Real-life Use of Niraparib in a Patient Access Program in Norway

March 2, 2021 updated by: Kristina Lindemann
Retrospective observational study of patients treated with niraparib in an individual patient access program in Norway.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have emerged as new treatment options in ovarian cancer. While there is now also evidence for the efficacy in the first line setting, they were initially studied in recurrent disease both as maintenance after chemotherapy but also as treatment on its own. The NOVA study was conducted in the maintenance setting of patients with recurrent high-grade serous ovarian-, tube or peritoneal cancer who had responded to platinum-based chemotherapy. In 2017 Tesaro opened an individual patient access program in Norway, and in July 2017 the first Norwegian patient was enrolled. We performed a retrospective observational study of patients treated with niraparib in the individual patient access program in Norway. The objective of the study is to provide preliminary efficacy and safety data in a rather unselected population of non-gBRCA patients with recurrent ovarian-, tube-, or peritoneal cancer.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
106

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Norway
      • Oslo, Norway, 0379
        • Oslo University Hospital (OUH)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with relapsed ovarian, fallopian tube or peritoneum cancer in response to platinum based chemotherapy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients enrolled in the individual patient access program since 2017.
  • Patients who have received at least one dose of niraparib will be included.
  • Patients will be identified and recruited from the following participating sites: Oslo University Hospital, Haukeland University Hospital, Stavanger University Hospital, St. Olavs Hospital, University Hospital of Northern Norway and Sørlandet sykehus.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to first subsequent treatment
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 15 months
Date of start of niraparib to start date of subsequent treatment
Through study completion, an average of 15 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to progression
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 18.5 months
Date of start niraparib to date of investigator assessed progression
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 18.5 months
Time to progression assesed by CA-125
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 18.5 months
Date of start niraparib to date of 2xUNL CA-125
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 18.5 months
Type of subsequent chemotherapy if applicable
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 15 months
Type of subsequent chemotherapy
Through study completion, an average of 15 months
Response to subsequent chemotherapy (investigator assessed, measured as ORR and CBR
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 15 months
Response to subsequent chemotherapy (investigator assessed, measured as ORR and CBR
Through study completion, an average of 15 months
Proportion of patients with at least one grade 3 and 4 hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 15 months
Proportion of patients with at least one grade 3 and 4 hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity
Through study completion, an average of 15 months
Frequency of dose interruptions
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 15 months
Frequency of dose interruptions
Through study completion, an average of 15 months
Frequency of dose reductions
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 15 months
Frequency of dose reductions
Through study completion, an average of 15 months
Reasons for discontinuation (i.e. toxicity, progressive disease, patient preferences, other)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 15 months
Reasons for discontinuation (i.e. toxicity, progressive disease, patient preferences, other)
Through study completion, an average of 15 months
Compare progression-free survival data in groups by CA 125 at baseline (normalized vs not normalized)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 15 months
Compare progression-free survival data in groups by CA 125 at baseline (normalized vs not normalized)
Through study completion, an average of 15 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Kristina Lindemann

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University Hospital of North Norway
Haukeland University Hospital
Sorlandet Hospital HF
St. Olavs Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Kristina Lindemann, MD, Oslo University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 31, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 3, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 3, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 27, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 2, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 8, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 2, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • REK 62008

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings