A Phase 3 Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of PK101 in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Active-controlled, Parallel-designed, Phase 3 Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of PK101 Compared With PK101-002 in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Jeonju, Korea, Republic of, 54907
- Recruiting
- Jeonbuk National University Hospital
-
Contact:
- Wan-Hee Yoo
- Phone Number: 82-63-250-2377
- Email: ywhim@chonbuk.ac.kr
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients ≥40 and of age
- Patients who meets the American College Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and has lasted for at least three months after diagnosis of one-sided or bilateral knee osteoarthritis.
- Radiographic evidence of grade 1 ~ 3 osteoarthritis based on the Kellgren & Lawrence radiographic entry criteria at visit 1
- Score of 100mm pain VAS ≤ 80mm at visit 1
- Written consent form voluntarily
- Score of 100mm pain VAS ≥ 40mm at visit 3
- Patients with an individual medication compliance of 70% or more of the IP administered during the Run-in period
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who has a history of hypersensitivity to components of IP, NSAIDs including COX-2 inhibitors, a history of hypersensitivity to aspirin, or allergic reactions to sulfonamides
- Patients with inflammatory, infectious, metabolic, septic arthritis or rheumatoid arthritis other than osteoarthritis
- Patients with a condition that can affect the joints
- Patients who have undergone arthroscopic surgery within 1 year , knee joint surgery within 5 years, synoviorthesis within 3 months prior to visit 1 to the target knee, or who have planned surgery during the trial period
Patients who have used corticosteroids as follows:
- Inj. of corticosteroid, including intraarticular administration, into the target knee within 3 months prior to visit 1
- Oral corticosteroid administration within 1 month prior to visit 1
- Patients who have intraarticular injected hyaluronic acid or cell therapy products, gene therapy products, etc. for the treatment of osteoarthritis within 3 months prior to visit 1
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: PK101 group
|
1 tablet at each time, 2 times a day
1 tablet at each time, 2 times a day
|
|
Active Comparator: PK101-002 group
|
1 tablet at each time, 2 times a day
1 tablet at each time, 2 times a day
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change during activity in 100mm Pain VAS
Time Frame: baseline through week 8
|
Visual Analogue Scale, 0 mm no pain, 100 mm worst pain ever
|
baseline through week 8
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change during activity in 100mm Pain VAS
Time Frame: baseline through week 4
|
Visual Analogue Scale, 0 mm no pain, 100 mm worst pain ever
|
baseline through week 4
|
|
Change at rest in 100mm Pain VAS
Time Frame: baseline through week 4, 8
|
Visual Analogue Scale, 0 mm no pain, 100 mm worst pain ever
|
baseline through week 4, 8
|
|
Change in WOMAC(Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index using the Visual Analogue Scale, Version 3.1) sub scale & total score
Time Frame: baseline through week 4, 8
|
Assessment of pain, stiffness and physical function.
Score range 0-500 mm for Pain, 0-200 mm for Stiffness, and 0-1700 mm for Physical Function.
Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.
|
baseline through week 4, 8
|
|
Change in PGA
Time Frame: baseline through week 8
|
PGA for disease severity (Patient's Global Assessment, 1=Very good, 2=Good, 3=Fair, 4=Poor, 5=Very Poor)
|
baseline through week 8
|
|
Change in SF-36 sub scale & PCS, MCS as measured by Health Survey(Short Form, SF-36 v2, Physical Component Summary, Mental Component Summary)
Time Frame: baseline through week 8
|
The SF-36 v2 is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient's health, consisting of 2 components(the PCS and the MCS) included 8 subscales. Patients rated their QoL using a 2-6 point Likert Scale. Score is converting the original score to 0~100 points. The lower score means poor health status, and the higher score, the better. |
baseline through week 8
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- PK101_P301
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.