Promoting Equity for Cancer Screening and Follow-up

October 19, 2021 updated by: Chyke A. Doubeni, Mayo Clinic

Promoting Equity Through Multicomponent Strategies for Cancer Screening and Follow-up (PREMiS)

This is a randomized trial to assess the efficacy of reminder mechanisms on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake among a cohort of patients who were previously mailed a multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test and did not complete the screening. Patients will be identified as being due for CRC screening and will be mailed a mt-sDNA kit to their home. Patients who do not complete screening with mt-sDNA within 30 days will be identified and randomized into one of three study arms to receive reminders to complete the mt-sDNA screening. The primary outcome is the rate of completion of screening for colorectal cancer with mt-sDNA test.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States, and screening has been shown to reduce mortality from CRC. Screening is underutilized in the United States, particularly in some communities such as Blacks/African Americans, American Indians/Alaskan Natives, and rural populations, contributing to disparities in mortality.

For CRC screening, mt-sDNA testing is one of several tests that are recommended by the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). As part of a quality improvement program at our institution, those who are due for CRC screening are identified using a validated electronic algorithm and a kit is mailed directly to each patient. Our intervention is initiated on non-respondents to the mailed mt-sDNA outreach by testing the use of a technology-enabled reminder system.

Thirty days after being mailed a mt-sDNA kit, patients who have not completed the screening will be randomized to receive a reminder to complete the mt-sDNA screening by one of three mechanisms (time 0):

  1. Automated reminder using the EHR patient portal messaging system.
  2. Automated reminder using a customized interactive voice response (IVR) system
  3. Personalized reminder phone calls from the clinical team

This will allow for an empirical test of processes that can be employed to improve delivery of CRC screening and reduce preventable deaths in populations that are underserved with evidence-based interventions.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults, between 50 to 75 years old.
  • Due for colorectal cancer screening based on not having a record of a colonoscopy within 10 years, sigmoidoscopy, or CT colonography within 5 years, mt-sDNA within 3 years, or FIT within 1 year.
  • Asymptomatic for colorectal cancer such as rectal bleeding or reported abdominal mass.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • For the intervention study, patients will be restricted to those aged 50 to 75 years and are due for colorectal cancer screening.
  • We will exclude any patient who has:
  • Had prior colonoscopy within 10 years, sigmoidoscopy within 5 years, mt-sDNA within 3 years, CT colonography within 5 years, and FOBT/FIT within twelve months of inclusion into the study;
  • A diagnosis of CRC or other GI cancer;
  • History of confirmed Inflammatory Bowel Disease (Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis) or other colitis;
  • Had a colectomy, partial or total;
  • A diagnosis of Lynch Syndrome;
  • A diagnosis of Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP);
  • Iron deficiency anemia;
  • Lower GI bleeding;
  • A metastatic (Stage IV) blood or solid tumor cancer;
  • End stage renal disease;
  • A first degree relative with CRC prior to age 50 or 2+ first degree relatives diagnosed at any age.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: IVR Reminder
Participants will receive an interactive voice reminder
Other: IVR Reminder
Participants will receive an interactive voice reminder (IVR) to complete mt-sDNA screening at day 7 and 21.
Active Comparator: Personalized Phone Call Reminder
Participants will receive a personalized phone call
Other: Phone call from research team
Patients will receive a scripted phone call from the research team to remind them to complete the mt-sDNA screening at day 7 and 21.
Active Comparator: Portal Message Only
Participants will receive a online patient portal message reminder
Other: EHR Portal message
Patients will receive an EHR patient portal message with a scripted message to remind them to complete the mt-sDNA screening at day 7 and 21.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Endpoint (intention-to-treat)
Time Frame: Completion by 6 months post randomization
The completion rate of mt-sDNA among eligible patients. The primary comparison will be the return rate compared across intervention arms.
Completion by 6 months post randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary Outcome (per protocol analysis)
Time Frame: Completion by 6 months post randomization
The completion rate of mt-sDNA among eligible patients. The comparison will be the return rate compared across intervention arms, excluding participants who received an alternative intervention due to not having appropriate portal access.
Completion by 6 months post randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Mayo Clinic

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Chyke Doubeni, MBBS, MPH, Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 1, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 1, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 5, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 27, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 19, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20-012010

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colorectal (Colon or Rectal) Cancer

Clinical Trials on IVR Reminder

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings