Evaluation of Anti-neutrophil Cytoplasm Antibodies Test

January 19, 2021 updated by: Mai Mahmoud Fahmy Mansour, Sohag University

Evaluation of ANCA Testing by Antigen Specific Assays in Small Vessel Vasculitis

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibodies (ANCA) are defined as important serological markers for the diagnosis of some forms of small vessel vasculitis, including granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) , microscopic polyangiitis(MPA) and to a lesser extent Churg -Strauss syndrome or Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA).So they are called ANCA-associated vasculitis(AAV).

An international consensus statement for ANCA testing statement was issued in 2017 and states that the antigen specific immunoassays can be used for the accurate diagnosis of ANCA-associated vasculitis without the need for indirect immunofluorescence(IIF). In the present study we will test whether the antigen specific assays screening is a valuable alternative to IIF confirming with immunoassay for the diagnosis of AAV on a number of patients and controls.

Aim To evaluate the performance of the recommended strategy for the detection of ANCA based on screening with antigen specific immunoassays on a number of AAV patients and relevant disease controls In Kagawa university hospital (rheumatology department).

Patients and methods This is a prospective study will be conducted at the department of rheumatology in Kagawa university hospital in which consecutive samples will be included from patients suspected to have AAV; patients subsequently identified as having AAV will be included as AAV patients, while patients in which the diagnosis AAV is rejected, will be included as disease controls. PR3-and MPO-ANCA will be performed using assays from Medical & Biological Laboratories Co (Anchor CLEIA) isayama.takuya@mbl.co.jp

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

To evaluate the performance of the recommended strategy for the detection of ANCA based on screening with antigen specific immunoassays on a number of AAV patients and relevant disease controls (i. e., patients for whom ANCA would be requested in the context of small-vessel vasculitis such as patients with infections, drug-induced diseases, connective tissue disease, etc.).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Japan
    • Kagawa
      • Miki, Kagawa, Japan, 761-0793
        • Kagawa univeristy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

primary care clinic

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

.All patients included must be older than 18 years and able to give informed consent.

  • Classification criteria and nomenclature for AAV are from the American College of Rheumatology
  • Serum sampling should be done before initiation of immunosuppressive treatment or no later than 2 weeks after onset of low-medium dose of immunosuppressive treatment (but this should be documented)

Exclusion Criteria:

.Patients younger than 18 years old

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Cases with ANCA vasculitis
Indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) will be performed as well as myeloperoxidase antibody(MPO)- and anti-proteinase 3 (PR3-) ANCA immunoassays and evaluated
Diagnostic test: Indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) , myeloperoxidase antibody(MPO)- and anti-proteinase 3 (PR3-) ANCA immunoassays
Measurement and evaluation of the ANCA testing
Controls with autoimmune diseases other than ANCA vasculitis
Indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) will be performed as well as myeloperoxidase antibody(MPO)- and anti-proteinase 3 (PR3-) ANCA immunoassays and evaluated
Diagnostic test: Indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) , myeloperoxidase antibody(MPO)- and anti-proteinase 3 (PR3-) ANCA immunoassays
Measurement and evaluation of the ANCA testing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anti-proteinase 3 antibody (PR3), anti-myeloperoxidase (MPO) antibody presence in patients with small-vessel vasculitis versus patients without vasculitis
Time Frame: within two weeks of immunosuppressive treatment not after that
Antibodies are detected using chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA).Values above 3.5 u/ml are considered positive
within two weeks of immunosuppressive treatment not after that

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sohag University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mai Mansour, Sohag University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 12, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 19, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 22, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 22, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 19, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ANCA testing evaluation

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings