A Study to Investigate Vamikibart (RO7200220) in Combination With Ranibizumab in Diabetic Macular Edema

September 30, 2025 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche

A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Double Masked, Active Comparator-Controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of RO7200220 in Combination With Ranibizumab Administered Intravitreally in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema

Study BP43464 is a phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-masked active comparator-controlled study designed to assess the efficacy, safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of vamikibart in combination with, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor, ranibizumab compared with ranibizumab alone in participants with diabetic macular edema. Only one eye will be chosen as the study eye. The duration of the study will be 76 weeks.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
187

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Argentina
      • Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1015ABO
        • Organizacion Medica de Investigacion
      • Capital Federal, Argentina, C1120AAN
        • Oftalmos
      • Capital Federal, Argentina, C1116
        • Centro Oftalmologico Dr. Charles S.A.
      • Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1061AAE
        • Buenos Aires Mácula
      • Rosario, Argentina, S2000DLA
        • Grupo Laser Vision
  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K2B 7E9
        • Retina Institute of Ottawa
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M3C 0G9
        • Toronto Retina Institute
    • Quebec
      • Boisbriand, Quebec, Canada, J7H 0E8
        • Institut De L'Oeil Des Laurentides
  • Israel
      • Haifa, Israel, 3109601
        • Rambam Medical Center
      • Jerusalem, Israel, 9112001
        • Hadassah MC
      • Petah Tikva, Israel, 4941492
        • Rabin MC
      • Rehovot, Israel, 7660101
        • Kaplan Medical Center
      • Tel Aviv, Israel, 6423906
        • Tel Aviv Sourasky MC
  • Poland
      • Gliwice, Poland, 44-100
        • Niepubliczny Zak?ad Opieki Zdrowotnej PRYZMAT-OKULISTYKA
      • Krakow, Poland, 31-070
        • Centrum Medyczne UNO-MED
      • Olsztyn, Poland, 10-424
        • Centrum Diagnostyki i Mikrochirurgii Oka LENS
      • Tarnowskie Góry, Poland, 42-600
        • Caminomed
  • Puerto Rico
      • Arecibo, Puerto Rico, 00613
        • Emanuelli Research and Development Center LLC
  • South Korea
      • Busan, South Korea, 49241
        • Pusan National University Hospital
      • Daegu, South Korea, 42415
        • Yeungnam University Medical Center
      • Seoul, South Korea, 05505
        • Asan Medical Center
      • Seoul, South Korea, 06351
        • Samsung Medical Center
      • Seoul, South Korea, 07301
        • Kim's Eye Hospital
  • Spain
      • Madrid, Spain, 28027
        • Clinica Universitaria de Navarra
    • Navarre
      • Pamplona, Navarre, Spain, 31008
        • Clinica Universitaria de Navarra
  • United Kingdom
      • Gloucestershire, United Kingdom, GL1 3NN
        • Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
      • Guildford, United Kingdom, GU2 7XX
        • Royal Surrey County Hospital
      • London, United Kingdom, SE5 9RS
        • Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • United States
    • California
      • Arcadia, California, United States, 91006
        • Win Retina
      • Torrance, California, United States, 90502
        • Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
      • Walnut Creek, California, United States, 94598
        • Bay Area Retina Associates
    • Florida
      • Melbourne, Florida, United States, 30394-7344
        • Florida Eye Associates
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33617
        • Retina Vitreous Associates of Florida
    • Maryland
      • Hagerstown, Maryland, United States, 21740
        • Cumberland Valley Retina Consultants
    • Mississippi
      • Southaven, Mississippi, United States, 38671
        • Deep Blue Retina PLLC
    • Oregon
      • Eugene, Oregon, United States, 97401
        • Verum Research LLC
    • Texas
      • Arlington, Texas, United States, 76012
        • Texas Retina Associates
      • Bellaire, Texas, United States, 77401
        • Retina Consultants of Texas

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (Type 1 or Type 2)
  • Macular thickening secondary to diabetic macular edema (DME) involving the center of the macula
  • Decreased visual acuity attributable primarily to DME
  • Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent and to comply with the study protocol
  • Willingness to allow Aqueous Humor collection
  • For women of childbearing potential: agreement to remain abstinent or use at least one highly effective contraceptive method that results in a failure rate of <1% per year during the treatment period and for at least 12 weeks after the final dose of study treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of greater than (>) 12%
  • Uncontrolled blood pressure, defined as a systolic value greater than (>)180 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and/or a diastolic value >100 mmHg while a patient is at rest
  • Currently pregnant or breastfeeding, or intend to become pregnant during the study
  • Prior treatment with panretinal photocoagulation or macular laser to the study eye
  • Any intraocular or periocular corticosteroid treatment within the past 16 weeks prior to Day 1 to the study eye
  • Prior Iluvien or Retisert implants within 3 years prior to Day 1 to the study eye
  • Prior or concomitant treatment with anti-VEGF therapy within 8 weeks prior to Day 1 to the study eye; Vabysmo^TM within 16 weeks prior to Day 1, prior Beovu® is not permitted
  • Prior administration of IVT brolucizumab (Beovu®): ever; vamikibart: </=24 weeks prior to Day 1) in either eye
  • Any proliferative diabetic retinopathy
  • Active intraocular or periocular infection or active intraocular inflammation in the study eye
  • Any current or history of ocular disease other than DME that may confound assessment of the macula or affect central vision in the study eye
  • Any current ocular condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, is currently causing or could be expected to contribute to irreversible vision loss due to a cause other than DME in the study eye
  • Other protocol-specified inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Arm B: Ranibizumab
Participants will receive ranibizumab, 0.5 mg IVT, from Day 1 and Q4W in combination with sham up to Week 44, for a total of 12 injections, followed by an observational period up to Week 72.
Drug: Ranibizumab
Ranibizumab will be administered by IVT injection in the study eye.
Other Names:
  • Lucentis
Other: Sham Procedure
Sham is a procedure that mimics an IVT injection and involves the blunt end of an empty syringe (without a needle) being pressed against the anesthetized eye.
Experimental: Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab
Participants will receive vamikibart, 1 milligram (mg) administered as intravitreal (IVT) injection in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg IVT, on Day 1 and every fourth week (Q4W) up to Week 44, for a total of 12 injections, followed by an observational period up to Week 72.
Drug: Ranibizumab
Ranibizumab will be administered by IVT injection in the study eye.
Other Names:
  • Lucentis
Drug: Vamikibart
Vamikibart will be administered by IVT injection in the study eye.
Other Names:
  • RO7200220

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Averaged Over Week 44 and Week 48 in Treatment-naïve Participants
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 44 and Week 48
BCVA was measured via Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified visual acuity (VA) examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 letters. Higher scores and gain in BCVA from baseline indicate improvement in VA. This analysis used a Mixed Model for Repeated Measurements (MMRM) model.
Baseline, Week 44 and Week 48

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Systemic and Ocular Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: Up to Week 72
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Systemic AEs include all non-ocular AEs.
Up to Week 72
Change From Baseline in BCVA Averaged Over Week 44 and Week 48 in Previously Treated Participants
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 44 and Week 48
BCVA was measured via ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 letters. Higher scores and gain in BCVA from baseline indicate improvement in VA. This analysis used a MMRM model.
Baseline, Week 44 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in BCVA Averaged Over Week 44 and Week 48 in Overall ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 44 and Week 48
BCVA was measured via ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 letters. Higher scores and gain in BCVA from baseline indicate improvement in VA. This analysis used a MMRM model.
Baseline, Week 44 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in BCVA Averaged Over Week 32 and Week 36, in Treatment-naïve Participants
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 32 and Week 36
BCVA was measured via ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 letters. Higher scores and gain in BCVA from baseline indicate improvement in VA. This analysis used a MMRM model.
Baseline, Week 32 and Week 36
Change From Baseline in BCVA Averaged Over Week 32 and Week 36, in Previously Treated Participants
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 32 and Week 36
BCVA was measured via ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 letters. Higher scores and gain in BCVA from baseline indicate improvement in VA. This analysis used a MMRM model.
Baseline, Week 32 and Week 36
Change From Baseline in BCVA Averaged Over Week 32 and Week 36, in Overall ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 32 and Week 36
BCVA was measured via ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 letters. Higher scores and gain in BCVA from baseline indicate improvement in VA. This analysis used a MMRM model.
Baseline, Week 32 and Week 36
Change From Baseline in BCVA Averaged Over Week 20 and Week 24 in Treatment-naïve Participants
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 20 and Week 24
BCVA was measured via ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 letters. Higher scores and gain in BCVA from baseline indicate improvement in VA. This analysis used a MMRM model.
Baseline, Week 20 and Week 24
Change From Baseline in BCVA Averaged Over Week 20 and Week 24 in Previously Treated Participants
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 20 and Week 24
BCVA was measured via ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 letters. Higher scores and gain in BCVA from baseline indicate improvement in VA. This analysis used a MMRM model.
Baseline, Week 20 and Week 24
Change From Baseline in BCVA Averaged Over Week 20 and Week 24, in Overall ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 20 and Week 24
BCVA was measured via ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 letters. Higher scores and gain in BCVA from baseline indicate improvement in VA. This analysis used a MMRM model.
Baseline, Week 20 and Week 24
Change From Baseline in BCVA Over Time in Overall ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
BCVA was measured via ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 letters. Higher scores and gain in BCVA from baseline indicate improvement in VA. This analysis used a MMRM model.
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥ 15, ≥ 10, ≥ 5, or ≥ 0 Letters in BCVA Over Time in Overall ITT Population
Time Frame: Up to Week 72
BCVA was measured via ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 letters. Higher scores indicate improvement in VA. Percentages have been rounded off.
Up to Week 72
Percentage of Participants Losing ≥ 15, ≥ 10, or ≥ 5 Letters in BCVA Over Time in Overall ITT Population
Time Frame: Up to Week 72
BCVA was measured via ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 letters. Higher scores indicate improvement in VA. Percentages have been rounded off.
Up to Week 72
Percentage of Participants With BCVA ≥ 69 Letters (20/40 Snellen Equivalent) Over Time
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
BCVA was measured via ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 (Snellen equivalent <20/800) to 100 (Snellen equivalent of 20/10) letters. Higher scores indicate improvement in VA. Percentages have been rounded off.
Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
Percentage of Participants With BCVA ≥ 84 Letters (20/20 Snellen Equivalent) Over Time
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
BCVA was measured via ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 (Snellen equivalent <20/800) to 100 (Snellen equivalent of 20/10) letters. Higher scores indicate improvement in VA. Percentages have been rounded off.
Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
Percentage of Participants With BCVA ≤ 38 Letters (20/200 Snellen Equivalent) Over Time
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
BCVA was measured via ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 (Snellen equivalent <20/800) to 100 (Snellen equivalent of 20/10) letters. Higher scores indicate improvement in VA. Percentages have been rounded off.
Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness (CST) Averaged Over Week 44 and Week 48 in Treatment-naïve Participants
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 44 and Week 48
CST was defined as the mean thickness from the inner limiting membrane to the retinal pigment epithelial over the 1 millimetre (mm) central subfield. CST was measured using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Negative change from baseline values denotes improvement. This analysis used a MMRM model.
Baseline, Week 44 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in CST Averaged Over Week 44 and Week 48 in Previously Treated Participants
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 44 and Week 48
CST was defined as the mean thickness from the inner limiting membrane to the retinal pigment epithelial over the 1 mm central subfield. CST was measured using SD-OCT. Negative change from baseline values denotes improvement. This analysis used a MMRM model.
Baseline, Week 44 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in CST Averaged Over Week 44 and Week 48 in Overall ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 44 and Week 48
CST was defined as the mean thickness from the inner limiting membrane to the retinal pigment epithelial over the 1 mm central subfield. CST was measured using SD-OCT. Negative change from baseline values denotes improvement. This analysis used an MMRM model.
Baseline, Week 44 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in CST Averaged Over Week 32 and Week 36 in Treatment-naïve Participants
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 32 and Week 36
CST was defined as the mean thickness from the inner limiting membrane to the retinal pigment epithelial over the 1 mm central subfield. CST was measured using SD-OCT. Negative change from baseline values denotes improvement. This analysis used an MMRM model.
Baseline, Week 32 and Week 36
Change From Baseline in CST Averaged Over Week 32 and Week 36 in Previously Treated Participants
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 32 and Week 36
CST was defined as the mean thickness from the inner limiting membrane to the retinal pigment epithelial over the 1 mm central subfield. CST was measured using SD-OCT. Negative change from baseline values denotes improvement. This analysis used an MMRM model.
Baseline, Week 32 and Week 36
Change From Baseline Averaged Over Week 32 and Week 36 in Overall ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 32 and Week 36
CST was defined as the mean thickness from the inner limiting membrane to the retinal pigment epithelial over the 1 mm central subfield. CST was measured using SD-OCT. Negative change from baseline values denotes improvement. This analysis used an MMRM model.
Baseline, Week 32 and Week 36
Change From Baseline in CST Averaged Over Week 20 and Week 24 in Treatment-naïve Participants
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 20 and Week 24
CST was defined as the mean thickness from the inner limiting membrane to the retinal pigment epithelial over the 1 mm central subfield. CST was measured using SD-OCT. Negative change from baseline values denotes improvement. This analysis used an MMRM model.
Baseline, Week 20 and Week 24
Change From Baseline in CST Averaged Over Week 20 and Week 24 in Previously Treated Participants
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 20 and Week 24
CST was defined as the mean thickness from the inner limiting membrane to the retinal pigment epithelial over the 1 mm central subfield. CST was measured using SD-OCT. Negative change from baseline values denotes improvement. This analysis used an MMRM model.
Baseline, Week 20 and Week 24
Change From Baseline in CST Averaged Over Week 20 and Week 24 in Overall ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 20 and Week 24
CST was defined as the mean thickness from the inner limiting membrane to the retinal pigment epithelial over the 1 mm central subfield. CST was measured using SD-OCT. Negative change from baseline values denotes improvement. This analysis used an MMRM model.
Baseline, Week 20 and Week 24
Change From Baseline in CST Over Time in Overall ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
CST was defined as the mean thickness from the inner limiting membrane to the retinal pigment epithelial over the 1 mm central subfield. CST was measured using SD-OCT. Negative change from baseline values denotes improvement. This analysis used an MMRM model.
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
Percentage of Participants With Absence of DME Over Time in Overall ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
Absence of DME was defined as CST < 325 μm for Spectralis SD-OCT, or < 315 μm for Cirrus SD-OCT or Topcon SD-OCT. Percentages have been rounded off.
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
Percentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) Over Time in Overall ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72
The absence of IRF in the study eye (defined as IRF absent or definite outside center subfield only) was assessed by the central reading center using SD-OCT. The percentage of participants with absence of IRF at foveal center are reported. Percentages have been rounded off.
Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72
Percentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid (SRF) Over Time in Overall ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72
The absence of SRF in the study eye (defined as SRF absent or definite outside center subfield only) was assessed by the central reading center using SD-OCT. The percentage of participants with absence of SRF at the foveal center are reported. Percentages have been rounded off.
Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hoffmann-La Roche

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Clinical Trials, Hoffmann-La Roche

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 17, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 17, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 8, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 8, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 9, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 16, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 30, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • BP43464
  • 2021-004390-31 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

For eligible studies, qualified researchers may request access to individual patient level clinical data. See Roche's commitment to transparency of clinical study information here: https://go.roche.com/data_sharing

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings