Autologous Fat in Peripheral Nerve Injury

December 3, 2020 updated by: Ahmed ElSayed Sharaf Ahmed, Assiut University

Use of Autologous Fat to Improve Functional Outcomes After Upper Limb Nerve Injuries

The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of autologous fat graft in enhancing peripheral nerve regeneration. The investigators hypothesize that fat grafting will allow for faster and greater recovery of motor and sensory function following surgical repair of injured peripheral nerves.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Traumatic injuries to peripheral nerves are a frequent finding after hand trauma. High morbidity after nerve injuries mainly affects the younger and working population, with consequent decrease in life quality and productivity .

Even in direct nerve repair and microsurgical nerve coaptation, regeneration is often suboptimal with incomplete target reinnervation. Suboptimal outcome is attributed to axonal degeneration, fibrotic scar formation, and neuromas at the site of injury.

The use of adipose tissue has become very popular in tissue engineering and reconstructive surgery in recent years. It is proposed as a "regenerative tool" for various tissues, including peripheral nerves, because it offers an effective and minimally invasive procedure for obtaining stem cells.

Unprocessed fat grafting can provide a simple approach to improve peripheral nerve regeneration by means of neoangiogenesis & inflammatory response modulation. Furthermore, it serves as a good protective barrier in peripheral nerve surgery, reducing fibrosis and adhesions.

A recent study advocated by Tuncel et al, concluded that combined use of autologous fat graft with surgical repair methods induced significantly better regeneration in rats [3]. In another study by Kilic et al, using adipose tissue flap in a crush injury model in rats was found to be superior to other groups in myelin thickness, nerve fiber density, axon count, and functional recovery at 4 weeks. They concluded that fat tissue seems to promote nerve regeneration because of its stem cell content.

To our knowledge, no prior studies have examined the use of fat graft in peripheral nerve repair in humans. So, the investigators proposed this clinical study to evaluate the outcomes of primary nerve repair combined with autologous fat graft in peripheral nerve injuries.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
44

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 65 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Acute median or ulnar nerve lacerations below elbow

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Old Nerve lacerations > 48 hours
  • Nerve gap which requires nerve grafting
  • Psychosocial issues that would limit participation and compliance

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Group (A): Primary nerve repair with autologous fat graft
Standard nerve repair will be performed with 9/0 nylon sutures, under magnification by an operating microscope with autologous fat grafting around site of repair
Procedure: Autologous Fat Grafting
  • The fat grafts will be harvested from the abdomen or lateral thighs in a closed sterile system, then prepared according to Coleman guidelines. The blood and oil layers are then separated from the adipose tissue.
  • The lipoaspirate will be injected based on a technique described by Vaienti et al, by 17-gaug cannula which will be inserted through the skin around the main incision at the nerve repair site, and the fat graft will be injected after closure of the skin.
Procedure: Primary Nerve Repair
Standard Epineural nerve repairs will be performed with 9/0 nylon sutures, under magnification by an operating microscope.
Active Comparator: Group (B): Standard primary nerve repair
Standard nerve repair will be performed with 9/0 nylon sutures, under magnification by an operating microscope without fat grafting.
Procedure: Primary Nerve Repair
Standard Epineural nerve repairs will be performed with 9/0 nylon sutures, under magnification by an operating microscope.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified British Medical Research Council, sensory grading
Time Frame: 6-12 months
standardized clinical assessment of sensory function using two-point discrimination and monofilament testing by a score from S0 to S4; the higher score indicates better sensation
6-12 months
Modified British Medical Research Council, motor grading
Time Frame: 6-12 months
standardized clinical assessment of motor function on a scale from M0 to M5; the higher score indicates better strength.
6-12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nerve conduction study
Time Frame: 6-12 months
measure for amplitude of response, latency of response and velocity of response measurements.
6-12 months
Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score
Time Frame: 6-12 months
self-administered region-specific outcome instrument developed as a measure of self-rated upper-extremity disability and symptoms. The DASH consists mainly of a 30-item disability/symptom scale, scored 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability)
6-12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Assiut University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Tarek A El-Gammal, MD, Assiut University Hospital - Orthopaedics & Traumatology Dept.
  • Study Chair: Youssef S Hassan, MD, Assiut University Hospitals - Plastic Surgery Dept.
  • Study Director: Awny M Asklany, MD, Assiut University Hospitals - Plastic Surgery Dept.
  • Principal Investigator: Ahmed S Sharaf, MsC, Assiut University Hospitals - Plastic Surgery Dept.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 27, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 27, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 4, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 3, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Fat for Nerve Injury

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nerve Injury

Clinical Trials on Autologous Fat Grafting

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings