Two Different Exercise Training in Frozen Shoulder Treatment
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Different Exercise Training in Frozen Shoulder Treatment
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Zeynal Yasacı
- Phone Number: +905075409791
- Email: zeynalyasaci@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey
- Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged >60 years
- Patients with shoulder pain of at least six months' duration secondary to tendinopathy and/or partial rotator cuff tear;
- Patients with ability to follow simple orders; iii)
- Patients with ability to sign to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Normal passive ROM
- External ROM < 30
- To have received treatment (physiotherapy, intra-articular injection, surgery) related to the existing complaint
- Pain < 3 according to the numbered pain assessment scale
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Graded Motor İmagery
Graded Motor İmagery (GMI) group will receive a treatment protocol consisting of Graded Motor Imagery, cold therapy, traditional exercises and home exercises.
|
Graded Motor Imagery program will be performed two times a week for six consecutive weeks and will include the following three steps: laterality training, imagined movements, and mirror therapy.
|
|
Active Comparator: Exercise
Exercise group will receive training involves mobilizations, stretching, specific exercises for the frozen shoulder.
|
Treatments including traditional physiotherapy approaches; joint mobilizations, stretching, scapula focused exercises etc.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index at 6th and 8th week
Time Frame: Baseline,6th week and 8th week
|
The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) was developed to measure current shoulder pain and disability in an outpatient setting.
The SPADI contains 13 items that assess two domains; a 5-item subscale that measures pain and an 8-item subscale that measures disability.
|
Baseline,6th week and 8th week
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline NPRS at 6th and 8th week
Time Frame: Baseline,6th week and 8th week
|
The Numerical Rating Scale (NPRS-11) is an 11-point scale for self-report of pain.
It is the most commonly used unidimensional pain scale.
The respondent selects a whole number (integers 0-10) that best reflects the intensity (or other quality if requested of his/her pain.
|
Baseline,6th week and 8th week
|
|
Change from baseline range of motion at 6th and 8th week
Time Frame: Baseline,6th week and 8th week
|
Range of motion is the capability of a joint to go through its complete spectrum of movements.
|
Baseline,6th week and 8th week
|
|
Change from baseline QuickDASH at 6th and 8th week
Time Frame: Baseline,6th week and 8th week
|
The purpose of the QuickDASH is to use 11 items to measure physical function and symptoms in people with any or multiple musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb.
|
Baseline,6th week and 8th week
|
|
Change from baseline two-point discrimination at 6th and 8th week
Time Frame: Baseline,6th week and 8th week
|
The two-point discrimination test is used to assess if the patient is able to identify two close points on a small area of skin, and how fine the ability to discriminate this are.
It is a measure of tactile agnosia, or the inability to recognize these two points despite intact cutaneous sensation and proprioception.
|
Baseline,6th week and 8th week
|
|
Change from Pain Catastrophizing Scale at 6th and 8th week
Time Frame: Baseline,6th week and 8th week
|
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a 13-item self-report measure designed to assess catastrophic thinking related to pain among adults with or without chronic pain.
|
Baseline,6th week and 8th week
|
|
Change from SF-12 at 6th and 8th week
Time Frame: Baseline,6th week and 8th week
|
The SF-12 is a self-reported outcome measure assessing the impact of health on an individual's everyday life.
It is often used as a quality of life measure.
|
Baseline,6th week and 8th week
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Derya Çelik, Istanbul University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 16.01.2022
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.