A Randomized Clinical Study of "Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program" in Swedish Healthcare - ASSIP

August 19, 2025 updated by: Region Skane

This is a randomized study of ASSIP as a treatment for patients who have recently made a suicide attempt. Six psychiatric clinics from four regions in Sweden are included. Together 460 patients will be recruited. Patients will be randomized to ASSIP as a supplement to treatment as usual or to treatment as usual only.

The overall aim of the study is to evaluate whether ASSIP, a short-term clinical intervention, can prevent future suicidal behavior in people who have attempted suicide better than just conventional treatment. The project also investigates whether there are any specific factors that may be related to ASSIP's potential effectiveness and whether ASSIP has health economic benefits.

Only patients who give their written consent will be included in the study. Those who meet the inclusion and no exclusion criteria at screening / visit 1 undergo an assessment according to an interview protocol, self-assessment form, and self-assessment scales. Thereafter, the patient is randomized via an electronic system to either ASSIP plus standard treatment or only standard treatment. All patients, regardless of which treatment they are randomized to, will be followed up for two years with a telephone interview and self-assessment scales month 3, 12 and 24. Data from medical records and registers will also be collected.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Purpose and aims:

The overall purpose of this project is to evaluate ASSIP for the prevention of future suicidal behavior in persons who attempt suicide. The specific goals are a) to examine the effectiveness of Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program (ASSIP) in reducing new suicide attempts in Swedish healthcare, b) to identify factors associated with the effectiveness of ASSIP, c) to construct a cost-effectiveness model of ASSIP.

Background:

According to a consensus position paper from the evidence-based national suicide prevention task force in Europe, health care approaches with high evidence include treatment of depression and ensuring chain of care. These strategies are in line with Swedish guidelines. However, several recent international studies suggest that interventions specifically targeted to prevent suicide attempts may be more successful and that brief psychological interventions are of interest . One promising brief psychotherapeutic intervention to prevent new suicide attempts in suicide attempters is ASSIP . An RCT from Switzerland that included 120 patients showed an 80% risk reduction for new suicide attempt within two years, when ASSIP was added on to treatment as usual (TAU) compared to TAU alone.

Study design:

This is an evaluator-blinded, multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT). The patients will be examined with a structured interview and self-rating scales at baseline (first visit), and structured telephone interviews, self-rating scales and medical record screening at 3 months, 12 months and 24 months follow up. Completed suicides will be detected through the Cause of Death Register. The study will also collect information from the National Board of Health and Welfare (NBHW), National Prescribed Drugs Register (NPDR), Longitudinal integrated database for health insurance and labour market studies (LISA) and the Swedish Social Insurance Agency (Försäkringskassan).

Randomization: After the first visit, the patients will be randomized to ASSIP+ TAU or TAU only, using stratified randomization according to clinical site. The randomization will be performed through REDCAP, a web-based application for electronic data collection in research studies. Expected site differences: To map the variation of TAU with site, age, gender, ICD diagnoses and previous suicide attempts, health care contacts and treatments a TAU check list will be used.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
460

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Sweden
      • Lund, Sweden
        • Recruiting
        • Region Skåne, psykiatri & habilitering, psykiatriforskning skane, Vuxenpsykiatri Lud
        • Contact:
      • Malmö, Sweden
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Region Skåne, psykiatri & habilitering, psykiatriforskning skane,Vuxenpsykiatri Malmoe
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Joanna Månsson, RN

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years.
  • Signed informed consent to participate in the study.
  • Contact with psychiatric health care after a suicide attempt within 3 months before the baseline visit
  • Booked meeting or visit in psychiatry or primary care after visit 1

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Psychotic illness with current delusions, hallucinations or other negative symptoms that may affect the therapy.
  • Known emotionally unstable personality disorder (ICD 10) noted in the medical record
  • Inability to undergo therapy without an interpreter
  • Mental retardation, dementia, or other circumstances that make it difficult to understand the meaning of participating in the study and giving informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: ASSIP plus treatment as usual
ASSIP according to manual. Treatment as usual will be multidisciplinary and combine psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy and other treatments as well as referral to specialist psychiatry or primary care as required.
Behavioral: ASSIP + treatment as usual

ASSIP:

First session: Videotaped narrative interview focusing on the background to the suicidal crisis.

Second session: Video playback. The patient and the therapist watch the recorded interview together, stopping the film regularly to add information. The patient is given a psychoeducational text to read and comment on as homework.

Third session: Compilation of a written case formulation of the individual's vulnerability and triggering events that preceded the suicidal crisis. Individual preventive measures are developed by the patient and the therapist together and written down in a document that the patient keeps and which is attached to the patient's medical record.

Fourth session (optional): Mini-exposure.

Standardized letters: The therapist contacts the patient by letter during two years, every three months the first year and every six months the second year.

Treatment as usual: As described bellow

Other: Treatment as usual and patient safety

All patients follow their usual care, regardless of whether they are treated with ASSIP or not. Usual care is multidisciplinary and combines psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy and other treatments, including referral to specialist psychiatric units or primary care. This depends on the assessments made by the patient's usual care provider. Treatment as usual is monitored by the research team through a standardised medical record review.

In order to increase patient safety, some standardisation of usual care takes place. The research nurse communicates with the referring healthcare provider to ensure that the patient receives a follow-up appointment within the usual care setting after the initial visit and the research team informs the usual care provider and acts when acute suicide risk is detected. In most sites, some information from SIS, CSSR-S and MINI assessments is noted in the patient's medical records.
Active Comparator: Treatment as usual
Treatment as usual will be multidisciplinary and combine psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy and other treatments as well as referral to specialist psychiatry or primary care as required.
Other: Treatment as usual and patient safety

All patients follow their usual care, regardless of whether they are treated with ASSIP or not. Usual care is multidisciplinary and combines psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy and other treatments, including referral to specialist psychiatric units or primary care. This depends on the assessments made by the patient's usual care provider. Treatment as usual is monitored by the research team through a standardised medical record review.

In order to increase patient safety, some standardisation of usual care takes place. The research nurse communicates with the referring healthcare provider to ensure that the patient receives a follow-up appointment within the usual care setting after the initial visit and the research team informs the usual care provider and acts when acute suicide risk is detected. In most sites, some information from SIS, CSSR-S and MINI assessments is noted in the patient's medical records.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of suicide attempts up to 24 months after inclusion
Time Frame: 24 months after inclusion in study
Repeated telephone follow up at 3, 12 and 24 months after inclusion. Medical records data. Register data
24 months after inclusion in study
Number of suicide attempts up to 12 months after inclusion
Time Frame: 12 months after inclusion in study
Repeated telephone follow up at 3, 12 after inclusion. Medical records data. Register data.
12 months after inclusion in study
Number of suicide attempts up to 3 months after inclusion
Time Frame: 3 months after inclusion in study
Telephone follow up at 3 months after inclusion. Medical records data. Register data.
3 months after inclusion in study
Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio( ICER).
Time Frame: 24 months after inclusion
RCT outcomes put into perspective using a health-economic model with a life-time horizon, evidence from literature and complementary register data.
24 months after inclusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of suicidal thoughts/plans within 24 months after inclusion
Time Frame: 24 months after inclusion in study
Repeated self ratings, suicidal thoughts defined as MADRS-S (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) question 9 score above or equal to 4 at 3, 12 and 24 months
24 months after inclusion in study
Number of suicidal thoughts/plans within 12 months after inclusion
Time Frame: 12 months after inclusion in study
Repeated self ratings, suicidal thoughts defined as MADRS-S (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) question 9 score above or equal to 4 at 3 and 12 months
12 months after inclusion in study
Number of suicidal thoughts/plans within 3 months after inclusion
Time Frame: 3 months after inclusion in study
Repeated self ratings, suicidal thoughts defined as MADRS-S (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) question 9 score above or equal to 4 at 3 months
3 months after inclusion in study
Health care contacts and treatments
Time Frame: 24 months after inclusion
Number and type of healthcare contacts according to telephone interviews and medical records
24 months after inclusion
Changes in Quality of life
Time Frame: 3 months
Self reported quality of life reported according to the EuroQol Research Foundation, EQ-5D-5L at 3 months follow up in comparison with first visit.The EQ-5D-5L consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: Each dimension has 5 levels: A higher 1-digit number mean a worse outcome. High scores on the EQ VAS mean a better outcome.
3 months
Changes in Quality of life
Time Frame: 12 months
Self reported quality of life reported according to the EuroQol Research Foundation, EQ-5D-5L at 12 months follow up in comparison with first visit.The EQ-5D-5L consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: Each dimension has 5 levels: A higher 1-digit number mean a worse outcome. High scores on the EQ VAS mean a better outcome.
12 months
Changes in Quality of life
Time Frame: 24 months
Self reported quality of life reported according to the EuroQol Research Foundation, EQ-5D-5L at 24 months follow up in comparison with first visit.The EQ-5D-5L consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: Each dimension has 5 levels: A higher 1-digit number mean a worse outcome. High scores on the EQ VAS mean a better outcome.
24 months
Periods of employment, unemployment, education, military service or pension
Time Frame: 24 months
Periods of employment, unemployment, education, military service or pension registered in the Longitudinal integrated database for health insurance and labour market studies (LISA)
24 months
Amount of income from employment, social insurance, student aid, pension and unemployment benefits.
Time Frame: 24 months
Amount of income from employment, social insurance, student aid, pension and unemployment benefits registered in the Longitudinal integrated database for health insurance and labour market studies (LISA)
24 months
Number of days with sickness and disability benefits
Time Frame: 24 months
Number of days with sickness or disability benefits registered according to the Swedish Social Insurance Agency
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Region Skane

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Åsa Westrin, professor, Region Skane

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 12, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 5, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 9, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 20, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 19, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2020-02360

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Suicide, Attempted

Clinical Trials on ASSIP + treatment as usual

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings