Refinement of Suicide Risk Management Intervention
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Monika Lohani, PhD
- Phone Number: 801-587-1737
- Email: Monika.Lohani@utah.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Ohio
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43214
- The Ohio State
-
-
Utah
-
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84112
- University of Utah
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical diagnosis of suicide Ideation
- History of suicide attempts
Exclusion Criteria:
- Geographic location outside the U.S.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Structured interview and Safety Plan
In the structured interview approach, clinicians ask a series of predetermined questions and/or assess a specified set of risk and protective factors, typically using a checklist-based approach.
The safety plan is a written, prioritized list of coping strategies and resources for reducing suicide risk.
|
The safety plan is a written, prioritized list of coping strategies and resources for reducing suicide risk.
In the structured interview approach, clinicians ask a series of predetermined questions and/or assess a specified set of risk and protective factors, typically using a checklist-based approach.
|
|
Active Comparator: Structured interview and Crisis Response Plan
In the structured interview approach, clinicians ask a series of predetermined questions and/or assess a specified set of risk and protective factors, typically using a checklist-based approach.
Crisis response planning intervention teaches a range of coping strategies and provides support that can reduce suicide attempts and ideation.
|
In the structured interview approach, clinicians ask a series of predetermined questions and/or assess a specified set of risk and protective factors, typically using a checklist-based approach.
Crisis response planning intervention teaches a range of coping strategies and provides support that can reduce suicide attempts and ideation.
|
|
Active Comparator: Narrative assessment and Safety Plan
In the narrative assessment approach, clinicians ask patients to "tell the story" of their suicidal crisis.
The safety plan is a written, prioritized list of coping strategies and resources for reducing suicide risk.
|
The safety plan is a written, prioritized list of coping strategies and resources for reducing suicide risk.
In the narrative assessment approach, clinicians ask patients to "tell the story" of their suicidal crisis.
|
|
Active Comparator: Narrative assessment and Crisis Response Plan
In the narrative assessment approach, clinicians ask patients to "tell the story" of their suicidal crisis.
Crisis response planning intervention teaches a range of coping strategies and provides support that can reduce suicide attempts and ideation.
|
Crisis response planning intervention teaches a range of coping strategies and provides support that can reduce suicide attempts and ideation.
In the narrative assessment approach, clinicians ask patients to "tell the story" of their suicidal crisis.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in suicide relevant thoughts and behaviors after the intervention (Self Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors questionnaire)
Time Frame: During an average of 2-weeks pre-intervention, 2-weeks post-intervention, 1 month follow-up after intervention
|
Items from the Self Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors questionnaire (Fox et al., 2020) will be used to assess suicide relevant thoughts and behaviors
|
During an average of 2-weeks pre-intervention, 2-weeks post-intervention, 1 month follow-up after intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Monika Lohani, PhD, University of Utah
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB_00135355
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.