Clinical Trial Evaluating Chlorine e6 Derivative-mediated Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy as a Treatment for Denture Stomatitis

August 25, 2020 updated by: São Paulo State University

A Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating Chlorine e6 Derivative-mediated Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy as a Treatment for Denture Stomatitis

Objective: This randomized clinical trial assessed antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy (aPDT) mediated by Photodithazine (PDZ) to treat patients with denture stomatitis (DS). Methodologies: Patients with DS were randomly assigned to the groups: aPDT (n=30) and nystatin (NYS, n=35). aPDT patients received 6 aPDT sessions, three times a week for 15 days, which involved PDZ (200 mg/L) topical application (20 min) on the palate and upper denture, followed by light emitting diode (LED) illumination (660 nm, 50 J/cm²). NYS patients were instructed to rinse one dropper of this medication for one minute, four times a day, for 15 days. Microbiological collections of dentures and palates were performed and cultured on blood agar and CHROMAgar Candida. Microbial viability was determined, and photographs of the palates were taken for clinical evaluation. Data were analyzed by Repeated Measure Linear Model and Bonferroni (p≤0.05).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
65

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Edentulous denture wearers clinically diagnosed with denture stomatitis.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients who received antibiotics, antifungal or steroids in the past 3 months prior to the beginning of the research, women in the reproductive phase, patients who had worn the same denture in the past 10 years, diabetics, anemics, immunocompromised and under cancer treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy
Patients treated with Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy
Procedure: Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy
Experimental: Nystatin
Patients treated with Nystatin antifungal drug.
Drug: Nystatin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Microbial Viability at baseline
Time Frame: The recovery of microorganisms was performed before the tretaments (at the baseline - initial).
The efficacy of the treatments was verified microbiologically at the baseline (initial). For each patient, oral swabs were rubbed onto the palatal mucosa and on the tissue surface of the denture for 1 minute to recover the microorganisms. Each swab was placed into a Falcon tube (Corning, New York, USA) containing 5 mL of 0.9% sterile saline solution and vortexed for 1 minute to suspend the microorganisms from the swab. To evaluate Candida spp. survival and to presumptively identify Candida species by colony color, serial 10-fold dilutions from 100 to 103 were plated in duplicate on Chromagar Candida and incubated at 30 °C for 5 days. Additionally, to assess the total microbiota survival (fungal and bacteria), serial 10-fold dilutions from 102 to 104 were plated onto Blood agar.
The recovery of microorganisms was performed before the tretaments (at the baseline - initial).
Microbial Viability at the end of the treatments
Time Frame: The recovery of microorganisms was performed immediately at the end of the treatments.
The efficacy of the treatments was verified microbiologically immediately at the end of the treatments. For each patient, oral swabs were rubbed onto the palatal mucosa and on the tissue surface of the denture for 1 minute to recover the microorganisms. Each swab was placed into a Falcon tube (Corning, New York, USA) containing 5 mL of 0.9% sterile saline solution and vortexed for 1 minute to suspend the microorganisms from the swab. To evaluate Candida spp. survival and to presumptively identify Candida species by colony color, serial 10-fold dilutions from 100 to 103 were plated in duplicate on Chromagar Candida and incubated at 30 °C for 5 days. Additionally, to assess the total microbiota survival (fungal and bacteria), serial 10-fold dilutions from 102 to 104 were plated onto Blood agar.
The recovery of microorganisms was performed immediately at the end of the treatments.
Microbial Viability on day 15
Time Frame: The recovery of microorganisms was performed on day 15 after the end of the treatments.
The efficacy of the treatments was verified microbiologically on day 15 after the end of the treatments. For each patient, oral swabs were rubbed onto the palatal mucosa and on the tissue surface of the denture for 1 minute to recover the microorganisms. Each swab was placed into a Falcon tube (Corning, New York, USA) containing 5 mL of 0.9% sterile saline solution and vortexed for 1 minute to suspend the microorganisms from the swab. To evaluate Candida spp. survival and to presumptively identify Candida species by colony color, serial 10-fold dilutions from 100 to 103 were plated in duplicate on Chromagar Candida and incubated at 30 °C for 5 days. Additionally, to assess the total microbiota survival (fungal and bacteria), serial 10-fold dilutions from 102 to 104 were plated onto Blood agar.
The recovery of microorganisms was performed on day 15 after the end of the treatments.
Microbial Viability on day 30
Time Frame: The recovery of microorganisms was performed on day 30 after the end of the treatments.
The efficacy of the treatments was verified microbiologically on day 30 after the end of the treatments. For each patient, oral swabs were rubbed onto the palatal mucosa and on the tissue surface of the denture for 1 minute to recover the microorganisms. Each swab was placed into a Falcon tube (Corning, New York, USA) containing 5 mL of 0.9% sterile saline solution and vortexed for 1 minute to suspend the microorganisms from the swab. To evaluate Candida spp. survival and to presumptively identify Candida species by colony color, serial 10-fold dilutions from 100 to 103 were plated in duplicate on Chromagar Candida and incubated at 30 °C for 5 days. Additionally, to assess the total microbiota survival (fungal and bacteria), serial 10-fold dilutions from 102 to 104 were plated onto Blood agar.
The recovery of microorganisms was performed on day 30 after the end of the treatments.
Microbial Viability on day 45
Time Frame: The recovery of microorganisms was performed on day 45 after the end of the treatments.
The efficacy of the treatments was verified microbiologically on day 45 after the end of the treatments. For each patient, oral swabs were rubbed onto the palatal mucosa and on the tissue surface of the denture for 1 minute to recover the microorganisms. Each swab was placed into a Falcon tube (Corning, New York, USA) containing 5 mL of 0.9% sterile saline solution and vortexed for 1 minute to suspend the microorganisms from the swab. To evaluate Candida spp. survival and to presumptively identify Candida species by colony color, serial 10-fold dilutions from 100 to 103 were plated in duplicate on Chromagar Candida and incubated at 30 °C for 5 days. Additionally, to assess the total microbiota survival (fungal and bacteria), serial 10-fold dilutions from 102 to 104 were plated onto Blood agar.
The recovery of microorganisms was performed on day 45 after the end of the treatments.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical evaluation
Time Frame: Standardized photographs of the palates were taken prior to the beginning of the treatments (initial) and up to 45 days after the end of the treatments.
To verify the clinical efficacy of the treatments, the oral lesions on the palatal mucosal were evaluated. For this, standardized photographs of the palates were taken prior to the beginning of the treatments (initial) and up to 45 days after the end of the treatments. All the photographs were taken with the same digital camera (NIKON D7000, Tokyo, Japan), by the same operator, under the same conditions (place, light, position). After that, all photographs were analyzed by two individuals blinded to the treatment performed, to classify the oral lesion in type I, II or III in all time intervals.
Standardized photographs of the palates were taken prior to the beginning of the treatments (initial) and up to 45 days after the end of the treatments.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
São Paulo State University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 2, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 2, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 25, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 31, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 31, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 25, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • FoAr

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Health Care Associated Infection

Clinical Trials on Nystatin

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings