Refinement of Suicide Risk Management Intervention

May 7, 2026 updated by: Monika Lohani, University of Utah
Participants will be randomly assigned to 1 of the 4 interventions using a sequential stratified randomization procedure. We will use sex (M, F) and history of suicide attempts (never, 1, and multiple) as our randomization strata. Participants will be assessed before and after the intervention to study the potential effects of each approach on suicide-related clinical outcomes.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43214
        • The Ohio State
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84112
        • University of Utah

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of suicide Ideation
  • History of suicide attempts

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Geographic location outside the U.S.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Structured interview and Safety Plan
In the structured interview approach, clinicians ask a series of predetermined questions and/or assess a specified set of risk and protective factors, typically using a checklist-based approach. The safety plan is a written, prioritized list of coping strategies and resources for reducing suicide risk.
The safety plan is a written, prioritized list of coping strategies and resources for reducing suicide risk.
In the structured interview approach, clinicians ask a series of predetermined questions and/or assess a specified set of risk and protective factors, typically using a checklist-based approach.
Active Comparator: Structured interview and Crisis Response Plan
In the structured interview approach, clinicians ask a series of predetermined questions and/or assess a specified set of risk and protective factors, typically using a checklist-based approach. Crisis response planning intervention teaches a range of coping strategies and provides support that can reduce suicide attempts and ideation.
In the structured interview approach, clinicians ask a series of predetermined questions and/or assess a specified set of risk and protective factors, typically using a checklist-based approach.
Crisis response planning intervention teaches a range of coping strategies and provides support that can reduce suicide attempts and ideation.
Active Comparator: Narrative assessment and Safety Plan
In the narrative assessment approach, clinicians ask patients to "tell the story" of their suicidal crisis. The safety plan is a written, prioritized list of coping strategies and resources for reducing suicide risk.
The safety plan is a written, prioritized list of coping strategies and resources for reducing suicide risk.
In the narrative assessment approach, clinicians ask patients to "tell the story" of their suicidal crisis.
Active Comparator: Narrative assessment and Crisis Response Plan
In the narrative assessment approach, clinicians ask patients to "tell the story" of their suicidal crisis. Crisis response planning intervention teaches a range of coping strategies and provides support that can reduce suicide attempts and ideation.
Crisis response planning intervention teaches a range of coping strategies and provides support that can reduce suicide attempts and ideation.
In the narrative assessment approach, clinicians ask patients to "tell the story" of their suicidal crisis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in suicide relevant thoughts and behaviors after the intervention (Self Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors questionnaire)
Time Frame: During an average of 2-weeks pre-intervention, 2-weeks post-intervention, 1 month follow-up after intervention
Items from the Self Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors questionnaire (Fox et al., 2020) will be used to assess suicide relevant thoughts and behaviors
During an average of 2-weeks pre-intervention, 2-weeks post-intervention, 1 month follow-up after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Monika Lohani, PhD, University of Utah

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 22, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB_00135355

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Structured Interview

Clinical Trials on Safety Plan

Subscribe