Assessment of the Correlation Between Serum Levels of Adropin and Degree of Severity of Chronic Liver Disease

December 8, 2020 updated by: Yotam Kolben, Hadassah Medical Organization

Injury to the liver parenchyma associated with an influx of acute or chronic inflammatory cells is termed hepatitis. Cirrhosis refers to a progressive, diffuse, fibrosing, nodular condition that disrupts the entire normal architecture of the liver. Patients with chronic liver disease have sustained hepatic inflammation, fibrosis, and aberrant hepatocyte regeneration. These abnormalities can cause cirrhosis and favor a series of genetic and epigenetic events that culminate in the formation of dysplastic nodules, which are actually preneoplastic lesions . Hepatocellular carcinoma can also arise in patients who have chronic liver disease but does not have established cirrhosis or marked inflammation.

The "gold standard" for evaluation and follow up of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis is liver biopsy. It's a costly procedure with risks of severe complications, with sampling error and problematic long term follow up. Non-invasive tools are broadly used with good results, but none of the commonly used methods is perfect. In one meta-analysis, different methods were compared for diagnosis of cirrhosis in Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients. For example (sensitivity; specificity): APRI (56.2% ;83.6%), FibroScan M Probe (78.2%; 90.8%), MRE (86.6%; 93.4%) . Child-Pugh classification and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores are used as measures for assessment of degree of severity of liver disease. These models have some drawbacks; Ascites and encephalopathy included in Child-Pugh classification are subjective and may be variable according to the physician's judgment and the use of diuretics and lactulose. INR which appears in both methods does not sufficiently reflect coagulopathy and liver function and is also variable throughout different laboratories. Both are not sensitive enough for short interval periods.

One of the major complications of cirrhosis and chronic hepatitis is Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Most guidelines recommend cirrhotic patients to undergo abdominal ultrasound every 6 much to detect HCC, given the expected tumor growth rate in the target population. Although widely use, the combination of ultrasound (US) with Alpha fetoprotein (AFP) is not recommended for surveillance in patients with active liver inflammation as the 6-8% gain in the detection rate does not counterbalance the increase in false positive results. Like in previous issues, a specific, cost effective marker is still needed.

Adropin is a 76-amino-acids secreted peptide, which is encoded by the Enho gene. The exact physiological role of Adropin in the liver is unknown. However, high levels of Adropin are correlated with low incidence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, higher levels of HDL cholesterol, lower body-mass index (BMI), LDL cholesterol, Triglyceride levels and blood pressure.

Obesity has been recognized long ago as a significant risk factor for developing cancer and is an independent risk factor for HCC in patients with alcoholic (odds ratio 3.2) and cryptogenic (odds ratio 11.1) cirrhosis Serum Adropin levels were decreased and negatively correlated with liver injury in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) mice. Knockout of Adropin significantly exacerbated hepatic steatosis, inflammatory responses and fibrosis in mice. Furthermore, the treatment with Adropin bioactive peptides slowed NASH progression in mice.

In search for a good diagnostic and prognostic marker in patients with liver disease, Adropin should be further investigated in humans.

In this Open-label, single-center study, 50 adults (>18) male and female with any degree of chronic liver disease will undergo a single blood test for serum levels of Adropin. Levels will be measured using ELISA technique. The results will be compared with the Child Pugh and MELD scores, liver enzymes, lipid profile, coagulation factors and fibroscan results based on the patients' clinical data.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ages Eligible for Study: 18 Years to 80 Years (Adult) Sexes Eligible for Study: All

    1. Diagnosis of chronic liver disease of any etiology.
    2. Females of childbearing potential must be non-pregnant
    3. No known history of significant neurological, renal, cardiovascular, respiratory (asthma), endocrinological, gastrointestinal, primary hematopoietic disease, neoplasm, or any other clinically significant medical disorder other than liver disease and the metabolic syndrome in patients with NASH.
    4. Patients must satisfy a medical examiner about their fitness to participate in the study.
    5. Patients must provide written informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

- 1. Patients with evidence of other serious infectious, autoimmune, hepatic, nephritic or systemic disease or compromised organ function except for the metabolic syndrome in patients with NASH.

2. Patients with any acute medical situation (e.g. acute infection) within 48 hours of blood tests.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Healthy
Diagnostic test: Blood test for serum Adropin
Blood test for serum Adropin
Other: Child Pugh A
Diagnostic test: Blood test for serum Adropin
Blood test for serum Adropin
Other: Child Pugh B
Diagnostic test: Blood test for serum Adropin
Blood test for serum Adropin
Other: Child Pugh C
Diagnostic test: Blood test for serum Adropin
Blood test for serum Adropin
Other: HCC
Diagnostic test: Blood test for serum Adropin
Blood test for serum Adropin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
correlation between degree of severity of chronic liver disease and serum adropin levels.
Time Frame: 1 year
correlation between degree of severity of chronic liver disease and serum adropin levels.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hadassah Medical Organization

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 25, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 24, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 8, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 9, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 8, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ADROPINHCC- HMO-CTIL

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Liver Disease and Cirrhosis

Clinical Trials on Blood test for serum Adropin

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings