Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Bronchodilator in Non-CF Bronchiectasis With Airflow Limitation

August 11, 2020 updated by: Jin-Fu Xu, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China

Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Bronchodilator in Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis Patients With Airflow Limitation: a Multicenter, Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial

Airflow limitation is common exist in idiopathic bronchiectasis patients. However, there are few evidence on the treatment of bronchodilator in bronchiectasis with airflow limitation. The efficacy and safety of dual bronchodilator in idiopathic bronchiectasis with airflow limitation are still unclear. Thus, the investigators conduct a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of dual bronchodilator in idiopathic bronchiectasis with airflow limitation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Airflow limitation is common exist in idiopathic bronchiectasis patients. Our previous studies showed that FEV1<50% is one of the major risk factors for poor prognosis and high incidence of acute exacerbation in patients with bronchiectasis. However, there are few evidence on the treatment of bronchodilator in bronchiectasis with airflow limitation, and there is no recommendation in bronchiectasis guidelines. Moreover, because of the high risk of infection and bacterial colonization in bronchiectasis, there is still unclear whether inhaled corticosteroids or bronchodilators affect the parameters of bronchiectasis. Thus, there is urgent need to optimize the treatment of bronchiectasis with airflow limitation.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Idiopathic bronchiectasis with FEV1/FVC < 70%

Exclusion Criteria:

  • With Asthma
  • α-1 antitrypsin deficiency
  • Turculosis
  • Lung cancer
  • Sarcoidosis
  • Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
  • Primary pulmonary hypertension
  • Uncontrolled sleep apnea
  • Bronchiectasis accepted long-term low dose macrolides
  • Pulmonary surgery within 6 months
  • Lower respiratory tract infections require antibiotic treatment in 6 weeks
  • Upper respiratory tract infection did not recover for at least 7 days
  • With Glaucoma or severe prostate hyperplasia that can not use Indacaterol
  • Patients allergic to experimental drugs
  • Women pregnant, breast-feeding or who planned a pregnancy during the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Experimental group
Indacaterol-Glycopyrronium (110ug/50ug QD inhalation) for one year.
Drug: LABA/LAMA or Placebo inhalation
Inhaled LABA/LAMA for one year.
Other Names:
  • Inhaled dual Bronchodilator
Placebo Comparator: Control group
Placebo treatment for the airway limitation.
Drug: LABA/LAMA or Placebo inhalation
Inhaled LABA/LAMA for one year.
Other Names:
  • Inhaled dual Bronchodilator

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Actue exacerbation
Time Frame: One year
Times of acute exacerbation
One year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
modified Medical Research Council score
Time Frame: Six months
modified Medical Research Council score for the degree of dyspnea. The minimum value is 0 and maximum value is 4. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Six months
Leicester Cough Questionnaire
Time Frame: Six months
Cough Questionnaire for the degree of cough. The minimum value is 1 and maximum value is 21. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Six months
Questionnaire of life-Bronchiectasis
Time Frame: Six months
Including eight scales: respiratory symptoms; physical, role, emotional, and social functioning; vitality; health perceptions; and treatment burden. For each scale, scores are standardized on a 0-to-100-point scale; higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Six months
FEV1, FVC
Time Frame: Six months
Forced Expiratory Volume In 1s and Forced Vital Capacity.
Six months
FEV1%
Time Frame: Six months
The percent of predicted Forced Expiratory Volume In 1s
Six months
Incidence of atrial fibrillation
Time Frame: Six months
One of common adverse events
Six months
Incidence of coronary artery disease
Time Frame: Six months
One of common adverse events
Six months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Jin-fu Xu, MD, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 22, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 12, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 12, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 11, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20200413

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings