Proximal Tibial Osteotomy Osteoclasis In Infantile Genu-Varum
Proximal Tibial Osteotomy Osteoclasis In Infantile Genu-Varum: Improving the Technique and Managing Potential Complications.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion criteria:
- Infantile genu-varum
- PMTA≤70 not spontaneously corrected
Exclusion criteria:
- Active rickets or other metabolic disease
- Patients in whom the femur or the joint is the main site of the deformity
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: high tibial osteotomy
Under general anesthesia, a one-cm vertical skin incision was done at the medial subcutaneous border of the tibia, one fingerbreadth below the tibial tuberosity.
This was confirmed by intra-operative C-arm images.
Longitudinal periosteal incision was done with minimal dissection.
Incomplete medial transverse osteotomy including both anterior and posterior cortex was performed using drill bit or small thin osteotome.Osteotomy was completed manually by osteoclasis of the lateral cortex to provide postoperative stability by the preserved lateral periosteum.
No fibular osteotomy was needed in the present study.
|
osteotomy osteoclasis of upper tibia
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
proximal medial tibial angle
Time Frame: one year
|
This angle was used for assessment of degree of deformity correction and to follow the presence of under- or over-correction
|
one year
|
|
the posterior proximal tibial angle
Time Frame: one year
|
confirm the absence or presence of any sagittal pro or recurvatum deformities(normal=81±2 degrees)
|
one year
|
|
Self-Administered Patient Satisfaction Scale
Time Frame: one year
|
the investigators asked the parents to rate their satisfaction on a scale from zero to 100 (100 to 75 very satisfied, <75 to 50 somewhat satisfied, <50 to 25 somewhat dissatisfied and <25 dissatisfied).Those who were not satisfied are requested to explain the cause of dissatisfaction.
|
one year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Tanta u
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.