Comparison of Stabilization Exercises Versus Thrust Manipulation Technique on Pelvic Girdle Pain.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Punjab
-
Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan, 54000
- Riphah Rehabilitation Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
• Post-partum females with the normal vaginal delivery present with pelvic girdle pain before the next conception.
- Aged between 18 and 45
- Posterior pelvic girdle pain located distal and/or lateral to the L5-S1
- Pain onset during pregnancy or within 3 weeks after delivery, most recent delivery within 6 to 16 weeks
- Positive posterior pelvic pain provocation (P4) test
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients presenting with the history of:
- Back pain indicating radiculopathy
- Mechanical back pain
- Back pain due to disc herniation
- Rheumatological diseases
- Neurological illness or recent surgery
- Women who have gone through C-section
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Routine physical therapy treatment with the Stabilization exercises
Stabilization exercises
|
The program was based on specific training of the transversely oriented abdominal muscles with coactivation of the lumbar multifidus at the lumbosacral region, training of the gluteus maximus, the latissimus dorsi, the oblique abdominal muscles, the erector spinae, the quadratus lumborum, and the hip adductors and abductors.
Initially, we focused on the specific contraction of the transversely oriented abdominal muscles.
After approximately 2 weeks, loading was progressively increased throughout the intervention period.
The women were required to exercise for 30 to 60 minutes, 3 days a week, for 3-4 weeks.
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Routine physical therapy treatment + High-velocity thrust manipulation
High-velocity thrust manipulation
|
: For high-velocity thrust technique, a modified Chicago technique was used.
For this procedure, the lumbopelvic region was targeted.
The side to be treated was chosen, based on the subject's report of her most symptomatic side.
The physical therapist, performed passively side bend the subject toward the painful side, rotate the upper body in the direction opposite to the side bending, and then deliver a quick posterior and inferior thrust at a grade V including a small-amplitude/high-velocity therapeutic movement.
A maximum of 2 attempts per side was permitted if no pop was heard following the first attempt.
If the subject showed improvement of 50% or less after the first treatment, the intervention was categorized as a failure, the examination and intervention were repeated, and the subjects were asked to return 2 to 4 days later.
If the subject showed greater than 50% improvement, the intervention was categorized as a success, and study participation was concluded.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Visual analog scale
Time Frame: 2 months
|
The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain.
Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain."
|
2 months
|
|
Oswestry disability index
Time Frame: 2 months
|
The ODI score (index) is calculated as: If all 10 sections are completed the score is calculated as follows: if 16 (total scored) out of 50 (total possible score) x 100 = 32% If one section is missed (or not applicable) the score is calculated: If 16 (total scored) / 45 (total possible score) x 100 = 35.5%
|
2 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Bastiaanssen JM, de Bie RA, Bastiaenen CH, Essed GG, van den Brandt PA. A historical perspective on pregnancy-related low back and/or pelvic girdle pain. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005 May 1;120(1):3-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.11.021.
- Bergstrom C, Persson M, Mogren I. Sick leave and healthcare utilisation in women reporting pregnancy related low back pain and/or pelvic girdle pain at 14 months postpartum. Chiropr Man Therap. 2016 Feb 15;24:7. doi: 10.1186/s12998-016-0088-9. eCollection 2016.
- Vermani E, Mittal R, Weeks A. Pelvic girdle pain and low back pain in pregnancy: a review. Pain Pract. 2010 Jan-Feb;10(1):60-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00327.x. Epub 2010 Oct 26.
- Robinson HS, Eskild A, Heiberg E, Eberhard-Gran M. Pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy: the impact on function. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(2):160-4. doi: 10.1080/00016340500410024.
- Bergstrom C, Persson M, Nergard KA, Mogren I. Prevalence and predictors of persistent pelvic girdle pain 12 years postpartum. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Sep 16;18(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1760-5.
- Eggen MH, Stuge B, Mowinckel P, Jensen KS, Hagen KB. Can supervised group exercises including ergonomic advice reduce the prevalence and severity of low back pain and pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy? A randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2012 Jun;92(6):781-90. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110119. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB-UOL-FAHS/659 Anam Naz
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.