Simulator Based Powered Mobility Training of Children With Special Needs
Powered Mobility Training of Children With Special Needs: Conventional Versus Simulator-based Practice
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study compared conventional powered mobility practice to simulator based practice of children with special needs aged 6-18 years.
The study has 3 stages: 1) Simulator validity study 2) Powered mobility outcome measures reliability and validity for children 6-18 years 3) Intervention study to compare simulator based practice and powered mobility practice.
- Simulator validity study included 30 children aged 6-18 years, proficient powered mobility drivers. All participants had physical disabilities- CP or Neuromuscular conditions.
- This stage included the first 30 children from the intervention study. Data for the study was based on the first evaluation out of the two evaluations in the study.
- This stage included 36 children aged 6-18 years in need of powered mobility practice to become a proficient driver. The particpants were divided into two groups- experimental (simulator based practice) and control group (standard powered wheelchair practice).
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Jerusalem, Israel
- Alyn Pediatrics Rehabilitation Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children with a physical disability that are not proficient powered mobility driver
- Children that can use a joystick
Exclusion Criteria:
- Children with visual accuracy limitations that cannot be corrected with glasses or contact lens;
- Children who have a severe intellectual and developmental disability as defined by the Israel Ministry of Welfare's index for intellectual and developmental disabilities and reported by parents; Children that have a unstable medical conditions that prevent them from participating in powered mobility training (e.g., epilepsy)
- Children that can operate a powered wheelchair via switches or a scanning device.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Powered Mobility Training Simulator
Powered mobility simulator- the McGill Immersive Wheelchair Simulator (MiWe) was developed for adults.
In a previous study the simulator was found valid for use with children.
Participants were provided a laptop, joystick and the software program- MiWe- to practice at home or school
|
Two groups of participants- 18 in each- were provided with either a simulator or powered wheelchair.
Both groups were tested at baseline for powered mobility level.
Both groups the practiced at home or school for 12 weeks, 4 times a week for at least 20 minutes.
Both groups returned and underwent another evaluation to assess powered mobility level after 12 weeks of practice.
Other Names:
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Training with Powered Wheel Chair
Participants were provided with a powered wheelchair to practice at home or school
|
Training with Powered Wheel Chair
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Powered Mobility Program- Assessing change from Baseline to End of intervention
Time Frame: This outcome measure is done at baseline and after 12 weeks of practice.
|
This is an evaluation that has up to 34 items that assess the driving skills of powered wheelchair users.
Each skill can receive a score of 0-5.
The higher the score the better.
The total sum of all skills is divided by the number of skills tested and an average score ranging from 0-5 is recorded.
|
This outcome measure is done at baseline and after 12 weeks of practice.
|
|
Assessment of Learning Powered Mobility Use- Assessing change from Baseline to End of intervention
Time Frame: This outcome measure is done at baseline and after 12 weeks of practice.
|
This is an evaluation that has 8 levels of 5 skills.
It assess the level of powered mobility driving in areas that the PMP does not- cognitive, emotional, social.
Each of the 5 skills receives a score of 1-8.
The sum of all skills scores is divided by 5.
The score can be between 1-8.
A higher score is better.
|
This outcome measure is done at baseline and after 12 weeks of practice.
|
|
The Israel Ministry of Health Proficiency Test- Assessing change from Baseline to End of intervention
Time Frame: This outcome measure is done at baseline and after 12 weeks of practice.
|
This is an evaluation that assess 7 powered mobility skills.
The driver needs to succeed 4/5 times each skill in order to pass test.
Each of the 7 skills receives a score of 1,3,5.
The sum of all skills is divided by 7 and the average score is recorded 1-5.
The higher the score the better.
|
This outcome measure is done at baseline and after 12 weeks of practice.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Naomi Gefen, M.A., Alyn Pediatric and Adolescent Rehabilitation Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 004-17
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.