Customized Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstruction
Accuracy, Fitness, Compatibility, and Clinical Outcomes of Customized Implants and Prosthesis in Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstruction
Regional oral and maxillofacial defects secondary to ablative tissue resection can contribute to severe aesthetic and functional loss, which influences patients' regular life and may cause psychological problems. Microvascular free flaps are considered the gold standard for reconstructing large oral and maxillofacial defects. In the past decade, with the help of computer-aided design (CAD)/ computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) customized implants and prosthesis (CIP) have led to a significant improvement of the operative accuracy, improve the flap survival rate and enhance the patients' quality of life.
Concerning the increased overall survival rate of the patients, people pay more attention to the quality of life and aesthetic appearance which are influenced by the fitness and compatibility of the CIP. However, from literature reviews, the evaluation was various to be concluded in some certain conditions from pooled studies.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Patients with grafted bone (fibula, iliac, scapula) and receive postoperative implant surgery.
2.Clinical and radiogram data were available for all treatment periods and follow-up visits (Pre-/post-CBCT and panoramic radiographs).
3.Over twelve months follow-up period after implant placement. 4.Age > 18 years. 5.Fabrication and delivery of prosthesis following implant installation. 6.Treatment with a one-stage/two-stage surgical protocol.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients diagnosed with osteoporosis.
- Lost or missing medical history during follow-up period.
- Follow-up period of dental implants was less than 12 months.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
One stage dental implants placement
|
The time of dental implant surgery
|
|
Second stage dental implants placement
|
The time of dental implant surgery
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
The survival rate of the dental implants
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery
|
12 months after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- S63615
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.