Home-based Brain Stimulation Treatment for Post-acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC)

June 29, 2026 updated by: Hamdi Eryilmaz, PhD, Massachusetts General Hospital

Home-based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for Treatment of Cognitive Post-acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC)

The main goal of this study is to improve dysexecutive symptoms (e.g., sustained attention, processing speed) in patients exhibiting post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) through home-based transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a noninvasive method that uses low intensity electric currents delivered to the brain through stimulation electrodes on the scalp.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
31

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States, 02129
        • Massachusetts General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ability to provide informed consent
  • A diagnosis of PASC as indicated by past COVID-19 infection, and persistent symptoms, including 'brain fog', confusion, short-term memory deficits, trouble concentrating, delirium, difficulties in multitasking.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of epilepsy
  • Metallic implants in the head and neck,
  • Brain stimulators
  • Pacemakers
  • Pregnancy
  • Active substance dependence (except for tobacco)
  • Premorbid major neurological illness
  • Severe mental illness (e.g., bipolar disorder, schizophrenia)
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Active tDCS
This group will receive daily active stimulation (2 mA) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for 4 weeks through a home-based tDCS device in remotely-supervised 30-min sessions.
Device: Active tDCS
2 mA of anodal stimulation will be applied to the left prefrontal cortex over the F3 electrode based on the International 10-10 EEG system.
Sham Comparator: Sham tDCS
This group will receive daily sham stimulation to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for 4 weeks through a home-based tDCS device in remotely-supervised 30-min sessions.
Device: Sham tDCS
Sham stimulation will be applied to the left prefrontal cortex over the F3 electrode.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Inhibitory Control
Time Frame: Baseline
Performance during the incongruent trials of the Eriksen Flanker Task were assessed at baseline (before the beginning of the 4-week home tDCS intervention). The performance is quantified as the ratio of correct responses to all responses. For example, a score of 0.70 indicates that the participant responded to 70% of the trials correctly.
Baseline
Inhibitory Control
Time Frame: Posttreatment (1 month follow-up)
Performance during the incongruent trials of the Eriksen Flanker Task were assessed approximately approximately 4-weeks after baseline. The performance is quantified as the ratio of correct responses to all responses. For example, a score of 0.70 indicates that the participant responded to 70% of the trials correctly.
Posttreatment (1 month follow-up)
Processing Speed
Time Frame: Baseline
Reaction time during the incongruent trials of the Eriksen Flanker Task were assessed at baseline (before the beginning of the 4-week home tDCS intervention)
Baseline
Processing Speed
Time Frame: Posttreatment (1 month follow-up)
Reaction time during the incongruent trials of the Eriksen Flanker Task were assessed approximately 4-weeks after baseline.
Posttreatment (1 month follow-up)
EEG P300 Event-related Potential
Time Frame: Baseline
EEG P300 amplitudes time-locked to the incongruent trials of the Eriksen Flanker Task were assessed at baseline (before the beginning of the 4-week home tDCS intervention). EEG event-related potential amplitudes (measured in microvolts, µV) were normalized across EEG channels using a scaling procedure, in which each channel was rescaled to reduce variability in signal magnitude among electrodes while preserving temporal and spectral characteristics. While larger P300 amplitudes are typically associated with better cognitive outcomes, this can vary among study populations.
Baseline
EEG P300 Event-related Potential
Time Frame: Posttreatment (1 month follow-up)
EEG P300 amplitudes time-locked to the incongruent trials of the Eriksen Flanker Task were assessed approximately 4-weeks after baseline. EEG event-related potential amplitudes (measured in microvolts, µV) were normalized across EEG channels using a scaling procedure, in which each channel was rescaled to reduce variability in signal magnitude among electrodes while preserving temporal and spectral characteristics. While larger P300 amplitudes are typically associated with better cognitive outcomes, this can vary among study populations.
Posttreatment (1 month follow-up)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive Flexibility
Time Frame: Baseline
Performance on the NIH Toolbox Dimensional Change Card Sort Test, a computerized measure of executive function assessing cognitive flexibility, attention, and set-shifting. Participants match target stimuli based on changing rules (e.g., color or shape). Scores are reported as fully corrected (for age, gender, race/ethnicity, and education) T-scores (mean = 50, SD = 10), with higher scores indicating better cognitive flexibility and executive control.
Baseline
Cognitive Flexibility
Time Frame: Posttreatment (1 month follow-up)
Performance on the NIH Toolbox Dimensional Change Card Sort Test, a computerized measure of executive function assessing cognitive flexibility, attention, and set-shifting. Participants match target stimuli based on changing rules (e.g., color or shape). Scores are reported as fully corrected (for age, gender, race/ethnicity, and education) T-scores (mean = 50, SD = 10), with higher scores indicating better cognitive flexibility and executive control.
Posttreatment (1 month follow-up)
Working Memory
Time Frame: Baseline
Performance on the NIH Toolbox List Sorting Working Memory Test, which assesses working memory capacity through sequencing and recall of visually and verbally presented stimuli in size order. The task requires temporary storage and manipulation of information across increasing list lengths. Scores are reported as fully corrected (for age, gender, race/ethnicity, and education) T-scores (mean = 50, SD = 10), with higher scores indicating better working memory performance.
Baseline
Working Memory
Time Frame: Posttreatment (1 month follow-up)
Performance on the NIH Toolbox List Sorting Working Memory Test, which assesses working memory capacity through sequencing and recall of visually and verbally presented stimuli in size order. The task requires temporary storage and manipulation of information across increasing list lengths. Scores are reported as fully corrected (for age, gender, race/ethnicity, and education) T-scores (mean = 50, SD = 10), with higher scores indicating better working memory performance.
Posttreatment (1 month follow-up)
Episodic Memory
Time Frame: Baseline
Performance on the NIH Toolbox Picture Sequence Memory Test, a measure of episodic memory in which participants reproduce the order of a sequence of visually presented pictures. The task assesses the ability to encode, store, and retrieve sequential information. Scores are reported as fully corrected (for age, gender, race/ethnicity, and education) T-scores (mean = 50, SD = 10), with higher scores indicating better episodic memory function.
Baseline
Episodic Memory
Time Frame: Posttreatment (1 month follow-up)
Performance on the NIH Toolbox Picture Sequence Memory Test, a measure of episodic memory in which participants reproduce the order of a sequence of visually presented pictures. The task assesses the ability to encode, store, and retrieve sequential information. Scores are reported as fully corrected (for age, gender, race/ethnicity, and education) T-scores (mean = 50, SD = 10), with higher scores indicating better episodic memory function.
Posttreatment (1 month follow-up)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Massachusetts General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 7, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 13, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 21, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 21, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 25, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 29, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2021P002953

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings