamine SARTON, ph, University Hospital, Toulouse

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 27, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 7, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 7, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 7, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 15, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 1, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 28, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RC31/20/0182
  • 2020-A01445-34 (Other Identifier: ID-RCB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings