The Effect Of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation In Patients With Stroke
The Effect Of Sham Controlled Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation And Low Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation On Upper Extremity Spasticity And Functional Recovery In Patients With Ischemic Stroke
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Çankaya
-
Ankara, Çankaya, Turkey, 06100
- Gaziler PMR, Training and Research Hospital, Department of PMR
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ischemic stroke with a disease interval of 6 months to 2 years
- aged between 18-80 years
- Mini mental test score ≥ 24
- upper limb Brunnstrom recovery stage 3 to 5
- upper extremity (elbow, wrist and finger) spasticity level Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) 1+ to 3
Exclusion Criteria:
- hemorrhagic stroke
- history of epilepsy
- a cardiac pacemaker
- pregnancy
- history of previous stroke or ischemic attack
- neurological diseases other than stroke
- metallic implant in brain or scalp (including cochlear implant)
- previous brain surgery
- orthopedic disease that prevents upper extremity movements
- poor general health (due to heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, severe infection, etc.)
- diagnosis of malignancy
- injections of botulinum toxin in the last 6 months for the affected upper extremity
- drug or dosage changes of anti-spasticity medications in the last 1 month period
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Active rTMS group
chronic ischemic stroke patients receiving active low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy and physical therapy
|
10 sessions of intact hemispheric upper extremity motor area (M1) were targeted and inhibitor rTMS was applied with a frequency of 1 Hz consisting of 1200 pulses for 20 minutes.
In addition, within 30 minutes after TMS sessions, all patients underwent 10 sessions of joint range of motion, stretching, strengthening, balance and coordination exercises, hand rehabilitation and daily living activities.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Active cTBS group
chronic ischemic stroke patients receiving active continuous theta burst stimulation therapy and physical therapy
|
10 sessions of intact hemispheric upper extremity motor area (M1) were targeted and cTBS was administered for a total of 600 pulses consisting of 3 burst stimulations of 50 Hz repeated every 200 milliseconds for 40 seconds.
In addition, within 30 minutes after TMS sessions, all patients underwent 10 sessions of joint range of motion, stretching, strengthening, balance and coordination exercises, hand rehabilitation and daily living activities.
Other Names:
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham cTBS group
chronic ischemic stroke patients receiving sham continuous theta burst stimulation therapy and physical therapy
|
10 sessions of intact hemispheric upper extremity motor area (M1) were targeted and sham cTBS was administered for a total of 600 pulses consisting of 3 burst stimulations of 50 Hz repeated every 200 milliseconds for 40 seconds.
In addition, within 30 minutes after TMS sessions, all patients underwent 10 sessions of joint range of motion, stretching, strengthening, balance and coordination exercises, hand rehabilitation and daily living activities.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Motor Function Scale
Time Frame: up to 6 weeks
|
Scale measures level of upper extremity motor functions (min-max: 18-126 points).
Higher values represent a better outcome.
|
up to 6 weeks
|
|
Modified Ashworth Scale
Time Frame: up to 6 weeks
|
Scale measures muscle tone (spasticity) (min-max:0-4).
Higher values represent a worse outcome.
|
up to 6 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Functional Independence Measure
Time Frame: up to 6 weeks
|
Scale measures level of independence on activities of daily life (min-max: 18-126 points).
Self-care part of the motor subscale was used in this study (min-max:6-42 points).
Higher values represent a better outcome.
|
up to 6 weeks
|
|
Motor Activity Log-28
Time Frame: up to 6 weeks
|
Scale measures frequency of use and functionality level of the affected upper limb during daily activities (min-max: 0-5 points).
Higher values represent a better outcome.
|
up to 6 weeks
|
|
Brunnstrom Motor Recovery Scale
Time Frame: up to 6 weeks
|
Scale measures upper extremity and hand motor recovery stages (min-max: 1-6).
Higher values represent a better outcome.
|
up to 6 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Bilge Yılmaz, Professor,MD, Gaziler PMR, Training and Research Hospital, Department of PMR
- Principal Investigator: Ömer Kuzu, MD, Gaziler PMR, Training and Research Hospital, Department of PMR
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 5
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.