The NADage Study: Nicotinamide Riboside Replenishment Therapy Against Functional Decline in Aging (NADage)

January 4, 2024 updated by: Haukeland University Hospital

The NADage Study: A Randomized Double-blind Trial of NAD Replenishment Therapy on Aging

This clinical study, designed as a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, aims to investigate the potential of nicotinamide riboside (NR) to decelerate functional decline in the elderly frail population. In animal studies, NR, which is converted to nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD), has shown potential as a neuroprotective agent, with indications of protection against amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Alzheimer's dementia, and Parkinson's disease. Furthermore, aging is commonly associated with decreased tissue NAD levels, a phenomenon linked to premature aging and a spectrum of age-related disorders, including cardiovascular diseases and cancers. Existing preclinical and clinical research highlights the promise of NAD replenishment through enhanced DNA repair, sirtuin activity, and improved mitochondrial function. The research center has conducted two phase II clinical trials on NR for Parkinson's disease (NAD-PARK and NR-SAFE), administering up to 3000 mg of NR daily. These trials have shown promising results, indicating NR's potential as a treatment that may alter the course of the disease and possibly as neuroprotective treatment in Parkinson's disease.

The NAD age trial primarily aims to determine:

  • The efficacy of NAD therapy in improving clinical symptoms of frailty, evaluated through standardized physical and cognitive function tests.
  • The safety of administering 2000 mg NR daily in an elderly frail population.

The study will include 100 individuals, classified as frail based on the Fried Frailty Phenotype. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either 2000 mg of NR daily or a placebo. Over a 52-week period, participants will undergo:

  • Clinical evaluations, including actigraphy and questionnaires.
  • Cognitive assessments.
  • Bio sampling.
  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
  • Positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scanning.

The outcomes of this study could potentially demonstrate that NR effectively reduces signs of frailty, offering considerable advantages to the individuals affected, their families, and society as a whole.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study aims to administer 2000 mg of nicotinamide riboside (NR) daily to explore its effects on brain and body metabolism in an elderly, frail population. The research design is a single-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled approach. Participants will be evenly randomized into two groups in a 1:1 ratio: one to receive a placebo and the other to receive 2000 mg of NR daily. The intervention will last for 52 weeks, during which primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed across and within both groups.

The primary objective is to evaluate the impact of NR on gait speed by comparing the treatment group with the placebo group. Secondary objectives include assessing the safety and tolerability of NR, as well as its clinical effects on physical and cognitive functions, using standardized tests. Furthermore, exploratory objectives will be pursued using various methods such as questionnaires, biosampling, actigraphy, and brain scans. These scans will include 31P-MR-spectrometry to analyze NAD levels in the brain and FDG-PET to assess metabolic network activity. The study will include 100 frail individuals who have provided informed consent. Biological samples to be collected include blood/serum, blood cells, urine, and fecal samples.

Given the previously demonstrated potential of NR in reducing symptoms of Parkinson's disease, this study seeks to expand knowledge of its effects on an elderly, frail population without neurodegenerative disorders. If NR is found to be effective in improving measures of frailty, it could significantly impact societal health and economy, especially considering the extensive socio-economic challenges associated with frailty.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Vestland
      • Bergen, Vestland, Norway, 5021
        • Haukeland University Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Charalampos Tzoulis, PhD
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Katarina Lundervold, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant must understand the nature of the study and be able to provide written, informed consent.
  • Male or female aged ≥ 75 years at baseline.
  • Fried Frailty Phenotype score ≥ 3 to identify frail individuals.
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) at screening adjusted to age, gender, and educational level, with a threshold set at the 10th percentile (z-score ≤ -1.28).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide informed consent.
  • Does not reside in a facility or institution.
  • Advanced disability, end-stage disease, presence of severe chronic illness and/or life expectancy of less than a year.
  • Inability to complete a 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and/or contraindications to the procedure (history of unstable angina or myocardial infarction within 30 days prior to the test).
  • Diagnosis of active malignancy in the last 2 years at baseline (exceptions include non-metastatic skin conditions and non-metastatic and/or treated prostate cancer with stable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in six months prior to baseline). Specific considerations may apply depending on the type of cancer.
  • Significant neurological or psychiatric disorders, including but not limited to psychotic disorders, severe bipolar or unipolar depression, multiple sclerosis, uncontrolled seizure conditions, and neurodegenerative disorder.
  • A history of cerebrovascular events, excluding transient ischemic attack (TIA) that occurs more than 3 months prior to baseline.
  • Hospitalization or major surgery within 3 months prior to baseline.
  • Significant changes in medications or treatment plans made less than one month prior to baseline, judged by the site investigator to interfere with the subject's participation in the study.
  • Consumption of NAD precursor supplements (e.g., Nicotinamide riboside, nicotinamide mononucleotide or Vitamin B3), or related supplements within 6 months prior to baseline.
  • Elective surgeries scheduled during the study duration.
  • Concurrent participation in other clinical trials with interventions that could affect frailty measures.
  • Any medical history, at the discretion of the investigator, might hinder compliance with study procedures or increase risk to the participant.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo group
Placebo, no active ingredients. Administered in tablet form twice daily for the duration of the trial (1 year).
Placebo tablet identical in taste, shape and appearance to NR tablets.
Experimental: NR group
Nicotinamide Riboside (NR) administered in doses of 1000 mg twice daily for the duration of the trial (1 year).
A total of 2000 mg NR is administered daily for 1 year.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The between-group (NR vs. Placebo) difference in the change in gait speed.
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Gait speed is assessed by the 6-minute walk test (6MWT).
52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (safety and tolerability).
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Monitor the frequency and severity of adverse events (AE).
52 weeks
Change in physical performance assessed by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB).
Time Frame: 52 weeks
SPPB is performed as an objective measurements on balance, lower extremity strength, and functional capacity through walking and sit to stand test.
52 weeks
Change in physical performance assessed by hand grip strength.
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Grip strength is measured on the dominant hand with a hydraulic hand-held dynamometer.
52 weeks
Change in cognitive function assessed using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) test battery.
Time Frame: 52 weeks
The RBANS test battery is composed of tests on immediate memory, visuospatial/constructional abilities, language, attention, and delayed memory. Score range: 40-160. A higher score indicates a better performance.
52 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in daily step count.
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Measured in number of steps using Axivity wearable sensors. Counts the total number of steps taken by an individual over a specified period.
52 weeks
Change in overall activity level.
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Measured in activity counts using Axivity's accelerometer data. Quantifies the total amount of physical activity based on intensity and duration.
52 weeks
Change in speed of movements.
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Measured in per second (m/s) using Axivity's accelerometer and gyroscope data. Calculates the average or peak speed of movements during different activities.
52 weeks
Change in acceleration of movements.
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Measured in meters per second squared (m/s2) using Axivity's accelerometer data. Measures the rate of change of speed, indicating how quickly an individual is increasing or decreasing speed during activities. Measured in meters per second squared (m/s^2) using Axivity's accelerometer data.
52 weeks
Change in angular velocity of movements.
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Measured in radians per second (rad/s) using Axivity's gyroscope data. Measures the rate of rotation around an axis, assessing movement dynamics.
52 weeks
Change in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) score.
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Assessed by the Barthel Index Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale. Score range: 0 - 20. A higher score indicate better functional status.
52 weeks
Change in Independent living skills (IADL) score.
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Assessed by the Nottingham Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scale. Score range: 0-66. A higher score indicate better functional status.
52 weeks
Change in mobility assessed by the Life Space Questionnaire (LSQ).
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Score range: 0-18. A higher score indicates more limited mobility.
52 weeks
Change in mood assessed by the Montgomery Aasberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS).
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Score range: 0-54. Higher score indicates a greater severity of depressive symptoms.
52 weeks
Change in self-reported mood assessed by the Geriatric depression scale (GDS).
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Score range: 0-30. A higher score indicates more severe depressive symptoms.
52 weeks
Change in self-assessment of perceived health assessed by the Short form 36 (RAND-36).
Time Frame: 52 weeks
The RAND-36 assessment does not provide a single summary score; rather, it offers scores for each of eight domains (physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue, pain, and general health perceptions), allowing for a comprehensive assessment of a person's health-related quality of life.
52 weeks
Change in sleep assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) global score.
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Seven component scores are derived, each scored 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (severe difficulty). The component scores are summed to produce a global score (range 0 to 21). Higher scores indicates worse sleep quality.
52 weeks
Change in smell identification capacity assessed using the Brief Smell Identification Test (BSIT).
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Score range: 0-12. A higher score indicates better smell identification.
52 weeks
Change in nutritional status assessed using the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) form.
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Score range: 0-30. A higher score indicates better nutritional status.
52 weeks
Change in sarcopenia assessment.
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Assessed using anthropometric measures (weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2).
52 weeks
Change in health-related quality of life assessed by a standardized measure of quality of life (the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire).
Time Frame: 52 weeks
The EQ-5D-5L does not provide a single summary score; rather, it offers three levels, where level 1 indicates higher quality of life.
52 weeks
Change in cognitive function using the Grooved Pegboard test.
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Test on motor function, attention, and executive functioning.
52 weeks
Change in cumulative illness / comorbidity examined using the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatric (CIRS-G).
Time Frame: 52 weeks
CIRS-G does not provide a single summary score; rather, it offers four levels of severity where level 4 is the highest severity of comorbidity.
52 weeks
Change in social support assessed using the Multidimensional scale of perceived social support (MSPSS).
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Score range: 12-84. Higher scores indicates higher perceived support.
52 weeks
The between-visit difference in cerebral NAD levels.
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Measured by 31P-Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P-MRS)
52 weeks
The between-visit difference in expression of the Nicotinamide Riboside Related Pattern (NRRP).
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Measured by fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET).
52 weeks
The between-visit difference in levels of NAD-metabolites in whole blood.
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS).
52 weeks
Change in blood-based biomarkers.
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Blood routine biochemistry encompassing cardiovascular-, metabolic-, renal- and hepatic markers, immune- and inflammatory profiles.
52 weeks
Change in gene and protein expression levels related to lysosomal and proteasomal function.
Time Frame: 52 weeks
The between-visit change in gene and protein expression levels related to lysosomal and proteasomal function in whole blood, measured by RNA sequencing (RNAseq) and proteomics (LC-MS), respectively.
52 weeks
Change in genomic distribution of DNA methylation.
Time Frame: 52 weeks
The between-visit difference in genomic distribution of DNA methylation, measured by the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC Kit.
52 weeks
Change in levels of DNA methylation.
Time Frame: 52 weeks
The between-visit difference in levels of DNA methylation, measured by the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC Kit.
52 weeks
Change in gut microbiome composition.
Time Frame: 52 weeks
The between-visit difference in gut microbiome composition, assessed by metagenomics in fecal samples.
52 weeks
Change in fecal metabolomics.
Time Frame: 52 weeks
The between-visit difference in fecal metabolomics, including fatty acid profiling.
52 weeks
Change in levels of inflammatory cytokines in serum.
Time Frame: 52 weeks
The between-visit difference in levels of inflammatory cytokines in serum measured using the ELISA method.
52 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Charalampos Tzoulis, PhD, Haukeland University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

January 17, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 17, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Frail Elderly Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe