One-Piece Le Fort I Osteotomy Versus Segmental Le Fort I Osteotomy

June 3, 2013 updated by: Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Stability of One-Piece Le Fort I Osteotomy Versus Segmental Le Fort I Osteotomy: A Prospective Study

Le Fort I osteotomy is often used in orthognathic surgery for patients to solve midface retrusion. It is known that post-surgical stability of Le Fort I osteotomy can be influenced by single jaw or bimaxillary procedures, fixation techniques or interpositional grafting. In patients with cleft lip and palate, the postoperative instability of Le Fort I osteotomy can be even worse due to scar tissue resulted from palate surgery. Segmental LeFort I osteotomy is another useful surgical modifications that can be easily done through the alveolar cleft. It is performed to allow the correction of differences in the occlusal planes, correction of transverse discrepancy or to facilitate an optimal occlusion. The most important benefits is that the alveolar cleft in patients who have not had alveolar bone graft surgery or failed to have successful result can be narrow down or even closed by approximation of two separating alveolar segments. However, there are limited previous studies comparing the stability of segmental versus one-piece Le Fort I osteotomy especially in patients with cleft. It is our aim to investigate whether one-piece Le Fort I osteotomy or segmental Le Fort I osteotomy can provide a better stability after surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Measurements Skeletal movement

  1. Skeletal Surgical movement from T2 to T1

    • positional change of landmarks in vertical from constructed Frankfurt plane
    • positional change of landmarks in horizontal plane in relative to constructed coronal plane through Sella point
  2. Post-Surgical skeletal movement (Stability) from T3 to T2

    • positional change of landmarks in vertical from constructed Frankfurt plane
    • positional change of landmarks in horizontal plane in relative to constructed coronal plane through Sella point
  3. Skeletal angular measurement change on mid-sagittal plane from (T2 to T1) and (T3 to T2)
  4. Dental change measured from digital maxillary cast in transverse direction from (T2 to T1) and (T3 to T2)
  5. Facial Height / Facial Proportion changes from (T2 to T1) and (T3 to T2)
  6. Alveolar cleft width changes from (T2 to T1) and (T3 to T2)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei / Taoyuan, Taiwan
        • Recruiting
        • Chang Gung Craniofacial Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Cleft lip/palate patients
  2. Non growing Taiwanese adults, at least 18 years old for men and 16 years old for women
  3. Patients with midface retrusion and malocclusion that will need Le Fort I osteotomy
  4. Rigid fixation with bone plates
  5. Patients who signs the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Association with craniofacial anomalies
  2. Patient without complete 3D imaging records including CBCT scans and digital dental models

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Segmental Le Fort I Osteotomy
For some cases that bone filling over cleft site is not good enough for tooth movement, it is possible that we put them into this group which means by using Segmental Le Fort I Osteotomy to approximate two dental alveolar segments.
comparison the stability of segmental Le Fort I osteotomy with conventional approach of one-piece Le Fort I osteotomy
Other Names:
  • Segmental maxillary osteotomy
  • Maxillary Segmental osteotomy
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: One-piece Le Fort I Osteotomy
For patients having ideal bone graft result over cleft site, traditional One-piece Le Fort I Osteotomy will be performed.
conventional approach
Other Names:
  • Le Fort I Osteotomy
  • Le Fort 1 Osteotomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
stability and relapse rate of surgical movement
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery & 1-2 years till the completion of the treatment
to compare the stability and relapse rate in vertical, horizontal and transverse among two kinds of different surgical techniuques
6 months after surgery & 1-2 years till the completion of the treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Presence of pathological change of cleft-adjacent teeth
Time Frame: immediate after surgery, 6 months after surgery & 2 years till the completion of the treatment
record any periodontal breakdown or periapical radiolucency of cleft-adjacent teeth
immediate after surgery, 6 months after surgery & 2 years till the completion of the treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Yu Fang Liao, Ph.D., Chang Gung Craniofacial Center , Chang Gung Memorial Hospial , Taoyuan , Taiwa

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

March 1, 2016

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 23, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 7, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 7, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2013

Last Verified

March 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cleft Lip and Palate

Clinical Trials on Segmental Le Fort I osteotomy

Subscribe