Clinical Efficacy and Change of Life Quality Through Using the Comprehensive Behavioral Intervention Treatment for Tics

February 18, 2021 updated by: Children's Hospital of Fudan University

Study on the Clinical Efficacy and Change of Life Quality Through Using the Comprehensive Behavioral Intervention Treatment for Tics (CBIT)

Study on the clinical efficacy and change of life quality through using the Comprehensive Behavioral Intervention Treatment for Tics (CBIT)

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study tried to explore the clinical effect of comprehensive behavioral intervention therapy (CBIT) on tic symptoms and the effect of improving the quality of life in children with tic disorders;explore the optimal treatment plan for tic disorder by comparing the clinical efficacy of CBIT therapy, drug therapy, and psychosocial education; explore the feasibility of using quality of life as an evaluation index for functional recovery after tic disorder treatment;

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

9 years to 16 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Meets the diagnostic criteria for chronic tic disorder or Tourette syndrome (TS) according to the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V), and has been diagnosed by two pediatric psychiatrists who are associate chief physicians or more;
  • The age ranged from 9 to 16 years old;
  • The total score of tic symptoms in the Yale global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) is 13-30;
  • Childrens Webster's Intelligence Scale ≥ 85
  • Co-morbid ADHD, but the drug treatment dose for ADHD is stable (the drug has been stabilized for more than 6 weeks), or no drug has been taken at the beginning and during the stud

Exclusion Criteria:

  • There are brain organic diseases, metabolic diseases, psychiatric disorders, drug-induced involuntary movement and other extrapyramidal lesions;
  • Habit reversal training and other behavioral treatments for more than 4 weeks;
  • unwilling participants or disobedient subgroups in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: CBIT Group
Patients in this group would only receive the CBIT treatment.
Behavioral: comprehensive behavioral intervention therapy (CBIT)

Comprehensive behavioral intervention for tics is an extension of habit reversal training. It includes an expanded set of strategies, such as psycho-education about tic disorders, tic awareness training, competing response training, relaxation training, and functional analysis.

According to the CBIT treatment manual (translated by sun Jinhua and Xu Wen, the author were Douglas W. woods et al., Oxford University Press, New York). The treatments consisted of 8 sessions for 10 weeks The first two phases were 1.5 hours, the last six stages were 1 hour.The treatment process was regularly supervised by a treatment supervisor.
EXPERIMENTAL: Drug therapy Group
Patients in this group would only receive the drug therapy.
Drug: Aripiprazole 5Mg Oral Tablet
Considering the patients with chronic tic disorder (chronic motor or vocal tic disorder or Tourette's disorder), aripiprazole was selected as a single drug with constant dose during the treatment. In case of extrapyramidal side effects, benhexol was given to reduce the extrapyramidal side effects, and the dosage and duration of medication were recorded

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reduction rate of Tic symptom severity before and after intervention
Time Frame: Baseline, the tenth week of treatment

Tic symptom severity is estimated by Yale Global Tic Severity Scale Total Tic score. The YGTSS is a clinician-rated scale used to assess tic severity over the prior week. It includes a checklist of motor and vocal tics followed by an assessment of the number, frequency, intensity, complexity, and inference of motor tics and phonic tics-scored separately. Each of these dimensions is scored on a 0 to 5 scale. The YGTSS provides three tic severity scores: Total Motor (0 to 25); Total Phonic (0 to 25) and the combined Total Tic Severity Score (0 to 50), as well as a separate Impairment dimension scored from0 to 50. The Total Tic Score (YGTSS-TTS) was used in these analyses.Lower scores indicate improvement and higher scores indicate worsening.

Reduction rate = (YGTSS total score before intervention - YGTSS total score after intervention) / YGTSS total score before treatment × 100%
Baseline, the tenth week of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
overall treatment response
Time Frame: The fifth week and the tenth week of treatment and three month after treatment end
The overall treatment response is measured by CG-I. This is a repeated measurement variable.The CGI-I was used to measure overall treatment response. The scores range from 1 (very much improved) to 4 (no change) to 7 (very much worse). We defined positive response as a score of 1 or 2 (much improved or very much improved).
The fifth week and the tenth week of treatment and three month after treatment end
life quality
Time Frame: The fifth week and the tenth week of treatment and three month after treatment end

Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) and Child Tourette's Syndrome Impairment Scale(CTIM) were used to assessed health-related QoL.This is a repeated measurement variable.

PedsQL was a widely used 15-item measure assessed health-related QoL. Parents were asked to rate how often a particular item had been a problem during the past month using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from ''never a problem'' to ''almost always a problem." Total scores were linearly transformed to a scale of 0 to 100. Higher scores indicated better QoL. Four subscales measured physical, emotional, social, and school functioning.

The CTIM-P is a 37-item parent-rated instrument that includes school, home, and social activities that may be impaired by their child's tics or a co-morbid problem (e.g., obsessive-compulsive symptoms, depressed mood, anxiety, oppositional/disruptive behavior, hyperactivity, inattentiveness).
The fifth week and the tenth week of treatment and three month after treatment end

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Children's Hospital of Fudan University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 21, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 18, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 21, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 18, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Sunjinhua

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tic Disorders

Clinical Trials on comprehensive behavioral intervention therapy (CBIT)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings