EORTC-endorsed, Prospective European Multicenter Imaging Survey and Protocol

January 25, 2021 updated by: Marcus Unterrainer, Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich

Towards Standardization of mCRC Imaging - an EORTC-endorsed, Prospective European Multicenter Imaging Survey and Imaging Protocol

A prospective, multicenter imaging Delphi survey among European radiological societies for mCRC imaging standardization.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND: Computed Tomography (CT) is the imaging reference standard for initial staging and response assessment in randomized, controlled clinical trials (RCT) dealing with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, comparability of imaging data among recruiting centers in RCTs is highly hampered by diverging imaging protocols and different technical specifications. Over the last years, analysis of radiomic features in mCRC patients has gained increasing interest for image evaluation beyond the mere assessment of extent. Also, these radiomic features are highly susceptible to technical parameters such as slice thickness. Hence, comparability of radiomic features among recruiting centers are also highly limited due to diverging imaging protocols.

AIMS: This prospective, multicenter imaging survey aims at assessing current differences regarding mCRC CT imaging protocols and technical specifications among large academic sites in Europe and at drafting a consensus imaging protocol endorsed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC).

METHODS: This survey will be in close cooperation of the EORTC Imaging Group, EORTC Gastro-intestinal Tract Group, European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR). Among the EORTC Imaging Group, EORTC Gastro-intestinal Tract Group, ESOI and ESGAR, imaging experts will be prospectively recruited and will serve as expert panelists in this prospective survey. Following the Delphi approach for survey conduction, several survey rounds will be performed. The answers of each survey round will be analyzed by the survey facilitators, blinded results will then be forwarded to the expert panelists prior to every following survey round. Statements / answers can then be modified by the expert panelists in the following survey round.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
    • Bavaria
      • Munich, Bavaria, Germany, 81377
        • Dept. of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Imaging experts will serve as expert panelists in the Delphi Survey and will undergo several rounds of blinded questionnaires.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Researchers / academics with expertise in gastro-intestinal / oncologic imaging
  • Association with EORTC Imaging Group, EORTC GI Group, ESGAR or ESOI.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants not meeting the inclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Expert panelists
Expert panelists will be recruited from EORTC Imaging Group, EORTC GI Group, ESOI and ESGAR and will actively participate in the imaging survey rounds.
Other: Imaging survey
Participation as expert panelist in the imaging survey.
Facilitators
The two central facilitators will moderate and guide the survey rounds. Blinded results will be forwarded to the expert panelists by the facilitators. Further Survey rounds will be adapted by the facilitators according to the previous answers given by the panelists.
Other: Facilitation
Moderation and evaluation of the expert panel's answers. Adoption and moderation of further survey rounds.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Standardized imaging protocol consensus among panelists
Time Frame: 6 months after finalization of the last survey round
Standardized imaging protocol among panelists after multiple rounds of Delphi consensus survey (technical parameters, e. g. contrast phases, oral contrast etc.)
6 months after finalization of the last survey round

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Description of technical comparability of datasets for radiomic and AI analyses
Time Frame: 6 months after finalization of the last survey round
During the Delphi-survey, local information regarding technical specifications in their departments (e. g. vendor, scanner type, contrast phases, slice thickness, oral contrast, kV, etc.) will be enquired. The results will be reported as descriptive statistics, e. g. on percentage distribution of a particular technical feature. This analyses will be performed with special regards to technical parameters that knowingly have a major impact on reproducibility of Radiomics features.
6 months after finalization of the last survey round
Description of heterogeneity of mCRC imaging protocols
Time Frame: 6 months after finalization of the last survey round
During the Delphi-survey, local information regarding technical specifications in their departments (e. g. vendor, scanner type, contrast phases, slice thickness, oral contrast, kV, etc.) will be enquired. The results will be reported as descriptive statistics, e. g. on percentage distribution of a particular technical feature.
6 months after finalization of the last survey round

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
EORTC Imaging Group
EORTC Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group
European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI)
European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Marcus Unterrainer, Dept. of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich
  • Principal Investigator: Wolfgang G Kunz, Dept. of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 26, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 25, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 4, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 7, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 26, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 25, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • EORTC imaging survey

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Imaging survey

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings