Precisely Estimation of the Prognostic Value of Lymph Node in ESCC

February 19, 2021 updated by: Shanghai Cancer Hospital, China

Prognostic Value of Examined and Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Chinese Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Received Lymphadenectomy

Data were collected on a large multi-institution dataset consisting of ESCC patients who underwent surgery between January 2003 and December 2013 at ten institutions in the People's Republic of China. The datasets were approved for research by the institutional review board of each participating center. Prior to surgery, all patients received computerised tomography (CT) of the chest and abdomen and EUS as part of their routine staging workup. Patients received whole body FDG-PET to eliminate the possibility of distant metastases if the attending physician considered it was necessary. All patients in the dataset received a surgical R0 resection; patients who received an R1 or R2 resection were excluded. Notably, there is nothing approaching a consensus on the extent of lymph node dissection for ESCC patients. Patients who received neoadjuvant therapy were excluded due to the influence of neoadjuvant therapy on lymph node status and pathologic T stage. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), which was defined as the time between surgical resection and death from any cause, and cancer-specific survival (CSS), defined as the time from surgical resection to death caused by ESCC. After receiving esophagectomy, patients were followed up by clinical examination every three months for the first year, every three to six months for the second year, and every six to twelve months from then on.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
3700

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients elder than 18 years old received computerised tomography (CT) of the chest and abdomen and EUS as part of their routine staging workup. Patients received whole body FDG-PET to eliminate the possibility of distant metastases if the attending physician considered it was necessary. Patients underwent R0 resection and lymphadenectomy.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Minimum age: 18 years
  2. Patients underwent R0 resection and lymphadenectomy.
  3. ECOG PS less than or equal 2
  4. Adequate bone marrow function: Leukocytes > 3,5 x 10^9/L Absolute neutrophil count > 1,5 x 10^9/L Platelet count > 100 x 10^9/L Hemoglobin > 10 g/dl
  5. Adequate hepatic function: Total bilirubin < 2,0 mg/dl ALAT, ASAT, alkaline phosphatase, gamma-GT < 3 x ULN 7. Serum creatinine < 1,5 mg/dl, creatinine-clearance > 50 ml/min
  6. Written informed consent before randomization

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. R1 or R2 resection
  2. Patients underwent neoadjuvant therapy
  3. Fertile patients without adequate contraception during therapy
  4. Psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule
  5. History of severe somatic or psychological diseases: - instable cardiac disease not well controlled with medication, myocardial infarction within the last 6 months:* Central nervous system disorders or psychiatric disability including dementia or epileptic disease; * active uncontrolled intercurrent infections or sepsis
  6. Previous or concurrent malignancies, with the exception of adequately treated basal cell carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the cervix. The inclusion of patients with other adequately treated tumors within the last 5 years has to be discussed with the principal investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
OS
Time Frame: Five years
Overall survival
Five years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Shanghai Cancer Hospital, China

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 30, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 18, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 19, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 21, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 23, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 19, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ASJSTO1901

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings