Advancing HPV Vaccination Among HIV Positive Adults: The CHAMPS Study (CHAMPS)

May 12, 2026 updated by: Jessica Wells, Emory University

Implementing an Evidence-Based, Multilevel Intervention to Promote HPV Vaccination Among HIV Positive Adults

People living with HIV (PLWH) are 28 times more likely to be diagnosed with Human Papillomavirus (HPV) - associated anal cancer than the general population. The HPV vaccine is an effective and safe approach to prevent and reduce the risk of HPV-related disease among PLWH. HPV vaccine programs tailored and implemented in the HIV population are lagging for this high-risk group. The CDC's 4 Pillars Transformation Program is a multi-level, evidence-based intervention that has been successfully used to increase HPV vaccination in the general population and is ready to be tested in the high-risk HIV population, particularly PLWH in the rural South. This program offers providers and clinic staff evidence-based strategies to increase HPV vaccination uptake via training and educational resources. This study proposes to tailor and refine the 4 Pillars Program and conduct this project in three HIV clinics in Georgia.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

People living with HIV (PLWH) are 28 times more likely to be diagnosed with HPV- associated anal cancer than the general population. The HPV vaccine is an effective and safe approach to prevent and reduce the risk of HPV-related disease among PLWH. However, in previous pilot studies, significant gaps were found in knowledge and awareness of the HPV vaccine, as well as low receipt of the HPV vaccine (13.5%) in our population of rural PLWH.

HPV vaccine programs tailored and implemented in the HIV population are lagging for this high-risk group. The Center for Disease Control's (CDC) 4 Pillars Transformation Program is a multi-level, evidence-based intervention successfully used to increase HPV vaccination in the general population and is ready to be tested in the high-risk HIV population, particularly PLWH in the rural South.

The 4 Pillars Program offers providers and clinic staff evidence-based strategies to increase HPV vaccination uptake via training and educational resources. Providers and clinic staff interested in participating will "enroll" online and complete an electronic informed consent before participating in the focus groups and completing the evaluation surveys. Providers and clinic staff will be offered an opportunity to participate in in-service training (CE units will be available) that will provide education and resources on the 4 Pillars program and will learn more about HPV, HPV vaccination, and HPV-associated cancers. Providers and clinic staff will be asked to recommend and administer the HPV vaccine during each routine clinic visit. Consenting providers and clinic staff will be asked to complete pre-intervention evaluations, an intervention evaluation every 3 months, a post-evaluation, and post-intervention assessments.

For patient enrollment, the research coordinator, with assistance from a clinic-designated Immunization Champion (IC), will review the clinic's appointment schedule to call patients in the target age range (18- 45 years of age) one week in advance of their appointments to inform them of the study and to determine eligibility. If eligible and interested in the proposed study, the individual will be given an overview of the research study, including its purpose, what participation entails, potential risks and benefits of participation, and measures that will be used to ensure confidentiality. Participants will be assured that participation is completely voluntary, and they may withdraw from the study at any time without consequences. If the individual volunteers to participate in the study, an electronic informed consent will be obtained by the research assistant(s) via REDCap. Participants will be asked to consent to have their HPV vaccination status confirmed via electronic medical records and GRITS. Participants will then watch a short video on HPV and HPV vaccines that can be viewed on their phones (or the clinic's iPad) while waiting to be seen. Potential participants will be asked to "follow" the study's private Facebook page, which will offer additional educational information tailored towards individuals with HIV on HPV-related disease and general health promotion and risk reduction tips. A post-intervention evaluation will be provided after the third immunization is given or due (if missed).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
267

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Georgia
      • Albany, Georgia, United States, 31705
        • Albany Rural Model Clinic
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30309
        • AID Atlanta
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30311
        • Faebris
      • Lithonia, Georgia, United States, 30058
        • AHF Lithonia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • HIV positive
  • 18-45 years of age
  • Can read and speak English
  • Capable of providing informed consent
  • Has not previously received three series HPV vaccine
  • No contraindications to receiving HPV vaccine (i.e. history of anaphylactic allergy to later, an immediate hypersensitivity to yeast, current moderate or severe acute illness, and/or are currently pregnant).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has contraindications to receiving the HPV vaccine i.e., history of an anaphylactic allergy to latex, an immediate hypersensitivity to yeast, current moderate or severe acute illness, and/or are currently pregnant)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: 4 Pillars Program
Patients at study clinics who consent to have their HPV vaccination history verified with the Georgia Registry of Immunization Transactions and Services (GRITS).
Behavioral: CDC 4 Pillars Program
The CDC's 4 Pillars Transformation Program (4 Pillars Program) is a robust and empirically supported strategic approach that promotes the uptake of adult vaccinations and addresses facilitators and barriers at the patient, provider, and clinic level. This multi-level, evidence-based intervention has been successfully utilized to increase HPV vaccination in the general population and is primed to be tested in the high-risk HIV population, particularly PLWH in the rural South. This proposal seeks to expand the success of the 4 Pillars Program and tailor, refine, and implement in the HIV positive population who are at extraordinarily high risk for HPV-related cancers and can obtain the most benefit from the vaccine.
No Intervention: Adjacent time-period Control Group
The background HPV update rate among PLWH will be obtained by using the electronic medical record (EMR) and GRITS to identify HPV vaccination uptake 18 months prior to the intervention. These data are collected retrospectively and no study participants are prospectively assigned to this study arm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients initiating the HPV vaccine
Time Frame: 24 months post baseline
Initiation of the HPV vaccine is defined as receiving the first or second immunization from the series. This variable will be measured by electronic medical records and GRITS at 24 months post baseline.
24 months post baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants completing the HPV vaccine
Time Frame: 24 months post baseline
Completion is defined as receiving all 3 immunizations from the series, regardless of time. This variable will be measured by electronic medical records and GRITS 24 months post baseline.
24 months post baseline
Change in uptake rate of vaccination
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 months post baseline
The team will calculate the percent change in initiation of the vaccine and percent change in completion of the vaccine from the control phase and 24 months post intervention, after adjusting for demographics differences in population.
Baseline and 24 months post baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Emory University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jessica Wells, PhD, RN, Emory University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 22, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 22, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 1, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 4, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 14, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 12, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • STUDY00002469
  • R01NR020154-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • 2025P009279 (Other Identifier: Emory Insight Humans IRB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual data that underlie the results of the study's specific aims. All reported data, including text, tables, figures, and appendices, will be de-identified.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Investigators whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee, for individual participant data meta-analysis. Proposals may be submitted up to 36 months following article publication. After 36 months the data will be available in our University's data warehouse but without investigator support other than deposited metadata

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Human Papilloma Virus

Clinical Trials on CDC 4 Pillars Program

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings