Assessment of the Efficacy of Medrol Dose Pack for Acute Post-Concussive Headaches

May 5, 2023 updated by: Northwell Health

Assessment of the Efficacy of Medrol Dose Pack for Post-Concussive Headaches

This novel pilot project will assess the effectiveness of corticosteroids in treatment of acute post-concussion headache. The investigators hypothesize that the use of corticosteroids will cause significant headache reduction in frequency and/or intensity than individuals who undergo the current standard of care. Additionally, the investigators hypothesize that corticosteroid use will lead to a reduction in other somatic symptoms including vestibular symptoms, leading to quicker return to school, work, and/or ability to play sports.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

To the best of the investigators' knowledge, this is a novel study. Studies have been previously done on individuals who have suffered an acute TBI and were admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) setting but none have been completed on individuals who suffer post-concussion headaches. Despite a high prevalence of post-concussive headache, there are no evidence-based guidelines for acute or preventive pharmacological treatment. Patients who experience very frequent or daily headache post-concussive headache are also at risk of developing medication-overuse headache (MOH)12. In addition, patients with post-concussive headache experience disabling comorbidities such as symptoms of depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances 12 This study will be of benefit to patients who suffer headaches after a concussion because, though various treatments have been studied, including a combination of Reglan and Benadryl (63% effective in one prospective study) triptans vs non-triptans (70% effective vs 42% effective in one retrospective trial), gabapentin vs tricyclic antidepressants vs. no medication (no significant difference in outcome), none have been established as a definitive treatment regimen for post-concussive headache 12. Corticosteroids are currently utilized for management of these headaches; they are done so at the discretion of the physician and like the aforementioned medications, are not standard of care. Corticosteroid used in severe TBI (GCS < 8) have been widely studied8, however the utility has not been conclusive. Of note, case studies in the pediatric population with mild TBI (GCS 13-15) and post-concussive headache, report that they respond well to the Medrol Dose Pack with headache improvement during or after completion of the medication2. Currently, there is no standard treatment of post-concussion headaches, and in clinical practice, it has been observed that only approximately 50% of patients improve without any medication use. It is important to establish the role of corticosteroids in treating post-concussive headaches because they may improve quality of life and accelerate patient's functional recovery.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
25

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • Manhasset, New York, United States, 11030
        • Recruiting
        • NorthWell Health - North Shore University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Dana Klavansky, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Robert Duarte, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Rosanna Sabini, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Luca Giliberto, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be consented for the study. Patients will be recruited when they follow up on their initial appointment after hospitalization

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Provision of signed and dated informed consent form (in person or via telehealth)
  2. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
  3. Male or female, aged >18 years old
  4. Ability to take oral medication and be willing to adhere to the study regimen as described in this protocol
  5. Patients presenting with all types of post-concussive headache with >5/10 in severity on the numerical analog scale.
  6. Headache that occurs for > 4 hours per day
  7. Headache that occurs every day
  8. Headache that began after concussion, patient was diagnosed at an outpatient clinic or was hospitalized
  9. Headache developed within 7 days post-injury and patient presenting within 30 days from initial trauma
  10. A diagnosis of concussion.
  11. If a patient is taking another pain medication, this still be included in the stud

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any evidence of known intracranial hemorrhage on neuroimaging
  2. Headache developing after 7 days post injury and patient presenting after 30 days from initial trauma
  3. Headache occurs < 4 hours per day
  4. Headache does not occur daily
  5. Age < or = 18
  6. Headache is < 5 in severity on numerical analog scale
  7. Presence of increase in intracranial pressure or papilledema
  8. Any contraindication to corticosteroids
  9. Allergy or sensitivity to corticosteroids
  10. Active Tuberculosis
  11. Active pregnancy
  12. Currently on corticosteroids for another reason
  13. Participants with fungal infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in headaches
Time Frame: 1 Week
Defined as change in headache in response to medication
1 Week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in total Post Concussion Symptom (0-120) scores over time
Time Frame: 12 weeks
change in the NEW total PCSS score from baseline (day0) to week 1, to week 4 and to week 12; Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
12 weeks
EQ-5D (Euro Qual Health State Questionnaire) score changes (1-100 in each category); higher score indicates better state of health in several domains.
Time Frame: 12 weeks
EQ-5D score in the categories of 'Usual Activities' and 'Pain/Discomfort' of the EQ-5D Health Questionnaire between visit 1 (day 7) and visit 5(week 11/12)
12 weeks
Diary of other medication use and pain level
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Secondary outcome 9: Each patient will be asked to keep a daily diary, recording pain medications used and a pain level (in a scale of 0-10).
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Northwell Health

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jamie S Ullman, MD, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 22, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 22, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 28, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 9, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 5, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20-1092

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Headache

Clinical Trials on Methylprednisolone

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings