Endoscopic Characterisation of Inflammation in EoE (ECI-EoE)

February 21, 2021 updated by: University of Zurich

Endoscopic Characterisation of Inflammatory Activity in EoE: Comparison of Two Gastroscopes With High Magnification to the Goldstandard Histology

In this study, we plan to investigate the accuracy of the EG-760Z endoscope (135x zoom) compared with standard imaging with histology as gold standard in detecting and grading inflammatory activity in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic-inflammatory disease of the esophagus. If left untreated, eosinophilic inflammation induces fibrosis, angiogenesis and stricture formation, finally resulting in a so called remodelling with structural and functional damage of the organ. In addition, patients with untreated EoE are permanently at risk of experiencing food impactions. It is therefore widely accepted that active EoE should be recognized and treated as such. Any treatment applied in EoE should ideally achieve two therapeutic goals: first, resolution of symptoms, and, second, control of inflammation.

However, in some cases of EoE, there is a dissociation between symptoms and histological response.

Furthermore, characteristic endoscopic findings may occur together but are not all seen in every EoE patient. As an example, in 7% to 10% of cases the esophagus may appear normal. Lastly, inflammatory infiltration of the esophageal wall may be discontinuous. In order to define endoscopic activity of EoE in a standardized fashion, the endoscopic reference score (EREFS) is usually applied.

Several endoscopic findings, including linear furrows, concentric rings, white exudates, decreased vasculature in the esophageal mucosa, esophageal strictures, and the esophagus of narrow caliber have been reported to be the characteristic findings of EoE, although neither of these is specific. According to a meta-analysis from 2012, consisting primarily of retrospective studies involving adult cohorts, the overall pooled prevalence of endoscopic findings in patients with EoE was 44% rings, 21% strictures, 9% narrow caliber esophagus, 48% linear furrows, 27% white exudates, and 41% decreased vascularity, with a wide variation in the prevalence of those endoscopic findings between each report.

Lastly, inflammatory infiltration of the esophageal wall may be discontinuous. Taken together, endoscopic recognition of EoE remains a major clinical challenge and diagnosis still relies on histological sampling which in turn renders the diagnosis prone to sampling errors.

In addition to that, it is well known that optimal control of inflammatory activity is crucial in order to prevent progression of fibrosis. Therefore, monitoring inflammatory activity (determined by the EoE histologic scoring system; EoE-HSS) is part of clinical routine in patients with EoE. As outlined above, endoscopic assessment, however, does not reliably reflect the underlying process of the disease during the index endoscopy and cannot be regarded as reliable follow-up test.

The investigators hypothesize that novel endoscopic technologies overcome the shortcomings of the standard endoscopic imaging. It is therefore planned to compare images of the esophageal mucosa using the EG-760Z endoscope by Fujifilm (Fujifilm Europe, Düsseldorf, Germany) to standard imaging with high magnification imaging. This novel endoscope acquires images with a magnification by a factor of 135. As gold standard, histological assessment of the inflammatory activity will be used.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Eligible are patients with histology-proven EoE in whom a follow-up endoscopy is indicated. Indications for follow-up endoscopy are i) determination of the response to PPI-Trial or ii) inadequate symptomatic relief despite established therapy.

Type of treatment, or response to, have no implications on eligibility.

Participants fulfilling all of the following inclusion criteria are eligible for the study:

  • Patient is capable of giving informed consent
  • Informed Consent as documented by signature (Appendix Informed Consent Form)
  • Have histology proven EoE and are due to undergo follow-up gastroscopy or are due to undergo gastroscopy to investigate dyspepsia (control group)
  • Male and Female patients 18 years to 80 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to outpatient gastroscopy
  • Contraindication for Non-anesthesia Provider Procedural Sedation and Analgesia: ASA class III or higher, morbid obesity (BMI > 40 kg/m^2), severe OSAS
  • Contraindications to tissue sampling: oral anticoagulation in combination with antiaggregant such as aspirin or clopidogrel,
  • Patients without subcutaneous veins that allow for insertion of peripheral venous catheters
  • Women who are pregnant or breast feeding
  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc.
  • Participation in another study with investigational drug/device within the 30 days preceding and during the present study
  • Previous enrolment into the current study
  • Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Standard Imaging
In 20 randomly assigned patients, the area of endoscopically highest activity will be biopsied as determined by standard imaging. A total of 10 biopsies will be taken in 4 sets: 1 = one single biopsy at best guess of highest activity; 2 = one single biopsy at second best guess of highest activitiy, 3 = 4 biopsies in proximal esophagus with presumed activity, 4 = 4 biopsies in distal esophagus with presumed activity. Overall qualitative (eosinophilic inflammation present vs. absent) and semi-quantitative (estimation of the number of eosinophilic neutrophils according to the following categories 1: 0, 2: 1-6, 3. 7-14, 4. 15-50, 5. :50-100, 6. > 100, together with an estimation of an absolute number of eosinophilic neutrophils) inflammatory activity will be rated for the presumed localization of maximal histologic activity and subsequently for all other 10 biopsies using this imaging modality by endoscopist.
Device: EG-760Z endoscope by Fujifilm

Within a single endoscopic procedure under propofol sedation, images of the esophageal wall will be acquired and biopsies will be taken. All patients will be examined using the EG-760Z endoscope by Fujifilm.

In all patients as part of the clinical routine 4 biopsies of the proximal and 4 biopsies of the distal esophagus will be taken.
Experimental: High Magnification Imaging
In 20 randomly assigned patients, the area of endoscopically highest activity will be biopsied as determined by high magnification imaging. A total of 10 biopsies will be taken in 4 sets: 1 = one single biopsy at best guess of highest activity; 2 = one single biopsy at second best guess of highest activitiy, 3 = 4 biopsies in proximal esophagus with presumed activity, 4 = 4 biopsies in distal esophagus with presumed activity. Overall qualitative (eosinophilic inflammation present vs. absent) and semi-quantitative (see above) inflammatory activity will be rated for the presumed localization of maximal histologic activity and subsequently all other 10 biopsies using this imaging modality by endoscopist.
Device: EG-760Z endoscope by Fujifilm

Within a single endoscopic procedure under propofol sedation, images of the esophageal wall will be acquired and biopsies will be taken. All patients will be examined using the EG-760Z endoscope by Fujifilm.

In all patients as part of the clinical routine 4 biopsies of the proximal and 4 biopsies of the distal esophagus will be taken.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
High magnification leeds to more accurate histologic sampling
Time Frame: 6 months

High magnification by a factor of 135, using the EG-760Z endoscope by Fujifilm, enables biopsies in areas with higher degree of inflammation.

Biopsies will be analyzed by an experienced pathologist in the field of EoE. The pathologist will count the number of eosinophilic neurtophils in a high-power field (HPF). The absolut number of eosinophilic neutrophils per HPF will be compared to biopsies taken with standard imaging.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Target biopsies are non-inferior to standard biopsies
Time Frame: 6 months

Target single biopsies with high magnification by a factor of 135, using the EG-760Z endoscope by Fujifilm, in the proximal and distal esophagus are non-inferior to goldstandard biopsies taken with a standard endoscope (4 biopsies proximally and distally) in disease monitoring.

Biopsies will be analyzed by an experienced pathologist in the field of EoE. The pathologist will count the number of eosinophilic neurtophils in a high-power field (HPF). The absolut number of eosinophilic neutrophils per HPF will be compared to biopsies taken with standard imaging.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Zurich

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Luc Biedermann, Universitatsspital Zurich

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 29, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 21, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 24, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 24, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 21, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2020-00817

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Clinical Trials on EG-760Z endoscope by Fujifilm

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings