The Evaluation of Free Gingival Graft Operations Around Implant or Teeth on Quality of Life
The Evaluation of Free Gingival Graft Operations Around Implant or Teeth on Quality of Life: Parallel-controlled Prospective Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey, 34500
- Beykent University Faculty of Dentistry
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Non-smoking
- Teeth and implants with keratinized gingiva width <1 mm
- A healthy periodontal and peri-implant condition
- Patients who didn't have ever experience periodontal surgery had first oral surgery experience with dental FGG operation for the first time
- Patients who underwent implant surgery for the first oral surgery experience
- Maximum two teeth/implants on recipient area
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients receiving any medication to disrupt wound healing
- Lactation or pregnancy
- Caries or defects on the tooth root surface
- Periapical lesion in the recipient area active periodontal disease
- Patients who have previously had periodontal or oral surgery experiences
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Free gingival graft around dental implant patients
Test Group (TG) consists of patients have free gingival graft around dental implant patients
|
In the recipient area, a half-thickness flap with two vertical incision widths was removed with a horizontal incision with 15C blades from the mucogingival junction.
The recipient site was determined such that one or two teeth or one tooth extends into the mesial and distal regions of the tooth.
Muscle attachments were dissected and FGG was placed on recipient bed and non-resorbable monofilament sutures were used for fixing the four corners of the graft.
|
|
Active Comparator: Free gingival graft around the teeth
Control Group (CG) consists of patients have free gingival graft around the teeth.
|
In the recipient area, a half-thickness flap with two vertical incision widths was removed with a horizontal incision with 15C blades from the mucogingival junction.
The recipient site was determined such that one or two teeth or one tooth extends into the mesial and distal regions of the tooth.
Muscle attachments were dissected and FGG was placed on recipient bed and non-resorbable monofilament sutures were used for fixing the four corners of the graft.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
General Oral Health Assesment Index (GOHAI) scores- intragroup comparisons change between from baseline to other follow-up times and intergroup comparisons all follow-up times
Time Frame: Baseline, postoperative 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6. and 7. days and first month.
|
The questions that contains 12 items and that give subcategorized about functional limitations, pain and discomfort, psychological impacts, and behavioral impact.
|
Baseline, postoperative 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6. and 7. days and first month.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Age
Time Frame: baseline
|
18-65 years
|
baseline
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Gender
Time Frame: baseline
|
male, female
|
baseline
|
|
Keratinized gingival width (KGW)
Time Frame: baseline, first month
|
the distance between the gingival margin and mucogingival junction from tooth/implant in operation area
|
baseline, first month
|
|
Graft volume (GV)
Time Frame: during surgery
|
graft vertical height X graft mesiodistal length X graft thickness
|
during surgery
|
|
Surgery localization
Time Frame: baseline
|
maxilla, mandible, anterior, posterior
|
baseline
|
|
Operation time
Time Frame: during surgery
|
operation time between of first incision and last suture
|
during surgery
|
|
Satisfaction questionnaires
Time Frame: first month
|
A questionnaire designed by authors with 12 questions was used to assess patient satisfaction.
Answers were either categorized as "positive" or "negative".
|
first month
|
|
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: postoperative 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6. and 7. days
|
a 100-mm horizontal scale and classify the level of postoperative pain experience from 0 (no pain) to 100 (the worst pain ever experienced)
|
postoperative 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6. and 7. days
|
|
Painkiller consumption
Time Frame: postoperative 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6. and 7. days
|
the total number of painkillers for each follow-up day
|
postoperative 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6. and 7. days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: berceste güler, phd, Kutahya Health Sciences University
- Study Director: serap karakış akcan, phd, Beykent University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Berglundh T, Armitage G, Araujo MG, Avila-Ortiz G, Blanco J, Camargo PM, Chen S, Cochran D, Derks J, Figuero E, Hammerle CHF, Heitz-Mayfield LJA, Huynh-Ba G, Iacono V, Koo KT, Lambert F, McCauley L, Quirynen M, Renvert S, Salvi GE, Schwarz F, Tarnow D, Tomasi C, Wang HL, Zitzmann N. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45 Suppl 20:S286-S291. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12957.
- Zucchelli G, Tavelli L, McGuire MK, Rasperini G, Feinberg SE, Wang HL, Giannobile WV. Autogenous soft tissue grafting for periodontal and peri-implant plastic surgical reconstruction. J Periodontol. 2020 Jan;91(1):9-16. doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0350. Epub 2019 Oct 6.
- McGuire MK, Scheyer ET, Gwaltney C. Commentary: incorporating patient-reported outcomes in periodontal clinical trials. J Periodontol. 2014 Oct;85(10):1313-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2014.130693. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
- Locker D, Matear D, Stephens M, Lawrence H, Payne B. Comparison of the GOHAI and OHIP-14 as measures of the oral health-related quality of life of the elderly. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2001 Oct;29(5):373-81. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2001.290507.x.
- Mei CC, Lee FY, Yeh HC. Assessment of pain perception following periodontal and implant surgeries. J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Dec;43(12):1151-1159. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12618. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- B.30.2.AYD.0.00.00-480.2/184
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.