Examining Feasibility, Acceptability, and Sustainability of a Novel Personalized Smartphone Intervention for Suicide - Randomized Trial
Examining Feasibility, Acceptability, and Sustainability of a Novel Personalized Smartphone Intervention for Suicide
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Cheryl Cordeiro
- Phone Number: 401-455-6654
- Email: ccordeiro@butler.org
Study Locations
-
-
Rhode Island
-
Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02912
- Brown University
-
Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02906
- Butler Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Presence of suicidal ideation and/or suicidal behavior in the past month
- Between the ages of 18 and 70
- Able to read, write, and understand English well enough to complete study procedures
- Owns a smartphone
Exclusion Criteria:
- Current psychotic or manic symptoms severe enough to interfere with completion of study procedures
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Mobile Application to Prevent Suicide (MAPS)
Participants receiving MAPS will receive the Safety Planning Intervention (SPI) which will be uploaded into the smartphone app.
They will be prompted four times per day to complete a brief ecological momentary assessment "check-in" inquiring about their cognitions, affect, and behavior, including suicidal thoughts and behaviors.
Based on these responses, they will be provided with coping strategies from their safety plans and from a database of coping strategies created by study staff.
They will also have access to emergency phone numbers, the coping strategies database, and can communicate with their study clinician through a text-like interface in the app.
They will receive this intervention for one month.
|
Safety Planning Intervention, ecological momentary intervention smartphone app system, and bidirectional communication with study clinician.
|
|
Active Comparator: EMA Monitoring Only (EMO)
Participants in this condition will receive the Safety Planning Intervention (SPI) and will receive ecological momentary assessment prompts on the same schedule as the MAPS condition.
However, they will not have access to any other MAPS features.
|
Safety Planning Intervention; ecological momentary assessment only
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability of Research (Recruitment)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Measured by recruitment rate.
|
Baseline
|
|
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Measured using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, a self-report measure of satisfaction with treatment.
Scores range from 8 to 32, with higher scores representing higher satisfaction.
|
1 month
|
|
Acceptability of MAPS Intervention
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Feedback on qualitative interview.
|
1 month
|
|
Satisfaction with MAPS Intervention
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Measured by protocol completion rate.
|
4 weeks
|
|
Suicidal Ideation and Behavior
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Will be assessed using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale, items from the Modified Scale for Suicidal Ideation, and ecological momentary assessment of suicidal ideation and behavior.
The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale can provide presence/absence of suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior, as well as a suicidal ideation score ranging from 0 to 5 with higher scores representing more severe ideation, and a suicidal ideation intensity rating from 0-25 with higher scores representing more intense ideation.
|
6 months
|
|
Acceptability of Research Procedures
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Feedback on qualitative interview.
|
1 month
|
|
Acceptability of Research (Dropout)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Measured by dropout rate.
|
6 months
|
|
Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) Adherence
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Number of assessments completed out of total
|
4 weeks
|
|
Rehospitalization
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Number of inpatient rehospitalizations will be assessed using the Treatment History Interview and medical records review.
|
6 months
|
|
Emergency Department Visits
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Number of emergency department visits will be assessed using the Treatment History Interview and medical records review.
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Use of MAPS Intervention-delivered Coping Strategies (target mechanism)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Coping strategy use will be measured in three ways: (1) when participants are prompted to use a coping strategy via MAPS, followup prompts ask whether or not they used the coping skill, (2) in each EMA survey, participants are asked whether or not they used any coping skills since the last survey, and (3) the system provides output with regard to how many times participants dial a support contact phone number through the MAPS app.
|
4 weeks
|
|
Reduction of Negative Affect (target mechanism)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Negative affect will be measured using Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS-X) items on ecological momentary assessment surveys.
Each emotion item on the PANAS-X is rated on a 1-5 scale based on how participants feel, with 1 indicating "very slightly or not at all" and 5 indicating "extremely."
|
4 weeks
|
|
Self-Efficacy (target mechanism)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Coping self-efficacy will be measured using the Coping Self-Efficacy Scale.
Self-efficacy for seeking mental health care will be measured by the Self-Efficacy to Seek Mental Health Care Scale.
The total score can range from 0-260; the higher the score, the higher the level of coping self-efficacy.
|
4 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1678556
- R34MH124971 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.