Impact of Minimally Invasive Restorative Techniques on Pregnant Women Oral Health Related Quality of Life
Impact of Minimally Invasive Restorative Techniques on Pregnant Women Oral Health Related Quality of Life: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Alexandria, Egypt, 21527
- Family Health Centers
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Having at least one carious lesion involving dentine with lesion accessible to hand instruments (International Caries Detection and Assessment System score= 5 or 6).
- Suffering from at least mild dental pain as identified by a score of at least 5mm on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 100-mm-long.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant women with acute pulpitis, swelling or fistula.
- Uncooperative patients and those who refused to participate.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Papacarie-Duo
|
First, tooth was cleaned with a wet cotton pellet.
The gel was inserted using disposable syringe tip into the cavity and its color changed from clear to cloudy indicating the presence of infected tissues.
After 40 seconds, the softened carious tissue was removed using excavator by gentle pressure.
The remaining gel was removed with a cotton pellet.
The procedure was repeated until there was no change in the gel color indicating that there was no more infected tissue.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Atraumatic Restorative Treatment
|
The tooth was cleaned with a wet cotton pellet to remove debris and plaque and then isolated with cotton rolls to promote a dry environment.
Caries was removed using a sharp excavator and the cavity was cleaned using a small wet cotton pellet and dried with a dry cotton pellet.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Oral Health Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: up to 6 months
|
This was assessed by measuring changes between the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14).
The OHIP-14 includes 14 questions in seven dimensions with two questions for each dimension: functional limitation, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, social disability and handicap.
Responses to the OHIP-14 items were measured on a 5-pont Likert scale ranging from never = 0; hardly ever = 1; occasionally = 2; fairly often = 3; to very often = 4.
The OHIP-14 score is the sum of the scores of the 14 statements and ranges from 0 to 56 and from 0 to 8 for each dimension with higher scores indicating higher frequency of negative impact.
|
up to 6 months
|
|
Retention of the final restoration
Time Frame: up to 6 months
|
The scoring system was as follows: 0=present, without defect; 1=present, small defects on the margin measuring less than 0.5 mm in depth, with no need for repair; 2=present, small defects on the margin measuring 0.5 to 1.0 mm in depth, with need for repair; 3=present, gross defects on the margin measuring 1.0 mm or more in depth, with need for repair; 4=absent, restoration completely lost, need for treatment; 5=absent, other treatment had been performed for some reason; 6=tooth absent for some reason; 7=present, wear on surface less than 0.5 mm, with no need for replacement; 8=present, wear on surface greater than 0.5 mm, with need for replacement; 9=diagnosis impossible.
Restorations having a score of 0, 1 or 7 were considered successful and those receiving a score of 2, 3, 4 or 8 were considered failures.
|
up to 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: May M Adham, M.Sc, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt
- Study Director: Mona K ElKashlan, PhD, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt
- Study Director: Wafaa E Abdelaziz, PhD, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Wewers ME, Lowe NK. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health. 1990 Aug;13(4):227-36. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770130405.
- Matsumoto SF, Motta LJ, Alfaya TA, Guedes CC, Fernandes KP, Bussadori SK. Assessment of chemomechanical removal of carious lesions using Papacarie Duo: randomized longitudinal clinical trial. Indian J Dent Res. 2013 Jul-Aug;24(4):488-92. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.118393.
- Al Habashneh R, Khader YS, Salameh S. Use of the Arabic version of Oral Health Impact Profile-14 to evaluate the impact of periodontal disease on oral health-related quality of life among Jordanian adults. J Oral Sci. 2012 Mar;54(1):113-20. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.54.113.
- Kikwilu EN, Frencken J, Mulder J. Impact of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) on the treatment profile in pilot government dental clinics in Tanzania. BMC Oral Health. 2009 Jun 8;9:14. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-9-14.
- Musskopf ML, Milanesi FC, Rocha JMD, Fiorini T, Moreira CHC, Susin C, Rosing CK, Weidlich P, Oppermann RV. Oral health related quality of life among pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:e002. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0002. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
- Freitas MCCA, Fagundes TC, Modena KCDS, Cardia GS, Navarro MFL. Randomized clinical trial of encapsulated and hand-mixed glass-ionomer ART restorations: one-year follow-up. J Appl Oral Sci. 2018 Jan 18;26:e20170129. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0129.
- Motta LJ, Bussadori SK, Campanelli AP, Silva AL, Alfaya TA, Godoy CH, Navarro MF. Efficacy of Papacarie((R)) in reduction of residual bacteria in deciduous teeth: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2014;69(5):319-22. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2014(05)04.
- Adham MM, El Kashlan MK, Abdelaziz WE, Rashad AS. Comparison of two minimally invasive restorative techniques in improving the oral health-related quality of life of pregnant women: a six months randomized controlled trial. BMC Oral Health. 2021 Apr 30;21(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01581-5.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- minimally invasive & OHRQoL
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.