Directional Versus Nondirectional DBS for ET
Directional Versus Nondirectional Deep Brain Stimulation of the VIM Thalamic Nucleus for Essential Tremor: Assessment of Therapeutic Window, Speech, Gait and Balance
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Specific Aims:
To compare the therapeutic window (TW) of directional versus nondirectional deep brain stimulation for treatment of tremor.
Hypothesis: directional DBS will result in a wider TW than nondirectional DBS.
- To compare the effects of directional versus nondirectional DBS on speech Hypothesis: Objective and subjective speech impairment will occur to a greater extent in nondirectional DBS versus directional DBS optimized for tremor control.
- To compare the effects of directional versus nondirectional DBS on balance and gait Hypothesis: Objective and subjective balance and gait impairment will occur to a greater extent in nondirectional DBS versus directional DBS optimized for tremor control.
- To assess efficacy for tremor of nondirectional and directional DBS in an optimized programming configuration Hypothesis: both directional and nondirectional DBS will significantly improve tremor compared to baseline.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Zoe Fanning
- Phone Number: 503-494-7772
- Email: fanningz@ohsu.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Oregon
-
Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
- Recruiting
- Oregon Health & Science University
-
Contact:
- Zoe Fanning
- Phone Number: 503-494-7772
- Email: fanningz@ohsu.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- A tremor syndrome of bilateral upper limb action tremor with at least 3 years' duration
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who have decided not to receive DBS for control of their medication-refractory essential tremor.
- Patients with secondary tremor (ie not Essential Tremor), such as side effects from medications, secondary to another identified neurologic disease (eg multiple sclerosis, -----Parkinson's disease, dystonia).
- Prior history of deep brain stimulation.
- Prior history of thalamotomy.
- A history or signs of dystonia, ataxia or parkinsonism.
- Task specific tremor.
- Orthostatic tremor.
- Patients with cardiac pacemakers, defibrillators, or neurostimulators.
- Patients who require MRI, ECT, rTMS, or diathermy.
- Subjects with other type of neurological disease or injury.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Directional deep brain stimulation
Deep brain stimulation delivered in a directional manner within an axial plane
|
Deep brain stimulation of the thalamus, in a directional and nondirectional manner
|
|
Active Comparator: Nondirectional deep brain stimulation
Deep brain stimulation delivered in a nondirectional manner within an axial plane
|
Deep brain stimulation of the thalamus, in a directional and nondirectional manner
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Therapeutic window
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Range of therapeutic current from clinical improvement to side effect threshold, measured in milliamps, within a range of 0.0 to 5.0 milliamps
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Improvement of tremor
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Change in The Essential Tremor Rating Scale (TETRAS) combined score.
Range = 0 to112.
Higher score = worse outcome.
|
3 months
|
|
Compare the effects of directional versus nondirectional DBS on self perception of speech
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Self Perception of speech: Subjects will rate their "ability to speak" on a VAS (from 0 [normal] to 100 mm [worst]) in each condition.
|
3 months
|
|
Compare the effects of directional versus nondirectional DBS on balance and gait
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale is a 16-item self-report measure in which participants rate their balance confidence on a 0-100 scale (0 = 0 no confidence, 100 = 100 complete confidence).
|
3 months
|
|
Compare the effects of directional versus nondirectional DBS on perceptual assessment of voice and speech
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Perceptual assessment of voice and speech will be completed with listeners judging a reading sample using a 100mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
|
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00020724
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Essential Tremor
-
NCT07428447RecruitingEssential Tremor | Essential Tremor-plus | Essential Tremor, Movement Disorders
-
NCT02111369CompletedEssential Tremor | Essential Vocal Tremor | Essential Voice Tremor | Voice Tremor | Vocal Tremor
-
NCT07526155Completed
-
NCT01864525CompletedEssential Voice Tremor | Voice Tremor | Vocal Tremor | Essential Tremor of Voice
-
NCT07212244RecruitingEssential Tremor | Essential Tremor, Movement Disorders
-
NCT07484152Not yet recruiting
-
NCT05897775RecruitingEssential Tremor | Upper Extremity Essential Tremor
-
NCT05234762Recruiting
-
NCT00524056CompletedEssential Tremor, Movement Disorders
-
NCT03935581Active, not recruitingNeurologic Manifestations | Tremor | Tremor, Essential
Clinical Trials on Deep brain stimulation of the VIM Thalamic nuclei
-
NCT02558634CompletedDeep Brain Stimulation | Spasmodic Dysphonia | Laryngeal Dystonia
-
NCT01072656Completed
-
NCT02881151CompletedTBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)
-
NCT02892851Unknown
-
NCT07455760RecruitingEssential Tremor | Parkinson's Disease (PD)
-
NCT06303869RecruitingCardiovascular Diseases | Stroke | Central Nervous System Diseases | Nervous System Diseases | Brain Disease
-
NCT00142259Unknown
-
NCT00272246UnknownDystonia | Primary Generalized Dystonia