Fibrin for Chronic Multi-level Discogenic Low Back Pain

November 5, 2020 updated by: Pauza, Kevin, MD

A Prospective Registry Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Fibrin for Chronic Multi-level Discogenic Low Back Pain

Intra-annular injections of non-autologous fibrin for moderate to severe chronic low back pain (LBP).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to analyze data available in the PIs Regenerative Orthobiologics Registry (ROR) and corresponding patient charts that will either support or refute the efficacy of Intra-annular fibrin as treatment for moderate to severe low back pain. Additionally, we seek to retrospectively identify possible predisposing factors that are correlated with positive outcomes with respect to patient-reported pain and function.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
400

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Texas
      • Tyler, Texas, United States, 75701
        • Recruiting
        • Interventional Spine Specialist
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Recipient of Intra-annular fibrin injection for annular defects identified radographically and by annulogram

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Scoliosis greater than 20 degrees
  • Spondylolysis
  • Spondylolisthesis greater than Grade 1
  • Disc extrusion
  • Disc herniations or bulges > 4mm causing severe stenosis
  • Prior lumbar surgery or intradiscal procedure (i.e. intradiscal electrothermal therapy, nucleoplasty)
  • Cauda equina syndrome
  • Active malignancy or tumor as source of symptoms
  • Evidence of prior lumbar vertebral body fracture or trauma
  • Foraminal stenosis at the affected levels resulting in severe thecal sac compression
  • Dynamic instability on lumbar flexion/extension radiographs
  • Positive response to diagnostic medial branch block or facet joint injection or sacroiliac joint injection
  • Known bleeding disorder
  • Known or suspected hypersensitivity or allergy to drugs or components of the fibrin sealant, including aprotinin, used in the procedure
  • Presence of ferromagnetic implants that would interfere with MRI evaluations
  • Active or pending workers' compensation claims or other litigation related to the condition.
  • Pregnant or plans to become pregnant over the course of study participation (2 years)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Fibrin Group
Experimental: Non-Autologuos Fibrin (NAF) Subjects in the NAF arm received an injection of non-autologous fibrin
Drug: Fibrin sealant
The intra-annular delivery of non-autologous fibrin into the annulus
Other Names:
  • Baxter Tisseel

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: Two Years
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a questionnaire used by clinicians and researchers to quantify disability for low back pain. Scale for the ODI is from 0 (best) - 100 (worst).
Two Years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: Two Years
The NRS consists of a numeric version of the visual analog scale. It is labeled from zero to ten, with zero being an example of someone with no pain and ten being the worst pain possible. Scale for NRS is from 0 (best) - 10 (worst).
Two Years
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back pain
Time Frame: Two Years
When responding to a VAS item, respondents specify their level of agreement to a statement by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points. Scale for VAS for back pain is from 0 (best) - 10 (worst).
Two Years
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg pain
Time Frame: Two Years
When responding to a VAS item, respondents specify their level of agreement to a statement by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points. Scale for VAS for leg pain is from 0 (best) - 10 (wors
Two Years
PROMIS Physical Health
Time Frame: Two Years
The PROMIS Global-10 is a publicly available global health assessment tool that allows measurements of symptoms, functioning, and healthcare-related quality of life (HRQoL) for a wide variety of chronic diseases and conditions. Scale for PROMIS Physical Health is from 16.2 (worst) - 67.7 (best)
Two Years
PROMIS Mental Health
Time Frame: Two Years
The PROMIS Global-10 is a publicly available global health assessment tool that allows measurements of symptoms, functioning, and healthcare-related quality of life (HRQoL) for a wide variety of chronic diseases and conditions. Scale for PROMIS Mental Health is from 21.2 (worst) - 67.6 (best).
Two Years
North American Spine Society (NASS) for patient satisfaction
Time Frame: Two Years
The North American Spine Society (NASS) developed an outcome assessment instrument to measure diverse dimensions of the impact of lumbar spine problems. Scale range is from 1 to 4 (best to worst).
Two Years
EURO Quality of Life (EuroQol)
Time Frame: Two Years
EuroQol is an instrument which evaluates the generic quality of life developed in Europe and widely used. Scale is from 0.33 (worst - 0.88 (best).
Two Years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Pauza, Kevin, MD

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Kevin Pauza, MD, Interventional Spine Specialist

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 11, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 5, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 5, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 9, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 5, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Regen_006-0120

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings