Ranibizumab Vs Bevacizumab for Type 1 Retinopathy of Prematurity

August 26, 2021 updated by: Ghada Mahmoud Tawfik Ibrahim Eladawy, Zagazig University

Comparison Between Intravitreal Injection of Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab for Treatment of Type 1 Retinopathy of Prematurity

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) with inadequate growth and development of retinal blood vessels in premature infants is one of the foremost reasons for childhood blindness. Recently there is a shift of treatment to VEGF inhibitors which can regress ROP without destroying the peripheral retina. Yet, the best drug has not been identified.Bevacizumab is a larger, full-length immunoglobulin G (IgG) molecule with slower retinal clearance and therefore prolonged diffusion into the systemic circulation, up to 3 weeks. In contrast, the systemic half-life of a Fab molecule, such as ranibizumab, is a few hours. The objective is to compare the efficacy and reliability of intravitreal bevacizumab with standard 0.625 mg dose and intravitreal ranibizumab treatments for type 1 ROP, namely pattern of disease regression, recurrence of ROP, necessity of subsequent ablative procedures.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Objectives

To compare the efficacy and reliability of intravitreal bevacizumab with standard 0.625 mg dose and intravitreal ranibizumab treatments for type 1 ROP, namely pattern of disease regression, recurrence of ROP, necessity of subsequent ablative procedures.

Study population & Sample size Infants with Type 1 ROP (affecting both eyes) screened at neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of Cairo University.

The sample size is calculated to be 36 eyes of 18 infants using open Epi confidence total 95%, power of the study 80% according to the following : the mean SD of axial length of patients with stage 3 ROP using bevacizumab versus ranibizumab (20.3 1.16 versus 19.4 ).

Study Design

This is a prospective, comparative, interventional non inferiority study.

Methods

  • Infants with type 1 ROP affecting both eyes will be included.
  • Before intravitreal injection, the parents or legal guardian of the infants will be informed about the procedure.
  • After written consent is obtained, the pupil will be dilated with 2.5% phenylephrine and 0.5% tropicamide injection.
  • The injections will be performed in the operating theatre under general (light inhalational anesthesia) or topical anesthesia with Benoxinate hydrochloride 0.4%.
  • Povidone iodine10% swab will be applied on the eyelids and eyelashes. A sterile eyelid speculum will be inserted. Each eye will be meticulously bathed with 5% povidone iodine solution for 3 min before intravitreal injection.
  • A dose of 0.25 mg/0.025 mL ranibizumab (Lucentis) is injected in the right eye of the infant and 0.625 mg/0.025 mL bevacizumab is injected into the vitreous cavity of the left eye 1 mm posterior to the superior/inferior temporal limbus via 30 G needle. The two injections are done sequentially on two consecutive days starting with the eye of more advanced disease.
  • Fundus examination will be conducted with an indirect ophthalmoscope and a 28-D lens. The central retinal artery and the lens will be evaluated in addition to whether a retinal tear is present.
  • Postoperative moxifloxacin 0.4% drops will be prescribed 4 times daily for one week.
  • Patients will be seen 24 hours after first injection, to monitor for any signs of infection.
  • Infants will then be seen weekly for 4 weeks and dilated fundus examination and and digital coloured fundus images by RetCam will be performed to document response of the disease.

  • Success criteria to the IVB injection will be defined as, during the follow up period of 60 weeks' postmenstrual age:

    • recovery of the plus disease
    • regression of any stage of ROP
    • progression of peripheral retinal vascularization
  • If any progression occurs in the disease course, in terms of: increase in plus disease or progression to higher stage of ROP, immediate second IVB dose 0.625mg will be given to either groups.
  • Follow-up will be continued for a minimum of one year corrected age or until we ensure complete peripheral retinal vascularization.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
36

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Zagazig, Egypt, 002055
        • Recruiting
        • zagazig University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Infants with a birth weight of ≤ 1500 g or geststional age of ≤ 30 weeks and selected infants with birth weight between 1500 and 2000 g or gestational age of more than 30 weeks with an unstable clinical course, including those requiring cardiorespiratory support. Patients with bilateral disease who will receive bilateral injections, are only included. Type 1 ROP according to ETROP study which is defined as, Zone I ROP with plus disease, Zone I, stage 3 ROP without plus disease and Zone II, stage 2 or 3 ROP with plus disease.

Exclusion Criteria:

Eyes with previous intravitreal injections. Eyes with previous laser therapy. Eyes with any other pathology, other than ROP. Eyes with ROP stage 4 or 5. Eyes with mucopurulent or purulent conjunctivitis. Infants who will not be able to comply to the follow-up schedule.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Eyes with IVI bevacizumab
0.625 mg/0.025 mL bevacizumab is injected into the vitreous cavity of the left eye
Drug: Bevacizumab, Ranibizumab
• A dose of 0.25 mg/0.025 mL ranibizumab (Lucentis) is injected in the right eye of the infant and 0.625 mg/0.025 mL bevacizumab is injected into the vitreous cavity of the left eye 1 mm posterior to the superior/inferior temporal limbus via 30 G needle. The two injections are done sequentially on two consecutive days starting with the eye of more advanced disease.
Other Names:
  • avastin, leucentis
Active Comparator: Eyes with IVI ranibizumab
A dose of 0.25 mg/0.025 mL ranibizumab (Lucentis) is injected in the right eye of the infant
Drug: Bevacizumab, Ranibizumab
• A dose of 0.25 mg/0.025 mL ranibizumab (Lucentis) is injected in the right eye of the infant and 0.625 mg/0.025 mL bevacizumab is injected into the vitreous cavity of the left eye 1 mm posterior to the superior/inferior temporal limbus via 30 G needle. The two injections are done sequentially on two consecutive days starting with the eye of more advanced disease.
Other Names:
  • avastin, leucentis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
• Regression achieved either by single injection or multiple injections or additional laser therapy at 60 weeks postmenstrual age.
Time Frame: 60 weeks PMA
regression of plus disease and the active neovessels
60 weeks PMA

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
• Recurrence of ROP
Time Frame: 60 weeks PMA
(recurrent plus disease, recurrent neovascularization, or reformation of ridge despite treatment)
60 weeks PMA

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
• The number and kind of adverse events, the number of patients progressing to stage 4 or 5.
Time Frame: 60 weeks PMA
stage 4, retinal detachment and stage 5,cicatricial ROP
60 weeks PMA
• The number of reinjections or laser spots and the number of eyes that need lensectomy and vitrectomy.
Time Frame: 60 weeks PMA
reinjection with anti-VEGF, or indirect laser
60 weeks PMA
• Refractive errors in spherical equivalent in patients who only received anti-VEGF treatment, pattern of fixation and ocular alignment.
Time Frame: 60 weeks PMA
Retinoscopy is done to detect errors of refraction
60 weeks PMA

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Zagazig University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Cairo University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ghada Mahmoud Tawfik Eladawy, Msc, zagazig University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 26, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 26, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 2, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 26, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • D-9-2020

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

International Publishing

IPD Sharing Time Frame

two years

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Internet

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)
  • Analytic Code

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings