Clinical And Cost- Effectiveness of Allium Sativum Oil (Garlic Oil ) Versus Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in Primary Molars Pulpotomy in Group of Egyptian Children : A Randomised Clinical Pilot Study.
Clinical And Cost- Effectiveness of Allium Sativum Oil Versus Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in Primary Molars Pulpotomy in Group of Egyptian Children : A Randomised Clinical Pilot Study.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 3
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Apparently healthy children aged from 5- 7 years.
- Children not having antibiotics in the past 14 days.
- Cooperative children.
- Children are having at least two carious asymptomatic second primary molars.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Uncooperative children.
- Immunocompromised children.
- Children with clinical or radiographic symptoms
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Allium sativum oil
The pulp stumps of the molars are dressed with a cotton pellet that is made damp with Allium Sativum oil for 1 min .
|
Garlic oil Captain Company (CAP-PHARM)
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Mineral Trioxide Aggregate
The material will be prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions , applied to the pulp chamber and a moistened cotton pellet was placed over the MTA paste to allow the material to set.
|
ProRoot MTA, Dentsply
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical effectiveness
Time Frame: 1 year follow up
|
clinical effectiveness will be measured by intraoral examination and radiographic assessment
|
1 year follow up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: 1 year follow up
|
cost-effectiveness will be measured with incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)
|
1 year follow up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Lobnamagdy128
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.