Assessment of Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Topical Ozonated Oil in the Management of Palatal Wound Healing After Free Gingival Graft Harvest
Clinical and Cytological Assessment of Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Topical Ozonated Oil in the Management of Palatal Wound Healing After Free Gingival Graft Harvest
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Many surgical techniques have been suggested to enhance the width of keratinized tissue either by free gingival grafts (FGGs) or by sub-epithelial connective tissue grafts. FGG is easy to carry out and qualify the harvest of large quantities of connective tissues (CT). Contrariwise, it produces a site of secondary intention wound healing with discomfort and pain. Excessive post-operative morbidity has been reported in the literature as a possible complication of harvesting a FGG; different procedures with primary-intention healing have been proposed to overcome this problem.
The use of a platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membrane to coat the fresh wound may accelerate the process of healing by providing a more stable rigid fibrin mesh, which is better than a blood clot and supplying a sustained release of growth factors promoting rapid hemostasis at the FGG donor site. PRF is a platelet concentrate obtained by inexpensive and simple procedure that does not need biochemical blood handling, it promotes efficient neovascularization, hastened wound closure and rapid cicatricial tissue remodeling through its three-dimensional fibrin meshwork. PRF owing its energizing effect on wound healing as it provides a superb scaffold for epithelialization and angiogenesis together with the presence of many growth factors such as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), epidermal growth factor and fibroblast growth factor (FGF).
Presently, most of researches in dental field using either ozone gas only, dissolved in water (ozonated water) or in plant oils such as olive oil (ozonated oil), focusing on its excellent antimicrobial efficacy, enhancement of wound healing in oral cavity without the possibility of drug resistance.
Oral wound healing is a dynamic process and complex phenomenon involving series overlapping stages of restoring tissue and cellular structures. Cellular and biochemical events in wound healing can be divided into several phases: inflammation, granulation tissue formation, matrix formation, re-epithelialization and tissue remodeling. Epithelial healing or re-epithelialization is an important process that involves the interactions between keratinocytes and extracellular matrix upon which cells migrate, proliferate and differentiate, hence restoring tissue function and structure. The rate of re-epithelization is considered as one of the criteria that reflect the influence of PRF and ozonated oil on healing of wound sites.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Giza, Egypt, 002
- October 6 University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- (a) age ≥18 years and (b) healthy individuals without any systemic condition that might affect directly on the inflammatory status.
Exclusion Criteria:
- (1) patients with coagulation disorders, (2) severe psychiatric disorders, (3) heavy smokers, (4) patients wearing complete or partial denture that had any contact with the palate, (5) lactating or pregnant females and (6) no FGG harvested previously from the site.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: PRF group
The PRF was prepared according to Choukroun et al. [5] immediately before surgery, a 10 ml blood sample was taken by venipuncture of the antecubital vein without anticoagulant. The tubes were centrifuged immediately by a dedicated centrifuge at 3,000 rpm for 10 minutes. A structured fibrin clot was produced by such preparation protocol in the middle of the tube, with the erythrocytes at the bottom and acellular plasma at the top. Following elimination of acellular plasma, a sterile scissors was used to separate the PRF from the erythrocytes. A membrane of PRF was formed by squeezing it gently between two pieces of gauze. Folding of the membrane was performed to achieve the required thickness (1.0 mm) with accurate trimming to match the palatal wound. The obtained membrane was then placed at the palatal donor site and compressed with gauze. Then, it was secured with 3-0 black plaited silk and a stent was placed. |
All patients in ozone group were asked to visit the clinic on a daily basis through the first week and have their allocated therapeutic medication applied to their particular palatal donor site wounds.
The wounds were coated with 2 ml ozonated oil per day, with a concentration of 15 µg of ozone/ml of olive oil.
Moreover, palatal wounds in control group were managed by compressing the donor site with gauze and periodontal pack was placed.
Patients in ozone group used a soft stent to protect the palatal donor wound site and to retain the tested oils in the post harvested palatal wounds.
Patients were instructed firmly not to shatter the stent for 1 week.
The stent was removed and reseated only by the operator during the application of medications and collection of smears.
One week postoperatively, the protective stents were discontinued.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Control group
the palatal wounds in control group were managed by compressing the donor site with gauze and periodontal pack was placed.
Patients in control group used a soft stent to protect the palatal donor wound site .
Patients were instructed firmly not to shatter the stent for 1 week.
The stent was removed and reseated only by the operator during the application of medications and collection of smears.
One week postoperatively, the protective stents were discontinued.
|
All patients in ozone group were asked to visit the clinic on a daily basis through the first week and have their allocated therapeutic medication applied to their particular palatal donor site wounds.
The wounds were coated with 2 ml ozonated oil per day, with a concentration of 15 µg of ozone/ml of olive oil.
Moreover, palatal wounds in control group were managed by compressing the donor site with gauze and periodontal pack was placed.
Patients in ozone group used a soft stent to protect the palatal donor wound site and to retain the tested oils in the post harvested palatal wounds.
Patients were instructed firmly not to shatter the stent for 1 week.
The stent was removed and reseated only by the operator during the application of medications and collection of smears.
One week postoperatively, the protective stents were discontinued.
|
|
Experimental: ozonated group
the palatal wound in ozanaited group will be painted by ozainated oil 2ml daily for 1 week, Patients used a soft stent to protect the palatal donor wound site .
Patients were instructed firmly not to shatter the stent for 1 week.
The stent was removed and reseated only by the operator during the application of medications and collection of smears.
One week postoperatively, the protective stents were discontinued.
|
All patients in ozone group were asked to visit the clinic on a daily basis through the first week and have their allocated therapeutic medication applied to their particular palatal donor site wounds.
The wounds were coated with 2 ml ozonated oil per day, with a concentration of 15 µg of ozone/ml of olive oil.
Moreover, palatal wounds in control group were managed by compressing the donor site with gauze and periodontal pack was placed.
Patients in ozone group used a soft stent to protect the palatal donor wound site and to retain the tested oils in the post harvested palatal wounds.
Patients were instructed firmly not to shatter the stent for 1 week.
The stent was removed and reseated only by the operator during the application of medications and collection of smears.
One week postoperatively, the protective stents were discontinued.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
the Healing
Time Frame: assessed weekly for 1 month
|
The healing assesed by healing index 1- very poor. 5- excellent |
assessed weekly for 1 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Pain
Time Frame: after 24 hours and 1 week
|
assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS)
|
after 24 hours and 1 week
|
|
cytological analysis
Time Frame: after 7, 14, 21 days and 2 months
|
assess the re-epithelization and keratinization rate
|
after 7, 14, 21 days and 2 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 0000034
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Inadequately Attached Gingiva (Disorder)
-
NCT05273476CompletedInadequately Attached Gingiva
-
NCT05287763RecruitingGingival Recession | Inadequately Attached Gingiva
-
NCT02904551CompletedFailure of Dental Implant Due to Lack of Attached Gingiva
-
NCT02511977CompletedFailure of Dental Implant Due to Lack of Attached Gingiva | Failure of Dental Prosthesis Causing Loss of Dental Implant
-
NCT04920136RecruitingGingival Recession | Thin Gingiva | Lack of Keratinized Attached Peri-implant Mucosa
-
NCT07316205CompletedGingiva Disorder
-
NCT03274674CompletedCondition | Blood Clot | Periodontoclasia | Gingiva; Injury | Gingiva Disorder
-
NCT03570333CompletedGingival Recession | Lack of Keratinized Gingiva (Disorder)
Clinical Trials on ozonated oil
-
NCT05620550Not yet recruitingHealing Surgical Wounds
-
NCT07559617CompletedCosmetic Management of Oily Scalp
-
NCT07328698RecruitingInguinal Hernia Unilateral | Postoperative Wound Inflammation
-
NCT06351033Active, not recruiting
-
NCT07265089Not yet recruitingCarious Anterior Teeth
-
NCT02066337CompletedPeriodontal Diseases
-
NCT06990282Not yet recruitingPeriodontal Diseases | Gingivitis | Periodontitis and Treatment Need
-
NCT07197073CompletedOral Hygiene | Oral Health
-
NCT07316738Not yet recruiting