Randomized Comparison Between Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Lymph Node Dissection in Early Stage Endometrial Cancer (SELYE)

February 18, 2022 updated by: Jeong-Yeol Park, MD, PhD, Asan Medical Center

Prospective Randomized Comparison of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping Using Indocyanine Green and Conventional Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Clinical Stage I-II Endometrial Cancer

Through this clinical trial, the investigators aim to verify the usefulness and stability of sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer of clinical stage I-II.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The standard treatment for endometrial cancer is total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, peritoneal cytology, and lymph node dissection. Pelvic lymph node dissection helps to set accurate staging and adjuvant therapy group, but it has never been proven to have therapeutic effects by itself. According to the results of two recent randomized clinical trials, routine pelvic lymph node dissection in early stage endometrial cancer doesn't improve survival rates.

Routine pelvic lymph node detection can cause complications in a large number of patients and is associated with poor quality of life. Therefore, it is important to develop a method that can check the status of the lymph node in a less invasive way. Efforts have been made to preserve other lymph nodes with significantly less potential for metastasis through less invasive methods, reducing lymph edema and complications such as bleeding and nerve damage caused by excessive surgery.

Sentinel lymph node dissection is used as a standard treatment for breast cancer and malignant melanoma, and efforts to develop it have recently continued in endometrial cancer and cervical cancer. A SENTICOL study conducted in cervical cancer patients showed a false-negative rate of 0% when both were monitored lymph node dissection. In addition, unlike routine pelvic lymph node dissection, ultra-staging through 0,2mm gas intercepts allow additional detection of less than 2mm of microtransfer or less than 0.2mm of independent tumor cells that have not been found before. In a recent large-scale prospective study of endometrial cancer, sentinel lymph node mapping using indocyanine green and fluorescent imaging was successful at 86%, and sensitivity (patient-by-patient analysis) reported 100% in diagnosis of lymph node metastasis.

As laparoscopic and robotic surgery account for most of the treatment of endometrial cancer patients, a good environment is created for monitoring lymph node exploration using ICG, and sensitivity and detection rate seem to have improved compared to the previous method. However, there has been no prospective study on the effects of patient clinical prognosis, such as a standard treatment, pelvic lymph node resection, and disease-free survival rate, and overall survival rate, so a prospective study is essential. The investigators compare survival rates in the group that does sentinel lymph node mapping and routine pelvic lymph node detection in endometrial cancer in clinical stage I-II.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
810

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Asan Medical Center
        • Contact:
          • Jeong-Yeol Park

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 20 ~ 80 years old female
  2. histologically diagnosed endometrial cancer that has never been treated before.
  3. histological type :endometrioid, mucinous, serous, clear cell, uindifferentiated, dedifferentiated, mesonephric adenocarcinoma, mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma, carcinosarcoma, and mixed type
  4. histological grade : FIGO grade 1, 2, 3
  5. Presumed FIGO stage I-II
  6. Planed for laparoscopic or robotic hystererctomy and lymph adenectomy
  7. Largest pelvic or para-aortic lymph node diameter = or < 15 mm in short axis on MRI
  8. ECOG performance status 0-2
  9. ASA PS 0-2
  10. WBC ≥ 3,000/mm3, Platelets ≥ 100,000/mm3, Creatinine ≤ 2.0 mg/dL ,Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x institutional upper limit normal ,SGOT, SGPT, and ALP ≤ 3 x institutional upper limit normal
  11. A patient who voluntarily signed a document for the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presumed FIGO stage III-IV
  2. Neuroendocrine tumor histology
  3. Other disease involving lymphatic system
  4. lymphedema of the lower extremity or inguinal area
  5. previous pelvic or paraaortic lymph node dissection
  6. previous radiation or concurrent chemoradiation therapy of abdomen or pelvis
  7. previous chemotherapy due to malignant disease of abdomen or pelvis
  8. Patients who have had or have been treated for cancer within five years, other than non-melanoma skin cancer, carcinoma in situ of uterine cervix, stomach or bladder
  9. severe, uncontrolled underlying diseases or underlying disease with complications
  10. hypersensitivity to indocyanine green
  11. a pregnant or breast-feeding woman

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Sentinel lymph node mapping
The group composed of patients who undergo sentinel lymph node mapping
Procedure: Sentinel lymph node mapping

Laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy with/without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy 2. Inject 1.25 mg/ml of ICG and a total of 6ml into the cornual area (0.5-1 cm deep) of the uterus. And then inject 1 ml of mucous membrane (1-3 mm deep) and 1 ml of substrate (1-2 cm deep) into the cervix, and a total of 4 ml in each direction of 3 and 9 o'clock.

3. Sentinel lymph node is excised

Other Names:
  • Indocyanine green
  • Fluorescent camera
Active Comparator: Routine lymph node dissection
The group composed of patients who undergo routine pelvic lymph node dissection
Procedure: Routine lymph node dissection
  1. Laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy with/without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy
  2. Lymph node detection is performed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The 3-year disease-free survival (3-year DFS)
Time Frame: 3 years
The time interval between the date of surgery and the date of recurrence will be caculated as month. The survival curve will be calculated suing Kaplan-Meir method, and survival difference will be compared using Log-rank test.
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgery-related morbidity rate
Time Frame: One month
Compare the surgery-related morbidity rate after one month of surgery.
One month
Incidence of lymphocele and lymphedema
Time Frame: 3 years
After 3 years of surgery, the incidence of lymphocele and lymphedema are compared.
3 years
The 3-year overall survival (3-year OS)
Time Frame: 3 years
The time interval between the date of surgery and the date of death of disease will be caculated as month. The survival curve will be calculated suing Kaplan-Meir method, and survival difference will be compared using Log-rank test.
3 years
The 5-year disease free survival (5-year DFS)
Time Frame: 5 years
The time interval between the date of surgery and the date of recurrence will be caculated as month. The survival curve will be calculated suing Kaplan-Meir method, and survival difference will be compared using Log-rank test.
5 years
The 5-year overall survival (5-year OS)
Time Frame: 5-years
The time interval between the date of surgery and the date of death of disease will be caculated as month. The survival curve will be calculated suing Kaplan-Meir method, and survival difference will be compared using Log-rank test.
5-years
The pattern of recurrence
Time Frame: 3 years
Anatomic location of first recurrence
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Asan Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 26, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 12, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 14, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 15, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 21, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 18, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • KGOG 2029

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endometrial Cancer

Clinical Trials on Sentinel lymph node mapping

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings