Functioning of Elder Muscle; Understanding Recovery (FEMUR)

March 26, 2026 updated by: University of Nottingham

Muscle Phenotyping in Frail Older Patients Having Hip Surgery Following Fracture

As people get older, the amount of skeletal muscle in the body can decrease. When the amount of this muscle in the body gets very low, there is an increased risk of falling, and not only is recovery to any injury slower, but more complications can be experienced following surgery, and patients may end up being more dependent on the help of others for meeting daily activities. However, it is not clear whether it is simply the amount of muscle that is in the body that is important for health, or whether it is the ability of muscle to function properly which is important.

This research study is looking at the way muscles of frail older people function; not just how strong they are, but the amount of fats and protein that there are in muscle cells, and how the genes in the muscles are being expressed (genes being a collection of chemical information that carry the instructions for making the proteins a cell will need to function).

We will also investigate whether recovery from hip fracture is impacted by the amount of muscle that there is in the body, and/or the functioning of this muscle.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Sarcopenia is the age-associated loss of skeletal muscle mass, muscle quality and strength, and is a contributive factor to frailty in older individuals. Meta-analyses suggest that individuals with sarcopenia appear to be at greater risk of hospitalisation (all cause), falls and fracture, with hip fracture following a fall being both a serious consequence of sarcopenia, as well as a risk factor for frailty syndrome. The short and longer term outcomes for patients who have a hip fracture following a fall are poor (post-operative complications, increased length of hospital stay, and increased mortality risk, institutionalisation and dependency, respectively), and these are understood to be largely due to the underlying vulnerability (frailty) of the people who sustain hip fractures, with poor recovery being compounded by the reduced muscle strength and low muscle mass common in those who are frail.

As a consequence of research on the physiology of ageing muscles and sarcopenia, increasingly there is the possibility that novel agents (such as anabolic agents) could help to alleviate the frailty state in these patients and hence improve shorter and longer term outcomes. However, before novel interventions can be applied to patients with frailty and sarcopenia, such as those sustaining a hip fracture following a fall, an understanding of how the muscles of these patients are functioning at the cellular level, both in the injured and uninjured state is needed; which metabolic pathways are active and which are inactive, those which are enhanced and those which are impaired, so that treatments that are appropriate for the specific metabolic state of these patients can be selected. In recent years there have been advances in the understanding of the cellular physiology of the muscles of older people. However, few of the research studies carried out to date have analysed muscle collected from individuals who are as frail as the patients who present with hip fractures, or probed the metabolic changes which occur in the muscle following injury in this cohort. Findings from cross-sectional investigations on the healthy older person and prospective studies which try and mimic the muscle wasting seen in sarcopenia (using immobilisation or bed rest protocols) could prove useful in this endeavour. However, it is possible that results from these studies may not be generalizable to those who are frail (who may have other clinical problems and take multiple medications) and it is important that deep phenotyping of muscle from these patients is undertaken to address this knowledge gap.

Across the whole study, including a cohort subset, a range of people with frailty, including those with cognitive impairment will be studied. Those with dementia or severe cognitive impairment tend to be those who are most frail and represent a high proportion of patients admitted with a hip fracture. If such patients are excluded, there is a risk of only observing muscle metabolic and histological changes seen in milder levels of frailty, which may not provide a comprehensive picture of sarcopenia. This is a frequent criticism and limitation of previous studies carried out in this field.

Participants will be older individuals admitted to Nottingham University Hospital (UK) with a fractured hip sustained following a fall. In all participants, a muscle sample will be taken from their injured leg during the surgical repair to their hip, with the option for a muscle biopsy to be taken, whilst in theatre, from their uninjured leg using the Bergstrom technique. These samples will be analysed for intramyocellular lipid content and messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) expression of 384 gene targets spanning a number of cellular functions. In the week following surgery, measurements of thigh muscle thickness (Ultrasound imaging) and hand grip strength will be made, and an optional assessment of whole body muscle mass using the D3-creatine method will be offered. After discharge from hospital, patient-related outcomes measures will be obtained from medical notes and Three months after surgery, a set of questionnaires will be sent to the participant or their carer to complete. These will assess current mobility, dependency and wellbeing.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Nottingham, United Kingdom, NG72UH
        • Queens Medical Centre; Department of Orthopaedics

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Individuals >65 years who have been admitted to Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK for surgical repair of a hip fracture sustained following a low impact fall.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical Frailty Score (assessed as part of standard care) ≥ 4
  • Fractured hip, sustained following a fall, that requires surgery
  • Good understanding of spoken and written English language
  • Able to give informed consent, or availability of a legally acceptable surrogate to provide consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those who fell and sustained their hip fracture greater than 12 hours prior to hospitalisation.
  • Those who have fallen and sustained a hip fracture whilst an in-patient in hospital
  • Those who sustained the hip fracture as a result of high impact trauma (e.g. road traffic accident)
  • Surgery carried out later than 96 hrs after fall
  • Chronic neurological, inflammatory or musculoskeletal disorders which result in muscle wasting, e.g. Multiple sclerosis, muscular dystrophy, rheumatoid arthritis
  • Any co-morbidity which precludes hip surgery
  • Those with a compromised swallowing reflex which would prevent the participant from taking fluids orally, will be excluded.
  • Those taking diabetes medication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Skeletal Muscle messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) expression (injured leg)
Time Frame: On recruitment
mRNA expression of 384 gene targets spanning a number of cellular functions, in a vastus lateralis muscle biopsy taken from the injured leg
On recruitment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Skeletal Muscle mRNA expression (un-injured leg)
Time Frame: On recruitment
mRNA expression of 384 gene targets spanning a number of cellular functions, in a vastus lateralis muscle biopsy taken from the uninjured leg
On recruitment
Intramyocellular lipid density (injured leg)
Time Frame: On recruitment
Intra-myocellular lipid density in a vastus lateralis muscle biopsy taken from the injured leg
On recruitment
Intramyocellular lipid density (uninjured leg)
Time Frame: On recruitment
Intra-myocellular lipid density in a vastus lateralis muscle biopsy taken from the uninjured leg
On recruitment
Body weight
Time Frame: on recruitment
body mass (kg)
on recruitment
Grip Strength
Time Frame: up to 3 days post surgery
Hand grip strength measured on dominant arm - highest of 3 attempts
up to 3 days post surgery
Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI) questionnaire
Time Frame: on recruitment
Groningen Frailty Indicator Score: minimum value (no frailty) indicated by a score of 0, increasing to a maximum value of 15 (completely disabled). Frailty is indicated by a score ≥4, with lower scores indicating better outcomes
on recruitment
Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI) questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 week post operative
Groningen Frailty Indicator Score: minimum value (no frailty) indicated by a score of 0, increasing to a maximum value of 15 (completely disabled). Frailty is indicated by a score ≥4, with lower scores indicating better outcomes
1 week post operative
Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI) questionnaire
Time Frame: 90 days post operative
Groningen Frailty Indicator Score: minimum value (no frailty) indicated by a score of 0, increasing to a maximum value of 15 (completely disabled). Frailty is indicated by a score ≥4, with lower scores indicating better outcomes
90 days post operative
Barthel Index for Activities of Daily Living (BADL) questionnaire
Time Frame: on recruitment
Barthel Index for Activities of Daily Living score: minimum value (totally independent) indicated by a score of 0, increasing to a maximum value of 60 (totally dependent). Lower scores indicate better outcomes
on recruitment
Barthel Index for Activities of Daily Living (BADL) questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 week post operative
Barthel Index for Activities of Daily Living score: minimum value (totally independent) indicated by a score of 0, increasing to a maximum value of 60 (totally dependent). Lower scores indicate better outcomes
1 week post operative
Barthel Index for Activities of Daily Living (BADL) questionnaire
Time Frame: 90 days post operative
Barthel Index for Activities of Daily Living score: minimum value (totally independent) indicated by a score of 0, increasing to a maximum value of 60 (totally dependent). Lower scores indicate better outcomes
90 days post operative
Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) Questionnaire
Time Frame: on recruitment
Rivermead Mobility Index score: minimum value (immobile) indicated by a score of 0, increasing to a maximum value of 15. Higher scores indicate better mobility and better outcomes
on recruitment
Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 week post operative
Rivermead Mobility Index score: minimum value (immobile) indicated by a score of 0, increasing to a maximum value of 15. Higher scores indicate better mobility and better outcomes
1 week post operative
Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) Questionnaire
Time Frame: 90 days post operative
Rivermead Mobility Index score: minimum value (immobile) indicated by a score of 0, increasing to a maximum value of 15. Higher scores indicate better mobility and better outcomes
90 days post operative
EuroQoL health-related quality of life questionnaire (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: 1 week post operative
EuroQoL health-related quality of life questionnaire score: across each of 5 domains, a minimum value of 1 indicates no problems, increasing to a maximum value of 5 indicating an inability to do a task, or an extreme experience of a sensation. Lower scores indicate better outcomes
1 week post operative
EuroQoL health-related quality of life questionnaire (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: 90 days post operative
EuroQoL health-related quality of life questionnaire score: across each of 5 domains, a minimum value of 1 indicates no problems, increasing to a maximum value of 5 indicating an inability to do a task, or an extreme experience of a sensation. Lower scores indicate better outcomes
90 days post operative
Vastus lateralis muscle thickness - injured leg
Time Frame: 3 days post operative
Vastus lateralis muscle thickness measured at the midpoint using ultrasonography
3 days post operative
Vastus lateralis muscle thickness - uninjured leg
Time Frame: 3 days post operative
Vastus lateralis muscle thickness measured at the midpoint using ultrasonography
3 days post operative
Whole body muscle mass
Time Frame: 3 days post operative
whole body muscle mass assessed using the D3-Creatine method
3 days post operative
Clinical outcomes; surgical complications
Time Frame: from date of surgery to date of discharge from hospital; up to 90-days after hip surgery
occurrence of surgical complications audited from patient notes prior to discharge
from date of surgery to date of discharge from hospital; up to 90-days after hip surgery
Clinical outcomes; adverse events during period of hospitalisation
Time Frame: from date of recruitment to date of discharge from hospital; up to 90-days post operative.
occurrence of adverse events collected throughout period of hospitalisation
from date of recruitment to date of discharge from hospital; up to 90-days post operative.
Clinical outcomes; length of stay
Time Frame: at discharge from hospital; up to 90 days post hip surgery
Length of hospitalisation period audited from patient notes prior to discharge
at discharge from hospital; up to 90 days post hip surgery
Clinical outcomes; discharge location
Time Frame: at discharge from hospital; up to 90 days post hip surgery
discharge location audited from patient notes prior to discharge
at discharge from hospital; up to 90 days post hip surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ben Ollivere, MBBS, University of Nottingham

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 4, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 8, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20/LO/0841

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

gene expression data will be made available in a open access data depository after publication.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Frailty Syndrome

Search Similar Trials