Early Versus Routine Drain Removal After Live Liver Donor Hepatectomy

May 9, 2022 updated by: Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India

"Early Versus Routine Drain Removal After Live Liver Donor Hepatectomy- a Randomized Controlled, Open Label, Pilot Study".

It's a randomized control trial to compare early drain removal versus standard drain removal after donor hepatectomy in terms of donor outcomes. We will analyse the data and elucidate the safety of early drain removal using 3x3 rule with routine drain removal.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

  • Prophylactic abdominal drainage after donor right hepatectomy for LDLT has been a common or even mandatory practice in most transplant centres.
  • This serves to monitor the occurrence of postoperative intraabdominal bleeding and is used for the detection and drainage of any bile leakage.
  • Below table mentions both advantages and disadvantages of prophylactic drain placement after hepatectomy.

Advantages

  1. Early detection of haemorrhage
  2. Early detection of bile leak
  3. Early reintervention Disadvantages

1. Increased rates of intraabdominal and wound infection, 2. Increased abdominal pain, 3. Decreased pulmonary function, 4. Prolonged hospital stay, 5. Bowel injury.

  • Our study in ILBS for ALF donors, the overall complication rate was 20% as per Clavien-Dindo classification, of which a majority (15.9%) had grade 1 or 2 complications. Major complications (3b and above) were seen in 4 (1.0%) patients. Biliary complications were noted in 1.7% only.
  • In a study by Japanese group concluded that 3 × 3 rule is clinically feasible and allows for the early removal of the drain tube with minimum infection risk after liver resection. The ''3 x 3 rule'': the drain will be removed when the drain fluid bilirubin concentration is <3 mg/dl on day 3 after operation.
  • In our institute we remove drain routinely, when output is less than 100ml and serous. That is usually on postoperative day 5-7.
  • There is no randomized control trail done in donor hepatectomy comparing early versus standard drain removal.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
108

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • India
      • Delhi, India, 110070
        • ILBS - Parthiban

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Donors evaluated as per institutional protocol for donor hepatectomy and found fit

    • Those who consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients refusing to consent for inclusion in the study.
  • Left lateral hepatectomy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Early drain removal - POD3
Drain removal on POD3 if drain bilirubin is less than 3mg/dl and serous in nature.
Other: Drain Removal
Abdominal drain placed during surgery removal
Placebo Comparator: Routine Drain Removal
Drain removed routinely when the output is less than 100ml and serous in nature
Other: Drain Removal
Abdominal drain placed during surgery removal

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
safety of drain removal using 3x3 rule - overall complications.
Time Frame: patient will be followed upto 3 months after surgery
Comprehensive complication index (CCI) - clavin dindo classification
patient will be followed upto 3 months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post operative pain relief
Time Frame: patient will be followed upto 3 months after surgery
using Visual analogue score
patient will be followed upto 3 months after surgery
Bile leak
Time Frame: patient will be followed upto 3 months after surgery
standard ISGLS definition - drain bilirubin measured in mg/dl.
patient will be followed upto 3 months after surgery
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: patient will be followed upto 3 months after surgery
calculated from the day of admission to day of discharge, and based on the number of nights spent in hospital
patient will be followed upto 3 months after surgery
Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
Time Frame: patient will be followed upto 3 months after surgery

patient has at least one of the following:

  1. purulent drainage from the superficial incision.
  2. organism(s) identified from an aseptically-obtained specimen from the superficial incision or subcutaneous tissue by a culture or non-culture based microbiologic testing method which is performed for purposes of clinical diagnosis or treatment (for example, not Active Surveillance Culture/Testing (ASC/AST)).
  3. superficial incision that is deliberately opened by a surgeon, physician* or physician designee and culture or non-culture based testing of the superficial incision or subcutaneous tissue is not performed AND patient has at least one of the following signs or symptoms: localized pain or tenderness; localized swelling; erythema; or heat.
  4. diagnosis of a superficial incisional SSI by a physician* or physician designee.
patient will be followed upto 3 months after surgery
reintervention rate
Time Frame: patient will be followed upto 3 months after surgery
defined as any additional abdominal intervention ( surgical or radiological) during the same hospital stay after the primary operation
patient will be followed upto 3 months after surgery
readmission rate
Time Frame: patient will be followed upto 3 months after surgery
90 day readmission rate - any hospital admission after the index admission.
patient will be followed upto 3 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 28, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 25, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 25, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 30, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 5, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 7, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 9, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ILBS/LIVEDONORS/01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Transplant

Clinical Trials on Drain Removal

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings