Multimodality Evaluation of LAA Leaks Arising After Incomplete LAAC: Insights From the LAA-Leak Registry
Comparison of the Efficacy of Successful Leak Closure Between Available Leak Closure Methods for Clinically Relevant and Persisting Leaks Arising After Incomplete LAAC: Insights From the LAA-Leak Registry
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Kansas
-
Overland Park, Kansas, United States, 66211
- Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients at risk for stroke or thromboembolism that demonstrated any degree of the significant leak on follow up TEE imaging at least 4-6 weeks following either epicardial, endocardial, or surgical LAAC
- Patients undergoing any form of eccentric or centric/central leak closure with available modalities (detachable embolization coils, vascular plus/septal/ASD occluders, or RF Ablation). Criteria for this was made based on the judgement of the operator, with no specific cutoffs for leak size, follow-up time from LAAC to leak closure, etc)
- Age greater than 18 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients not undergoing leak closure after incomplete LAAC
- Patients unable to complete 45 day follow-up imaging for reevaluation of LAA leak
- Patients unable to consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Retrospective
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Detachable embolization coils group
Patients who have an intervention for leak closure with detachable embolization coils
|
All patients were evaluated and followed with imaging, and per investigators' respective clinical judgement, then proceeded to have an intervention for leak closure with either detachable embolization coils, vascular plugs/CSO, or RFA.
|
|
Vascular plugs/septal occluders group
Patients who have an intervention for leak closure with vascular plugs/CSO
|
All patients were evaluated and followed with imaging, and per investigators' respective clinical judgement, then proceeded to have an intervention for leak closure with either detachable embolization coils, vascular plugs/CSO, or RFA.
|
|
RF Ablation group
Patients who have an intervention for leak closure with Radio Frequency Ablation (RFA)
|
All patients were evaluated and followed with imaging, and per investigators' respective clinical judgement, then proceeded to have an intervention for leak closure with either detachable embolization coils, vascular plugs/CSO, or RFA.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of closure (in mm) of PDL/reduction in size of PDL after leak closure procedure
Time Frame: 1/11/2015 - 3/14/2021
|
Size of leak in mm on TEE after leak closure procedure, immediately at the end of the procedure and on 45 day follow-up TEE
|
1/11/2015 - 3/14/2021
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Periprocedural complications occurring from Postoperative day #0 - day 7
Time Frame: 1/11/2015 - 6/8/2021
|
Primary Safety Endpoint: periprocedural complications occurring from Postoperative days 0 - 7, including: device-related thrombus, pericardial effusion/pericardial tamponade requiring intervention and CVA.
|
1/11/2015 - 6/8/2021
|
|
Delayed procedure-related complications and adverse events within 90 days of procedure
Time Frame: 1/11/2015 - 6/8/2021
|
Secondary Safety Endpoint: Delayed procedure-related complications and adverse events within 90 days of procedure including device-related thrombus, pericardial effusion/ pericardial tamponade requiring intervention and CVA.
|
1/11/2015 - 6/8/2021
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy, Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Holmes DR, Reddy VY, Turi ZG, Doshi SK, Sievert H, Buchbinder M, Mullin CM, Sick P; PROTECT AF Investigators. Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2009 Aug 15;374(9689):534-42. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61343-X. Erratum In: Lancet. 2009 Nov 7;374(9701):1596.
- Holmes DR Jr, Kar S, Price MJ, Whisenant B, Sievert H, Doshi SK, Huber K, Reddy VY. Prospective randomized evaluation of the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure device in patients with atrial fibrillation versus long-term warfarin therapy: the PREVAIL trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 8;64(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.029. Erratum In: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Sep 16;64(11):1186.
- Reddy VY, Doshi SK, Kar S, Gibson DN, Price MJ, Huber K, Horton RP, Buchbinder M, Neuzil P, Gordon NT, Holmes DR Jr; PREVAIL and PROTECT AF Investigators. 5-Year Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: From the PREVAIL and PROTECT AF Trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 19;70(24):2964-2975. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.021. Epub 2017 Nov 4.
- Nguyen A, Gallet R, Riant E, Deux JF, Boukantar M, Mouillet G, Dubois-Randé JL, Lellouche N, Teiger E, Lim P, Ternacle J. Peridevice Leak After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Impact. Can J Cardiol. 2019 Apr;35(4):405-412. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.12.022. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
- Sahore A, Della Rocca DG, Anannab A, Mohanty S, Akella K, Murtaza G, Trivedi C, Gianni C, Chen Q, Bassiouny M, Ahmadian-Tehrani A, Macdonald B, Al-Ahmad A, Tarantino N, Cirone D, Horton RP, Romero J, Lakkireddy D, Di Biase L, Natale A. Clinical Implications and Management Strategies for Left Atrial Appendage Leaks. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2020 Mar;12(1):89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ccep.2019.11.010. Review.
- Albaghdadi, M., et al., Peri-Device Leaks after Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Clinical Significance and Unmet Diagnostic Needs. Structural Heart, 2020. 4(6): p. 475-481
- Mohanty S, Gianni C, Trivedi C, Gadiyaram V, Della Rocca DG, MacDonald B, Horton R, Al-Ahmad A, Gibson DN, Price M, Krumerman AK, Palma EC, Di Biase L, Lakkireddy D, Natale A. Risk of thromboembolic events after percutaneous left atrial appendage ligation in patients with atrial fibrillation: Long-term results of a multicenter study. Heart Rhythm. 2020 Feb;17(2):175-181. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.08.003. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
- Aryana A, Singh SK, Singh SM, O'Neill PG, Bowers MR, Allen SL, Lewandowski SL, Vierra EC, d'Avila A. Association between incomplete surgical ligation of left atrial appendage and stroke and systemic embolization. Heart Rhythm. 2015 Jul;12(7):1431-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.03.028. Epub 2015 May 18.
- Turagam MK, Velagapudi P, Kar S, Holmes D, Reddy VY, Refaat MM, Di Biase L, Al-Ahmed A, Chung MK, Lewalter T, Edgerton J, Cox J, Fisher J, Natale A, Lakkireddy DR. Cardiovascular Therapies Targeting Left Atrial Appendage. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):448-463. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.048. Epub 2018 Jun 26. Review.
- Jang SJ, Wong SC, Mosadegh B. Leaks after Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Ignored or Neglected? Cardiology. 2021;146(3):384-391. doi: 10.1159/000513901. Epub 2021 Mar 18. Review.
- Della Rocca DG, Horton RP, Di Biase L, Bassiouny M, Al-Ahmad A, Mohanty S, Gasperetti A, Natale VN, Trivedi C, Gianni C, Burkhardt JD, Gallinghouse GJ, Hranitzky P, Sanchez JE, Natale A. First Experience of Transcatheter Leak Occlusion With Detachable Coils Following Left Atrial Appendage Closure. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb 10;13(3):306-319. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.10.022. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
- Della Rocca DG, Horton RP, Tarantino N, Van Niekerk CJ, Trivedi C, Chen Q, Mohanty S, Anannab A, Murtaza G, Akella K, Gianni C, Bassiouny M, Ahmadian-Tehrani A, Al-Ahmad A, Burkhardt JD, Natale VN, Price M, Gallinghouse GJ, Gibson DN, Lakkireddy D, Di Biase L, Natale A. Use of a Novel Septal Occluder Device for Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Patients With Postsurgical and Postlariat Leaks or Anatomies Unsuitable for Conventional Percutaneous Occlusion. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Oct;13(10):e009227. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009227. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- KCHRF-LAA Leak Registry-0007
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.