Effect of Dental Pulp Stem Cells and L-PRF After Impacted Third Molar Extraction
Effect of Dental Pulp Stem Cells and L-PRF Placed Into the Extraction Sockets of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars on the Periodontal Status of Adjacent Second Molars: a Split Mouth Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ankara, Turkey, 06540
- Baskent University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged between 18 and 30 years
- Bilateral impacted LM3 extraction surgeries requirement
Exclusion Criteria:
- Having clinical signs or symptoms of abscess or cellulitis formation
- Having a history of radiotherapy
- Having any systemic diseases interfering with wound healing and/or smokers
- Patients who had been diagnosed as periodontitis
- Patients who had LM2s with caries or restorations that have an unidentifiable cementoenamel junction
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
- Masking: DOUBLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: L-PRF + DPSC
Mandibular third molars were extracted and DPSC with L-PRF placed into the socket.
|
After surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars, extraction sockets were filled with L-PRF membranes + DPSCs.
Other Names:
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: L-PRF
Mandibular third molars were extracted and L-PRF placed into the socket
|
After surgical removal of impacted contralateral mandibular third molars, each extraction sockets were only filled with L-PRF membranes.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Probing pocket Depth (PPD)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Probing pocket Depth (PPD) is the distance between gingival margin and bottom of the periodontal pocket in mm.
|
6 months
|
|
Clinical attachment level (CAL)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Clinical attachment level (CAL) is the distance between cemento-enamel junction and bottom of the periodontal pocket in mm.
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Radiographic vertical distance
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and the most coronal point of the alveolar bone were identified (AC) on the mesial and distal of lower second molars on digital panoramic radiographs.
The vertical ruler on each digital image was used to calibrate the image and to convert measurements from pixels to millimeters with ImageJ.
The vertical distance (VD) between cemento-enamel junction and alveolar crest of the lower second molar was than measured with "straight line" tool of the software.
In order to calculate the real distance; ertical distance was divided to the magnification factor for panoramic image (1.2).
|
6 months
|
|
Relative bone density (rBD)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
For every extraction socket, a region of interest (ROI) is created for the socket region and one for the surrounding bone using the "Freehand Selection" tool of ImageJ software on panoramic radiographs.
Mean grey values were recorded for each group and relative bone density (rBD) was calculated.
|
6 months
|
|
Post-operative pain as assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 7 days
|
Self-reported pain measured in a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) in which (0) denoted "no pain" and 100 meant "severe pain" was recorded at the end of the surgery and 7 days after extraction.
|
7 days
|
|
Assessment of analgesic usage
Time Frame: 7 days
|
The patients were asked to note the amount of analgesics within the post-operative 7 days.
|
7 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Emine Alaaddinoğlu, Prof,PhD, Baskent University
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- SecilC
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.