Clinical Research for Azacitidine Combined With Low-dose Dasatinib in Maintenance Therapy of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

April 21, 2022 updated by: Bei Liu, LanZhou University
This project is a prospective, single-center study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and related mechanisms of azacitidine combined with low-dose dasatinib in maintenance therapy in patients with intermediate and high-risk acute myeloid leukemia(AML). The patients were randomly divided into azacitidine group and azacitidine combined with low-dose dasatinib group. The overall survival and disease-free survival were taken as the main end points, and the mortality and recurrence rate were taken as the secondary end points, meanwhile, the incidence of adverse events were evaluated. At the same time, the mRNA expressions of DNA methyltransferase (DNMT1, DNMT3a, DNMT3b), tumor suppressor genes (TP53, P15, P16, P21, CDH1, DOK6, SHP1, PTPN11) and differentiation genes (pu.1, C/EBP α, C/EBP β) were detected. Pyrophosphate sequencing was used to detect the methylation level of the promoter region of these tumor suppressor genes. Western Blot was used to detect apoptosis proteins (caspase3, caspase8) and phosphorylated proteins (pSTAT3, pSTAT5, pAKT). The proportion of apoptotic population of bone marrow cells was determined by flow cytometry. Therefore, the data in this study will reflect the efficacy and safety of azacitidine or azacitidine combined with low-dose dasatinib in real-world maintenance therapy in patients with medium and high-risk AML.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In addition to studying the overall survival, disease-free survival and recurrence rates, mortality and incidence of adverse events of patients treated with azacitidine or azacitidine combined with low-dose dasatinib, we will also study its related mechanisms. One of the pathogenesis of AML is that abnormal DNA methylation makes the cell cycle out of control and carcinogenesis by inhibiting the expression of tumor suppressor genes. In addition, the abnormal activation of tyrosine kinase signal pathway also promotes the development of leukemia. Azacitidine, the hypomethylating agents, can not only inhibit the DNA methyltransferase family, but also activate tumor suppressor genes to inhibit a variety of tyrosine kinase signaling pathways, including JAK-STAT. NaShen et al have directly demonstrated that tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can not only inhibit the abnormal activation of tyrosine kinase pathway, but also reduce DNA methylation. This study found that the combination of the second generation TKIs and hypomethylating agents can reduce has a synergistic effect on promoting apoptosis and reducing DNA methylation. In addition, TKIs often produces drug resistance due to long exposure time, and the main mechanisms of drug resistance is due to DNA methylation and abnormal reactivation of tyrosine kinase signal pathway. The combination of TKI and azacitidine reduces DNA methylation and inhibits the reactivation of abnormal tyrosine kinase signal pathway, which is helpful to improve TKI drug resistance. Based on the above theory, we assume that patients treated with azacitidine and dasatinib may have more obvious demethylation effect, increased expression of tumor suppressive genes, more obvious apoptosis, and inhibition of phosphorylated protein expression.So we did the lab tests of these mechanisms.We innovatively used azacitidine and TKIs in the treatment of patients with AML maintenance, in order to reduce drug toxicity, enhance drug efficacy, improve patient prognosis and reduce the financial burden of patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Gansu
      • Lanzhou, Gansu, China, 730000
        • Recruiting
        • The First Hospital of Lanzhou University
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Long Zhao
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Haizhen Ma
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Juan Cheng, MD
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Bei Liu, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jinli Jian
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Hao Zhang

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with intermediate and high-risk AML who are diagnosed according to the 2016 WHO guidelines, aged ≥18 years;
  2. Detect minimal residual disease(-) after induction therapy and consolidation therapy;
  3. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score 0-2;

  4. The heart, pulmonary, liver and kidneys have sufficient organ functions:

    1. Cardiac color doppler ultrasound shows cardiac ejection fraction> 50%, heart function classification NYHA III/IV, no heart block or arrhythmia;
    2. Patients without severe restrictive/obstructive pulmonary disease;
    3. Liver function: total bilirubin (TBIL) < 2 times the upper limit of normal, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) <2.5 times the upper limit of normal;
    4. Renal function: serum creatinine (Cr) < 1.5 times the upper limit of normal.
  5. The patient and family members agree and sign an informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with malignant tumors of other organs;

  2. HCV positive; or HIV positive; or one of the following HBV test results:

    1. HBsAg positive;
    2. HBsAg negative, HBcAb positive and HBV DNA titer positive;
  3. Pregnant and lactating women, and patients who have family planning during the enrollment period;
  4. Patients considered to be unsuitable for enrollment by the investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: experimental group
Patients with intermediate and high risk AML were negative for minimal residual disease after intensive induction and consolidation chemotherapy,the patients were randomly divided into two groups, and one group was given azacitidine(75mg/m2, per day on day 1-7]. Dasatinib 100 mg p.o. qd was administered on days 1-28 of each consolidation cycle.
Drug: Azacitidine
Azacitidine, 75mg/m2,d1-7;Treatment cycles every 28 days
Drug: Dasatinib
dasatinib,20mg,po,qd,treatment cycles every 28 days
Active Comparator: control group
Patients with intermediate and high risk AML were negative for minimal residual disease after intensive induction and consolidation chemotherapy,the patients were randomly divided into two groups, and the other group was given azacitidine(75mg/m2, per day on day 1-7)on days 1-28 of each consolidation cycle.
Drug: Azacitidine
Azacitidine, 75mg/m2,d1-7;Treatment cycles every 28 days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
overall survival
Time Frame: up to 30 months.
OS is defined as the time from the date of enrollment until the date of death from any cause.
up to 30 months.
disease-free survival
Time Frame: up to 30 months.
Event-free survival is defined as the time from enrollment until documented refractory disease, relapse after complete remission(CR) or CR with incomplete recovery of blood counts(CRi), or death from any cause.
up to 30 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
mortality
Time Frame: mortality rate at 30 months.
The proportion of patients from enrollment to death was recorded.
mortality rate at 30 months.
recurrence rate
Time Frame: recurrence rate at 30 months.
Record the proportion of patients with recurrence in the study.
recurrence rate at 30 months.
adverse events
Time Frame: Adverse events were assessed weekly during the first and second cycles, and every two cycles thereafter (each cycle is 28 days), up to 30 months.
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v5.0.
Adverse events were assessed weekly during the first and second cycles, and every two cycles thereafter (each cycle is 28 days), up to 30 months.
apoptotic protein and phosphorylated protein
Time Frame: once before enrollment and once after the completion of the study, up to 30 months.
The relative expression of apoptotic protein(caspase3, caspase8) and phosphorylated protein(pSTAT3, pSTAT5, pAKT) were detected by western blot with bone marrow aspirate.
once before enrollment and once after the completion of the study, up to 30 months.
DNA methyltransferase, tumor suppressor genes and differentiation genes
Time Frame: once before enrollment and once after the completion of the study, up to 30 months.
To detect the mRNA expression of DNA methyltransferase(DNMT1, DNMT3a, DNMT3b), tumor suppressor genes(TP53,P15, P16, P21, CDH1, DOK6, SHP1, PTPN11) and differentiation gene(pu.1, C/EBPα, C/EBPβ) with bone marrow aspirate by Q-PCR.
once before enrollment and once after the completion of the study, up to 30 months.
methylation level in the promoter region of some tumor suppressor genes.
Time Frame: once before enrollment and once after the completion of the study, up to 30 months.
Detection of methylation level in the promoter region of the above tumor suppressor genes by pyrophosphate sequencing using patient bone marrow aspirate.
once before enrollment and once after the completion of the study, up to 30 months.
Percentage of bone marrow cell apoptosis population
Time Frame: once before enrollment and once after the completion of the study, up to 30 months.
The percentage of apoptotic population of bone marrow cells was determined by flow cytometry.
once before enrollment and once after the completion of the study, up to 30 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
LanZhou University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Beijing Health Alliance Charitable Foundation

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 13, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 1, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 6, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 13, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 25, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 21, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AZALDDASA3
  • ChiCTR2100042418 (Registry Identifier: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

After the completion of the clinical trial, we will choose whether to disclose the result according to the relevant regulations of the Chinese Genetic Office.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings