Injection of Hyaluronic Acid Versus Corticosteroid for Treatment of Trigger Finger

November 25, 2020 updated by: Sahar Said Khalil, Dubai Health Authority

Ultrasound-Guided Injection of Hyaluronic Acid Versus Corticosteroid for Treatment of Trigger Finger: Randomized Controlled Study

The aim of the study is to compare the therapeutic effects of hyaluronic acid versus steroid injections in treating trigger fingers using ultrasound guidance

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

A prospective randomized controlled study designed to compare the outcomes of injecting patients with trigger finger with hyaluronic acid versus corticosteroid under ultrasound guidance

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United Arab Emirates
      • Dubai, United Arab Emirates
        • Recruiting
        • Dubai Hospital- Dubai Health Authority
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sahar Khalil, SSR
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Mohamed Abdulla

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult (>18 years)
  • Patients with a clinical diagnosis of trigger finger grade 1-3 on the Quinnell grading scale and confirmed diagnosis by ultrasound.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Quinnell's classification grade IV (contracture)
  • Prior injection within 6 months
  • Prior operation of the affected finger
  • Presence of any contracture in the proximal interphalangeal or metacarpophalangeal joint, and
  • History of diabetes, hypothyroidism, and
  • Rheumatic or connective tissue disease
  • Allergy to triamcinolone or hyaluronic acid
  • Pregnancy
  • Secondary triggering e.g. Trauma, infection
  • Trigger finger symptoms duration >6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Hyaluronic acid
1mL of hyaluronic acid (20 mg/2 mL; Hyalgan, Fidia, Abano Terme, Italy) infiltration at A1-Pulley under ultrasound guidance after subcutaneous 2% lidocaine without epinephrine infiltration of the skin overlying the A1-pulley.
Drug: hyaluronic acid (20 mg/2 mL)
A1-Pulley infiltration for trigger finger
Other Names:
  • Hyalgan 20 mg in 2 ML Prefilled Syringe
Active Comparator: Triamcinolone acetonide
1 mL of Triamcinolone acetonide 10mg/ml infiltration at A1-Pulley under ultrasound guidance after subcutaneous 2% lidocaine without epinephrine infiltration of the skin overlying the A1 pulley.
Drug: Triamcinolone acetonide 10mg/ml
A1-Pulley infiltration for trigger finger
Other Names:
  • Kenalog 10 mg/ml

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Quinnell trigger finger grading system:
Time Frame: 1 and 3 months post-injection
Change in Quinnell grading overtime within 3 months after injection. Trigger fingers are rated as follows: Grade 0: normal finger movements, Grade 1: uneven finger movements, Grade 2: actively correctable triggering, Grade 3: passively correctable triggering, and Grade 4: locked digit.
1 and 3 months post-injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain
Time Frame: 1 and 3 months post-injection
Change in pain Visual analogue scale will be recorded. The patient marks on the 100 mm in length line the point that he/she feels to represent his/her perception of pain at the current state. The VAS score is determined by measuring in millimetres from the left hand end of the line to the point that the patient marks ( a higher score indicates greater pain intensity). Categorization of none, mild, moderate and severe pain will be also used (none = 0, mild = 1-4, moderate = 5-6, and severe = 7-10).
1 and 3 months post-injection
Frequency of tender trigger nodules
Time Frame: 1 and 3 months post-injection
Identifying the presence of tender nodules at A1-pulley of the affected finger by palpation
1 and 3 months post-injection
The Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score
Time Frame: 1 and 3 months post-injection
Patients will be asked to fill a questionnaire form. It is an 11-item form that assesses the upper limb function on a scale of 1-5, with scores ranging from 11 to 55, with the higher scores representing more disability and worse upper limb function.
1 and 3 months post-injection
Changes in Grip strength
Time Frame: 1 and 3 months post-injection
Measured by the dynamometer strength test (Jamar grip dynamometer)
1 and 3 months post-injection
Patient satisfaction with therapy
Time Frame: 1 and 3 months post-injection
Participating patients will be asked to classify their result into 1 of 4 categories: (1) complete resolution of symptoms, (2) improved result, but incomplete resolution of symptoms, not warranting further treatment, (3) partial response, but unsatisfactory, warranting further treatment, and (4) no response.
1 and 3 months post-injection
Ultrasound evaluation of A1-Pulley
Time Frame: 1 and 3 months post-injection
Detailed ultrasonography evaluation of A1-Pulley. Comparing the A1-Pulley ultrasonographic parameters over 3 months after injection (at the follow-up appointment)
1 and 3 months post-injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Dubai Health Authority

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sahar S Khalil, SSR, Specialist Senior Registrar- Physical Medicine and rehabilitation Department- Dubai hospital
  • Study Chair: Mohamed M Abdulla, Consultant, Consultant and Head of Physical Medicine and rehabilitation Department- Dubai hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 6, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 5, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 4, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 4, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 25, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 27, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 25, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • DSREC-12/2019_03

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings